Skip to main content
Log in

A new approach to the measurement of polarization for grouped data

  • Original Paper
  • Published:
AStA Advances in Statistical Analysis Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

In this paper we develop a measure of polarization for discrete distributions of non-negative grouped data. The measure takes into account the relative sizes and homogeneities of individual groups as well as the heterogeneities between all pairs of groups. It is based on the assumption that the total polarization within the distribution can be understood as a function of the polarizations between all pairs of groups.

The measure allows information on existing groups within a population to be used directly to determine the degree of polarization. Thus the impact of various classifications on the degree of polarization can be analysed.

The treatment of the distribution’s total polarization as a function of pairwise polarizations allows statements concerning the effect of an individual pair or an individual group on the total polarization.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. D’Ambrosio, C. (2001) Household characteristics and the distribution of income in Italy: an application of social distance measures. The Review of Income and Wealth 47(1), 43–64

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Duclos, J.-Y., Esteban, J., Ray, D. (2004) Polarization: Concepts, measurement, estimation. Econometrica 72(6), 1737–1772

    Article  MATH  Google Scholar 

  3. Esteban, J., Gradín, C., Ray, D. (1999) Extensions of a measure of Polarization with an Application to the income distribution of five OECD countries. Working Paper No. 218, Maxwell School of Citizenship and Public Affairs, Syracuse University, Syracuse, New York

    Google Scholar 

  4. Esteban, J., Ray, D. (1994) On the measurement of polarization. Econometrica 62(4), 819–851

    Article  MATH  Google Scholar 

  5. Esteban, J., Ray, D. (1999) Conflict and distribution. Journal of Economic Theory 87, 379–415

    Article  MATH  Google Scholar 

  6. Gradín, C. (2000) Polarization by sub-populations in Spain, 1973–91. The Review of Income and Wealth 46(4), 457–474

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Mosler, K., Schmid, F. (2005) Beschreibende Statistik und Wirtschaftsstatistik. Springer, Berlin

    MATH  Google Scholar 

  8. Schmidt, A. (2004) Statistische Messung der Einkommenspolarisation. Eul Verlag, Lohmar-Köln

    Google Scholar 

  9. Wang, Y.-Q., Tsui, K.-Y. (2000) Polarization orderings and new classes of polarization indices. Journal of Public Economic Theory 2(3), 349–363

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Wolfson, M.C. (1994) When inequalities diverge. The American Economic Review 84(2), 353–358

    Google Scholar 

  11. Zhang, X., Kanbur, R. (2001) What difference do polarisation measures make? An application to China. Journal of Development Studies 37, 85–98

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding authors

Correspondence to Eckart Bomsdorf or Clemens Otto.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Bomsdorf, E., Otto, C. A new approach to the measurement of polarization for grouped data . AStA 91, 181–196 (2007). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10182-007-0027-0

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10182-007-0027-0

Keywords

Navigation