Skip to main content
Log in

Use of self-retaining barbed suture for rectal wall closure in transanal endoscopic microsurgery

  • Original Article
  • Published:
Techniques in Coloproctology Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Background

The aim of this study was to investigate the safety and efficacy of self-retaining barbed sutures in comparison with monofilament clip-fixated sutures for rectal wall closure in transanal endoscopic microsurgery.

Methods

Horizontal full-thickness wall defects (3.5 cm) of cattle rectal specimens were closed via transanal endoscopic microsurgery using a monofilament suture with clips at the end (Surgipro® 2/0; Covidien, Mansfield, MA, USA, n = 25) or a self-retaining barbed suture (V-Loc™ 180 3/0; Covidien, Mansfield, MA, USA, n = 25). The primary endpoint was the pneumatic leakage pressure of the suture line. As a secondary endpoint, suture time was evaluated.

Results

The median pneumatic leakage pressure for barbed sutures was 45.5 mbar (range 17–106 mbar) and 33.5 mbar (range 19–106 mbar) for monofilament sutures (p = 0.58). A pneumatic leak at a critical pressure below 25 mbar occurred in 3 cases with barbed sutures and in 7 cases with monofilament sutures (p = 0.29). Median suturing time [19:25 min:s (range 12:00–33:30) vs. 20:41 (17:00–28:33), p = 0.23] did not differ between the two groups.

Conclusions

Barbed sutures display the same bursting pressure as monofilament sutures and their use for rectal wall closure seems feasible.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Morino M, Arezzo A, Allaix ME (2013) Transanal endoscopic microsurgery. Tech Coloproctol 17(Suppl 1):S55–S61

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. Saclarides TJ (2007) TEM/local excision: indications, techniques, outcomes, and the future. J Surg Oncol 96:644–650

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. Ramirez JM, Aguilella V, Arribas D, Martinez M (2002) Transanal full-thickness excision of rectal tumours: should the defect be sutured? A randomized controlled trial. Colorectal Dis 4:51–55

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Milone M, Di Minno MN, Galloro G et al (2013) Safety and efficacy of barbed suture for gastrointestinal suture: a prospective and randomized study on obese patients undergoing gastric bypass. J Laparoendosc Adv Surg Tech A 23:756–759

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Facy O, De Blasi V, Goergen M, Arru L, De Magistris L, Azagra JS (2013) Laparoscopic gastrointestinal anastomoses using knotless barbed sutures are safe and reproducible: a single-center experience with 201 patients. Surg Endosc 27:3841–3845

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Costantino F, Dente M, Perrin P, Sarhan FA, Keller P (2013) Barbed unidirectional V-Loc 180 suture in laparoscopic Roux-en-Y gastric bypass: a study comparing unidirectional barbed monofilament and multifilament absorbable suture. Surg Endosc 27:3846–3851

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Xu H, Chaturvedi R, Cheng Y et al (2004) Spermine oxidation induced by helicobacter pylori results in apoptosis and DNA damage: implications for gastric carcinogenesis. Cancer Res 64:8521–8525

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. Griffiths PR, Yang HS, Li QB et al (2004) Discrimination of normal and malignant gastric tissues with FTIR spectroscopy and principal component analysis. Guang Pu Xue Yu Guang Pu Fen Xi 24:1025–1027

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Bussière FI, Chaturvedi R, Cheng Y (2005) Spermine causes loss of innate immune response to helicobacter pylori by inhibition of inducible nitric-oxide synthase translation. J Biol Chem 280:2409–2412

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. Buess G, Hutterer F, Theiss J, Böbel M, Isselhard W, Pichlmaier H (1984) A system for a transanal endoscopic rectum operation. Chirurg 55:677–680

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. Barendse RM, Dijkgraaf MG, Rolf UR et al (2013) Colorectal surgeons’ learning curve of transanal endoscopic microsurgery. Surg Endosc 27:3591–3602

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. Rashid RM, Sartori M, White LE, Villa MT, Yoo SS, Alam M (2007) Breaking strength of barbed polypropylene sutures: rater-blinded, controlled comparison with nonbarbed sutures of various calibers. Arch Dermatol 143:869–872

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. Nemecek E, Negrin L, Beran C, Nemecek R, Hollinsky C (2013) The application of the V-Loc closure device for gastrointestinal sutures: a preliminary study. Surg Endosc 27:3830–3834

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  14. Pham KN, Sack BS, O’Connor RC et al (2013) V-Loc urethro-intestinal anastomosis during robotic cystectomy with orthotopic urinary diversion. Can Urol Assoc J 7:E663–E666

    PubMed Central  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  15. Massoud W, Thanigasalam R, El Hajj A et al (2013) Does the use of a barbed polyglyconate absorbable suture have an impact on urethral anastomosis time, urethral stenosis rates, and cost effectiveness during robot-assisted radical prostatectomy? Urology 82:90–94

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  16. Liatsikos E, Knoll T, Kyriazis I et al (2013) Unfavorable outcomes of laparoscopic pyeloplasty using barbed sutures: a multi-center experience. World J Urol 31:1441–1444

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Conflict of interest

None.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to A. Kirschniak.

Electronic supplementary material

Below is the link to the electronic supplementary material.

Supplementary material 1 (JPEG 244 kb)

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Wilhelm, P., Storz, P., Axt, S. et al. Use of self-retaining barbed suture for rectal wall closure in transanal endoscopic microsurgery. Tech Coloproctol 18, 813–816 (2014). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10151-014-1138-8

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10151-014-1138-8

Keywords

Navigation