Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Neurovascular antropylorus perineal transposition using inferior rectal nerve anastomosis for total anorectal reconstruction: preliminary report in humans

  • Original Article
  • Published:
Techniques in Coloproctology Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Background

Technical feasibility of inferior rectal nerve anastomosis to the anterior vagus branch of the perineally transposed antropyloric valve for total anorectal reconstruction has been previously demonstrated in cadavers. To the best of our knowledge, the present study is the first report of using this procedure in humans.

Methods

Eight patients [mean age 35.5 years (range 15–55 years); (male/female = 7:1)] underwent the procedure. The antropyloric valve with its anterior vagus branch was mobilized based on the left gastroepiploic arterial pedicle. The antral end was anastomosed to the distal colon. The anterior vagus nerve was anastomosed by epineural technique to the inferior rectal nerve in the perineum. A diverting proximal colostomy was maintained for 6 months. Anatomical integrity of the graft (on magnetic resonance imaging scans), its arterial pedicle (on computed tomography angiogram) and neural continuity (on ultrasound and pyloric electromyography) were assessed. Functional assessment was performed using barium retention studies, endoscopy, manometry and fecal incontinence scores.

Results

Tension-free end-to-end anastomosis of the anterior vagus nerve to the right (n = 7) and left (n = 1) inferior rectal nerve was achieved. An intact left gastroepiploic pedicle, a healthy graft and neural continuity were visualized on perineal ultrasound. Electromyographic activity was noticed on neural stimulation. Endoscopy and barium studies showed voluntary antral contraction and contrast retention, respectively, in all patients. The mean resting and squeeze pressures were 26.25 mmHg (range 16–62 mmHg) and 50.25 mmHg (range 16–113 mmHg), respectively. St. Mark’s incontinence scores varied between 7 and 12. There were no major surgical complications.

Conclusions

Pudendal (inferior rectal) innervation of the perineally transposed antropylorus in total anorectal reconstruction is feasible and may improve outcomes in selected patients with end-stage fecal incontinence.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Tjandra JJ, Lim JF, Matzel K (2004) Sacral nerve stimulation: an emerging treatment for faecal incontinence. ANZ J Surg 74:1098–1106

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. Madoff RD, Baeten CG, Christiansen J et al (2000) Standards for anal sphincter replacement. Dis Colon Rectum 43:135–141

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. Mander BJ, Abercrombie JF, George BD, Williams NS (1996) The electrically stimulated gracilis neosphincter incorporated as part of total anorectal reconstruction after abdominoperineal excision of the rectum. Ann Surg 224:702–709

    Article  CAS  PubMed Central  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Congilosi SM, Johnson DR, Medot M et al (1997) Experimental model of pudendal nerve innervation of a skeletal muscle neosphincter for faecal incontinence. Br J Surg 84:1269–1273

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Sato T, Konishi F, Kanazawa K (1997) Functional perineal colostomy with pudendal nerve anastomosis following anorectal resection: a cadaver operation study on a new procedure. Surgery 121:569–574

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Sato T, Konishi F, Kanazawa K (1997) Anal sphincter reconstruction with a pudendal nerve anastomosis following abdominoperineal resection: report of a case. Dis Colon Rectum 40:1497–1502

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Sato T, Konishi F, Endoh N, Uda H, Sugawara Y, Nagai H (2005) Long-term outcomes of a neo-anus with a pudendal nerve anastomosis contemporaneously reconstructed with an abdominoperineal excision of the rectum. Surgery 137:8–15

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. Chandra A, Kumar A, Noushif M et al (2013) Perineal antropylorus transposition for end-stage fecal incontinence in humans: initial outcomes. Dis Colon Rectum 56:360–366

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Goldsmith HS, Chandra A (2011) Pyloric valve transposition as substitute for a colostomy in humans: a preliminary report. Am J Surg 202:409–416

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. Chandra A, Ghoshal UC, Gupta V (2012) Physiological and functional evaluation of the transposed human pylorus as a distal sphincter. J Neurogastroenterol Motil 18:269–277

    Article  PubMed Central  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. Chandra A, Kumar A, Noushif M et al (2013) Feasibility of neurovascular antropylorus perineal transposition with pudendal nerve anastomosis following anorectal excision: a cadaveric study for neoanal reconstruction. Ann Coloproctol 29:7–11

    Article  PubMed Central  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. Chandra A, Gupta V, Kumar M et al (2013) Anatomical basis of antro-pyloric transposition for fecal incontinence in humans: the infrapyloric approach. Surg Radiol Anat 35:67–74

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. Rodríguez L, Rodríguez P, Neto MG et al (2012) Short-term electrical stimulation of the lower esophageal sphincter increases sphincter pressure in patients with gastroesophageal reflux disease. Neurogastroenterol Motil 24:446–450

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  14. Chandra A (2012) Reply to: should we, not could we? A commentary on “pyloric valve transposition as substitute for a colostomy in humans: a preliminary report”. Am J Surg 204:806–807

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  15. Ratani RS, Yazaki E, Scott M, Pilot MA, Williams NS (1997) Electrically stimulated smooth muscle neosphincter. Br J Surg 84:1286–1289

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  16. Madoff RD, Rosen HR, Baeten CG et al (1999) Safety and efficacy of dynamic muscle plasty for anal incontinence: lessons from a prospective, multicenter trial. Gastroenterology 116:549–556

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  17. Wolford LM, Stevao EL (2003) Considerations in nerve repair. Proc (Bayl Univ Med Cent) 16:152–156

    Google Scholar 

  18. Burnett MG, Zager EL (2004) Pathophysiology of peripheral nerve injury: a brief review. Neurosurg Focus 16:E1

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  19. Dong C, Gao W, Jia R, Li S, Shen Z, Li B (2013) Reconstruction of anorectal function through end-to-side neurography by autonomic nerves and somatic nerve in rats. J Surg Res 180:e63–e71

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  20. Canning BJ (2006) Reflex regulation of airway smooth muscle tone. J Appl Physiol 101:971–985

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  21. Guyenet PG (2006) The sympathetic control of blood pressure. Nat Rev Neurosci 7:335–346

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgments

This study was supported by fund from Grant Number 2835/Lekha/09, Department of Surgical Gastroenterology, King George Medical University, India.

Conflict of interest

The authors declare no conflicts of interest.

Ethical standard

Ethics Committee, Institutional Review Board, King George’s Medical University, Lucknow, India.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to A. Chandra.

Electronic supplementary material

Below is the link to the electronic supplementary material.

Endoscopic assessment of the perineal antropyloric segment showing the suture line (colon–antral anastomosis) and antral contractions on voluntary attempts to retain feces (MPG 4836 kb)

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Chandra, A., Kumar, A., Noushif, M. et al. Neurovascular antropylorus perineal transposition using inferior rectal nerve anastomosis for total anorectal reconstruction: preliminary report in humans. Tech Coloproctol 18, 535–542 (2014). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10151-013-1092-x

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10151-013-1092-x

Keywords

Navigation