Abstract
As more research focuses on behavioral syndromes and their role in ecological and evolutionary processes, it is imperative that methods to test behavior are valid. The objectives of this study were to (1) assess behavior in captive coyotes (Canis latrans) using three methods [agitation scores, novel object test, and flight-initiation distance (FID)] and (2) to determine whether the three tests were correlated within individuals to describe behavioral syndromes. Female coyotes had higher agitation scores during handling (2.6 ± 0.5) than males (1.5 ± 0.3; t = 1.90, p = 0.06): scores ranged from 0 to 8 on a 0–11 scale. The most common behavior observed was biting at y-stick. Only 27 % of males and 10 % of females approached a novel object within 1 m, with females (37.3 ± 18.6 s) taking less time than males (136.7 ± 50.4 s; p = 0.09). There was no difference in the distance at which males (17.5 ± 4.0 m) and females fled during FID tests (20.7 ± 5.4 m; p = 0.64, n = 30). We found no relationships between FID and agitation scores (r 2 = 0.13, p = 0.12) or time to approach a novel object and agitation scores (r 2 = 0.001, p = 0.89). There was a slightly positive relationship between FID and time to approach a novel object (r 2 = 0.15, p = 0.03), but no relationship among all three tests (r 2 = 0.15, p = 0.45). Our results suggest a behavioral syndrome for boldness and explorations, but these traits are unlikely to be coupled with aggression in coyotes. While these three tests may not be ideally combined to create a behavioral syndrome in individual coyotes, using FID and novel object testing may elucidate a type of behavioral syndrome.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Adams NJ, Farnworth MJ, Rickett J, Parker KA, Cockrem JF (2011) Behavioural and corticosterone responses to capture and confinement of wild blackbirds (Turdus merula). Appl Anim Behav Sci 134:246–255
Andelt WF (1985) Behavioral ecology of coyotes in south Texas. Wildl Monogr 90:3–45
Atwood TC, Weeks HP, Gehring TM (2004) Spatial ecology of coyotes along a suburban-to-rural gradient. J Wildl Manag 68:1000–1009
Balser DS (1965) Tranquilizer tabs for capturing wildlife carnivores. J Wildl Manag 28:438–442
Baudains TP, Lloyd P (2007) Habituation and habitat changes can moderate the impacts of human disturbance on shorebird breeding performance. Anim Conserv 10:400–407
Beaver BV (1983) Clinical classification of canine aggression. Appl Anim Ethol 10:35–43
Bekoff M (1977) Canis latrans. Mamm Species 79:1–9
Bell AM (2007) Future directions in behavioural syndromes research. Proc Royal Soc B Biol Sci 274:755–761
Blumstein DT (2003) Flight-initiation distance in birds is dependent on intruder starting distance. J Wildl Manag 67:852–857
Blumstein DT (2006) Developing an evolutionary ecology of fear: how life history and natural history traits affect disturbance tolerance in birds. Anim Behav 71:389–399
Blumstein DT, Fernandez-Juricic E, Zollner PA, Garity SC (2005) Inter-specific variation in avian responses to human disturbance. J Wildl Manag 42:943–953
Both C, Dingemanse NJ, Drent PJ, Tinbergen JM (2005) Pairs of extreme avian personalities have highest reproductive success. J Anim Ecol 74:667–674
Bowen WD (1981) Variation in coyote social organization: the influence of prey size. Can J Zool 59:639–652
Bremner-Harrison S, Prodohl PA, Elwood RW (2004) Behavioural trait assessment as a release criterion: boldness predicts early death in a reintroduction programme of captive-bred swift fox (Vulpes velox). Anim Conserv 7:313–320
Broom M, Ruxton GD (2005) You can run—or you can hide: optimal strategies for cryptic prey. Behav Ecol 16:534–540
Burns JG (2008) The validity of three tests of temperament in guppies (Poecilia reticulata). J Comp Psychol 122:344–356
Carrete M, Tella JL (2010) Individual consistency in flight initiation distances in burrowing owls: a new hypothesis on disturbance induced habitat selection. Biol Lett 6:167–170
Carter AJ, Feeney WE, Marshall HH, Cowlishaw G, Heinsohn R (2012a) Animal personality: what are behavioural ecologists measuring? Biol Rev 88:465–475
Carter AJ, Marshall HH, Heinsohn R, Cowlishaw G (2012b) How not to measure boldness: novel object and antipredator responses are not the same in wild baboons. Anim Behav 84:603–609
Cockrem JF (2007) Stress, corticosterone and avian personalities. J Ornithol 148:169–178
Conrad JL, Weinersmith KL, Brodin T, Saltz JB, Sih A (2011) Behavioural syndromes in fishes: a review with implications for ecology and fisheries management. J Fish Biol 78:395–435
Cooper WE, Frederick WG (2007) Optimal flight initiation distance. J Theor Biol 244:59–67
Crooks KE, Soulé ME (1999) Mesopredator release and avifaunal extinctions in a fragmented system. Nature 400:563–566
Darrow PA, Shivik JA (2009) Bold, shy, and persistent: variable coyote response to light and sound stimuli. Appl Anim Behav Sci 116:82–87
Diamond JM (1986) Rapid evolution of urban birds. Nature 324:107–108
Evans J, Boudreau K, Hyman J (2010) Behavioural syndromes in urban and rural populations of song sparrows. Ethology 116:588–595
Fernandez-Juricic E, Jimenez MD, Lucas E (2002) Factors affecting intra- and inter-specific variations in the difference between alert distances and flight distances for birds in forested habitats. Can J Zool 80:1212–1220
Forkman B, Boissy A, Meunier-Salaün MC, Canali E, Jones RB (2007) A critical review of fear tests used on cattle, pigs, sheep, poultry and horses. Physiol Behav 92:340–374
Frid A, Dill L (2002) Human-caused disturbance stimuli as a form of predation risk. Conserv Ecol 6:11
Gese EM, Ruff RL, Crabtree RL (1996) Social and nutritional factors influencing the dispersal of resident coyotes. Anim Behav 52:1025–1043
Godin JGJ, Dugatkin LA (1996) Female mating preference for bold males in the guppy, Poecilia reticulata. Proc Natl Acad Sci 93:10262–10267
Hall ER (1981) The mammals of North America, 2nd edn. Wiley, NY
Harris CE, Knowlton FF (2001) Differential responses of coyotes to novel stimuli in familiar and unfamiliar settings. Can J Zool 79:2005–2013
Heffernan DJ, Andelt WF, Shivik JA (2007) Coyote investigative behavior following removal of novel stimuli. J Wildl Manag 71:587–593
Koolhaas JM, Korte SM, De Boer SF, Van Der Vegt BJ, Van Reenen CG, Hopster H, De Jong IC, Ruis MAW, Blokhuis HJ (1999) Coping styles in animals: current status in behaviour and stress physiology. Neurosci Behav Physiol 23:925–935
Metcalf BM, Davies SJ, Ladd PG (2002) Adaptation behaviour by two bird species as a result of habituation to humans. Aust Birdwatcher 18:306–312
Mettler AE, Shivik JA (2007) Dominance and neophobia in coyote (Canis latrans) breeding pairs. Appl Anim Behav Sci 102:85–94
Mills LS, Knowlton FF (1991) Coyote space use in relation to prey abundance. Can J Zool 69:1516–1521
Möeller AP, Garamszegi LZ (2012) Between individual variation in risk-taking behavior and its life history consequences. Behav Ecol 23:843–853
Möeller AP, Nielson JT (2010) Fear screams and adaptations to avoid imminent death: effects of genetic variation and predation. Ethol Ecol Evol 22:1–20
Nowak RM (1978) Evolution and taxonomy of coyotes and related Canis. In: Bekoff M (ed) Coyotes: biology, behavior and management. Academic Press, San Diego
Nyqvist MJ, Gozlan RE, Cucherousset J, Britton JR (2013) Absence of a context-general behavioural syndrome in a solitary predator. Ethology 119:1–11
Patterson BR, Messier F (2001) Social organization and space use of coyotes in eastern Canada relative to prey distribution and abundance. J Mamm 82:463–477
Podberscek AL, Serpell JA (1996) The English cocker spaniel: preliminary findings on aggressive behaviour. Appl Anim Behav Sci 47:75–89
Réale D, Gallant BY, Leblanc M, Festa-Bianchet M (2000) Consistency of temperament in bighorn ewes and correlates with behaviour and life history. Anim Behav 60:589–597
Réale D, Dingemanse NJ, Kazem AJN, Wright J (2010) Evolutionary and ecological approaches to the study of personality. Philos Trans R Soc Lond Ser B Biol Sci 365:3937–3946
Rose MD, Polis GA (1998) The distribution and abundance of coyotes: the effects of allochthonous food subsidies from the sea. Ecology 79:998–1007
Ruis MAW, Te Brake JHA, Van De Burgwal JA, De Jong IC, Blokhuis HJ, Koolhaas JM (2000) Personalities in female domesticated pigs: behavioural and physiological indications. Appl Anim Behav Sci 66:31–47
Sherman CK, Reisner IR, Taliaferro LA, Houpt KA (1996) Characteristics, treatment, and outcome of 99 cases of aggression between dogs. Appl Anim Behav Sci 47:91–108
Shivik JA, Palmer GL, Gese EM, Osthaus B (2009) Captive coyotes compared to their counterparts in the wild: does environmental enrichment help? J Appl Anim Welf Sci 12:223–235
Sih A, Bell AM, Johnson JC (2004a) Behavioural syndromes: an ecological and evolutionary overview. Trends Ecol Evol 19:372–378
Sih A, Bell AM, Johnson JC, Ziemba RE (2004b) Behavioural syndromes: an integrative overview. Q Rev Biol 79:241–277
Smith BR, Blumstein DT (2010) Behavioral types as predictors of survival in Trinidadian guppies (Poecilia reticulata). Behav Ecol 21:919–926
Stankowich T (2008) Ungulate flight responses to human disturbance: a review and meta-analysis. Biol Conserv 141:2159–2173
Stamps JA, Groothuis TGG (2010a) Developmental perspectives on personality: implications for ecological and evolutionary studies of individual differences. Philos Trans R Soc Lond Ser B Biol Sci 365:4029–4041
Stamps J, Groothuis TGG (2010b) The development of animal personality: relevance, concepts and perspectives. Biol Rev 85:301–325
Stankowich T, Blumstein D (2005) Fear in animals: a meta-analysis and review of risk assessment. Proc R Soc B 272:2627–2634
Verdolin JL, Harper J (2013) Are shy individuals less behaviorally variable? Insights from a captive population of mouse lemurs. Primates 54:309–314
Wolf M, Weissing FJ (2010) An explanatory framework for adaptive personality differences. Phil Trans Royal Soc B Biol Sci 365:3959–3968
Wolf M, Van Doorn GS, Weissing FJ (2008) Evolutionary emergence of responsive and unresponsive personalities. Proc Nat Acad Sci 105:15825–15830
Ydenberg RC, Dill LM (1986) The economics of fleeing from predators. Adv Stud Behav 16:229–249
Young SP, Jackson HHT (1951) The clever coyote. Stockpole, Harrisburg and Wildlife Management Institute, Washington, DC
Acknowledgments
Stacey Brummer and Stan Gehrt assisted with project design. We thank Stacey Brummer and Delphine Napoletano for field assistance. We are especially thankful to the NWRC staff and many volunteers that assisted with coyote captures. Heath Weaver was helpful in reviewing the manuscript. This project was funded by USDA-Wildlife Services-National Wildlife Research Center. Funding had no role in study design, collection, analysis and interpretation of data, writing, or the decision to submit the article for publication.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
About this article
Cite this article
Young, J.K., Mahe, M. & Breck, S. Evaluating behavioral syndromes in coyotes (Canis latrans). J Ethol 33, 137–144 (2015). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10164-015-0422-z
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10164-015-0422-z