Skip to main content
Log in

Extra-pair mate choice in the female great tit Parus major: good males or compatible males

  • Article
  • Published:
Journal of Ethology Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

The good genes hypothesis and the genetic compatibility hypothesis are the two main hypotheses that focus on the genetic benefit that a female can gain through her choice of a mate. We tested the two hypotheses on extra-pair mating in the great tit, Parus major. We found that female great tits choose males on the basis of breast stripe width, which is in accordance with the good genes hypothesis. Although females chose less related extra-pair males, the evidence for female choice for compatible males was overall weak. However, our data suggest a post-copulatory mechanism of inbreeding avoidance. The observed individual inbreeding coefficient, F, was similar for within-pair offspring (WPO) and extra-pair offspring (EPO). The observed individual F of WPO was lower than the expected individual F, whereas the observed F of EPO was similar to what was expected. These results highlight the importance of processes after copulation for the outcome of female mate choice. Our study shows that in a system with apparent pre-copulatory female choice for good genes, a post-copulatory mechanism may still promote the production of offspring that carry compatible genes.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Bensch S, Hasselquist D, von Schantz T (1994) Genetic similarity between parents predicts hatching failure: nonincestuous inbreeding in great reed warbler. Evolution 48:317–326

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bensch S, Price T, Kohn J (1997) Isolation and characterization of microsatellite loci in a Phylloscopus warbler. Mol Ecol 6:91–92

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Blakey JK (1994) Genetic evidence for extra-pair fertilizations in a monogamous passerine, the great tit Parus major. Ibis 136:457–462

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Blomqvist D, Andersson M, Küpper C, Cuthill IC, Kis J, Lanctot RB, Sandercock BK, Szekely T, Wallander J, Kempenaers B (2002) Genetic similarity between mates and extra-pair parentage in three species of shorebirds. Nature 419:613–615

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Bouwman KM, Burke T, Komdeur J (2006) How female reed buntings benefit from extra-pair mating behaviour: testing hypotheses through patterns of paternity in sequential broods. Mol Ecol 15:2589–2600

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Bretman A, Wedell N, Tregenza T (2004) Molecular evidence of post-copulatory inbreeding avoidance in the field cricket Gryllus bimaculatus. Proc R Soc Lond B 271:159–164

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Charmantier A, Blondel J, Perret P, Lambrechts MM (2004) Do extra-pair paternities provide genetic benefits for female blue tits Parus caeruleus? J Avian Biol 35:524–532

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Colegrave N, Kotiaho JS, Tomkins JL (2002) Mate choice or polyandry: reconciling genetic compatibility and good genes sexual selection. Evol Ecol Res 4:911–917

    Google Scholar 

  • Crawly MJ (2002) Statistical computing: an introduction to data analysis using S-plus. Wiley, England

    Google Scholar 

  • Dawson DA, Hanotte O, Grieg C, Stewart IK, Burke T (2000) Polymorphic microsatellites in the blue tit Parus caeruleus and their cross-species utility in 20 songbird families. Mol Ecol 9:1941–1944

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Delhey K, Jhonson A, Peters A, Andersson S, Kempenaers B (2003) Paternity analysis reveals opposing selection pressures on crown coloration in the blue tit (Parus caeruleus). Proc R Soc Lond B 270:2057–2063

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Foerster K, Delhey K, Johnson A, Lifjeld JT, Kempenaers B (2003) Females increase offspring heterozygosity and fitness through extra-pair matings. Nature 425:714–717

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Foerster K, Valcu A, Johnson A, Kempenears B (2006) A spatial genetic structure and effects of relatedness on mate choice in a wild bird population. Mol Ecol 15:4555–4567

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Freeman-Gallant CR, Weelwright NT, Meiklejohn KE, Sollecito SV (2006) Genetic similarity, extrapair paternity, and offspring quality in savannah sparrows (Passeruculus sandwichensis). Behav Ecol 17:952–958

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Goldstein DB, Schlötterer C (1999) Microsatellites. Oxford University Press, New York

    Google Scholar 

  • Griffin AS, West SA (2003) Kin discrimination and the benefit of helping in cooperatively breeding vertebrates. Science 302:634–636

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Griffith SC, Owens IPF, Thuman KA (2002) Extra pair paternity in birds: a review of interspecific variation and adaptive function. Mol Ecol 11:2195–2212

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Gullberg A, Tegelström H, Gelter HP (1992) DNA fingerprinting reveals multiple paternity in families of great and blue tits (Parus major and P. caeruleus). Hereditas 117:103–108

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hansson B, Jack L, Christians JK, Pemberton JM, Åkesson M, Westerdahl H, Bensch S, Hasselquist D (2007) No evidence for inbreeding avoidance in a great reed warbler population. Behav Ecol 18:157–164

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hasselquist D, Bensch S, von Schantz T (1996) Correlation between male song repertoire, extra-pair paternity and offspring survival in the great reed warbler. Nature 381:229–232

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Hatchwell BJ, Ross DJ, Fowlie MK, McGowan A (2001) Kin discrimination in cooperatively breeding long-tailed tits. Proc R Soc Lond B 268:885–890

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Jennions MD, Petrie M (2000) Why do females mate multiply? A review of the genetic benefits. Biol Rev 75:21–64

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Kawano KM (2003) Isolation of polymorphic microsatellite markers in the great tit (Parus major minor). Mol Ecol Notes 3:314–315

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Keller LF, Waller DM (2002) Inbreeding effects in wild populations. Trends Ecol Evol 17:230–241

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kempenares B, Verheyen GR, van den Broeck M, Burke T, Van Broeckhoven C, Dhondt AA (1992) Extra-pair paternity results from female preference for high-quality males in the blue tit. Nature 357:494–496

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kempenaers B, Verheyren GR, Dhondt AA (1997) Extrapair paternity in the blue tit (Parus caeruleus): female choice, male characteristics, and offspring quality. Behav Ecol 8:481–492

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kokko H, Ots I (2006) When not to avoid inbreeding. Evolution 60:467–475

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Komdeur J, Hatchwell BJ (1999) Kin recognition: function and mechanism in avian societies. Trends Ecol Evol 14:237–241

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Komdeur J, Richardson DS, Burke T (2004) Experimental evidence that kin discrimination in the Seychelles warblers based on association and not on genetic relatedness. Proc R Soc Lond B 271:963–969

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lemel J, Wallin K (1993) Status signaling, motivational condition and dominance—an experimental study in the great tit, Parus major L. Anim Behav 45:549–558

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lubjuhn T, Strohbach S, Brün J, Gerken T, Epplen J (1999a) Extra-pair paternity in great tits (Parus major)—a long-term study. Behaviour 136:1157–1172

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lubjuhn T, Gerken T, Brün J, Epplen JT (1999b) High frequency of extra-pair paternity in the Coal Tit. J Avian Biol 30:229–233

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lynch M, Ritland K (1999) Estimation of pairwise relatedness with molecular markers. Genetics 152:1753–1766

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Marshall RC, Buchanan KL, Catchpole CK (2003) Sexual selection and individual genetic diversity in a songbird. Proc R Soc Lond B (suppl.) 270: S248–S250

    Google Scholar 

  • Masters BS, Hicks BG, Johnson LS, Erb LA (2003) Genotype and extra-pair paternity in the house wren: a rare-male effect? Proc R Soc Lond B 270:1393–1397

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mays HL, Hill GE (2004) Choosing mates: good genes versus genes that are a good fit. Trends Ecol Evol 19:554–559

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • McCullagh P, Nelder JA (1989) Generalized linear models, 2nd edn. Chapman and Hall, London

    Google Scholar 

  • Neff BD, Pitcher TE (2005) Genetic quality and sexual selection: an integrated framework for good genes and compatible genes. Mol Ecol 14:19–38

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Norris K (1990) Female choice and the evolution of the conspicuous plumage coloration of monogamous male great tits. Behav Ecol Sociobiol 26:129–138

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Norris K (1993) Heritable variation in a plumage indicator of viability in male great tits Parus major. Nature 362:537–539

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Oh KP, Badyaev AV (2006) Adaptive genetic complementarity in mate choice coexists with selection for elaborate sexual traits. Proc R Soc Lond B 273:1913–1919

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Otter K, McGregor PK, Terry AM, Burford FRL, Peake TM, Dabelsteen T (1999) Do female great tits (Parus major) assess males by eavesdropping? A field study using interactive song playback. Proc R Soc Lond B 266:1305–1309

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Otter KA, Stewart IRK, McGregor PK, Terry AMR, Dabelsteen T, Burke T (2001) Extra-pair paternity among great tits Parus major following manipulation of male signals. J Avian Biol 32:338–344

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Pizzari T, Levlie H, Cornwallis CK (2004) Sex-specific, counteracting responses to inbreeding in a bird. Proc R Soc Lond B 271:2115–2121

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ritland K (1996) Estimators for pairwise relatedness and individual inbreeding coefficients. Genet Res 67:175–185

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Schmoll T, Dietrich V, Winkel W, Epplen JT, Lubjuhn T (2003) Long-term fitness consequences of female extra-pair matings in a socially monogamous passerine. Proc R Soc Lond B 270:250–264

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Schmoll T, Quellmalz A, Dietrich V, Winkel W, Epplen JT, Lubjuhn T (2005a) Genetic similarity between pair mates is not related to extrapair paternity in the socially monogamous coal tit. Anim Behav 69:1013–1022

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Schmoll T, Dietrich V, Winkel W, Epplen JT, Schurr F, Lubjuhn T (2005b) Paternal genetic effects on offspring fitness are context dependent within the extrapair mating system of a socially monogamous passerine. Evolution 59:645–657

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Senar JC, Pascual J (1997) Keel and tarsus length may provide a good predictor of avian body size. Ardea 85:269–274

    Google Scholar 

  • Simmons LW, Beveridge M, Wedell N, Tregenza T (2006) Postcopulatory inbreeding avoidance by female crickets only revealed by molecular markers. Mol Ecol 15:3817–3824

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Stewart IR, Hanschu RD, Burke T, Westneat DF (2006) Tests of ecological, phenotypic, and genetic correlates of extra-pair paternity in the house sparrow. Condor 108:399–413

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Strohbach S, Curio E, Bathen A, Epplen JT, Lubjuhn T (1998) Extrapair paternity in the great tit (Parus major): a test of the “good genes” hypothesis. Behav Ecol 9:388–396

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Tang-Martinez Z (2001) The mechanisms of kin discrimination and the evolution of kin recognition in vertebrates: a critical re-evaluation. Behav Processes 53:21–40

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Thuman KA, Griffith SC (2005) Genetic similarity and the nonrandom distribution of paternity in a genetically highly polyandrous shorebird. Anim Behav 69:765–770

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Tregenza T, Wedell N (2000) Genetic compatibility, mate choice and patterns of parentage. Mol Ecol 9:1013–1027

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Verboven N, Mateman AC (1997) Low frequency of extra-pair fertilizations in the great tit Parus major revealed by DNA fingerprinting. J Avian Biol 28:231–239

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • von Schantz T, Göransson G, Andersson G, Fröberg I, Grahn M, Helgée A, Wittzell H (1989) Female choice selects for a viability-based male trait in pheasants. Nature 337:166–169

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wilson JD (1992) A re-assessment of the significance of status signaling in populations of wild great tits, Parus major. Anim Behav 43:999–1009

    Google Scholar 

  • Zeh JA, Zeh DW (2001) Reproductive mode and the genetic benefits of polyandry. Anim Behav 61c:1051–1063

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgments

We are indebted to the members of our laboratory for their encouragement. We especially thank O. K. Mikami for his comments on this manuscript. We also thank the staff of the Nature Reserve of Fukuoka City and the staff of the Wild Bird Society of Japan in Mt. Aburayama for their cooperation with our investigation in the field. English used in this manuscript was revised by Miss K. Miller (Royal English Language Center, Fukuoka, Japan).

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Katsura M. Kawano.

About this article

Cite this article

Kawano, K.M., Yamaguchi, N., Kasuya, E. et al. Extra-pair mate choice in the female great tit Parus major: good males or compatible males. J Ethol 27, 349–359 (2009). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10164-008-0126-8

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10164-008-0126-8

Keywords

Navigation