Skip to main content
Log in

A meta-analysis of the effect of different neuroprotective drugs in management of patients with traumatic brain injury

  • Review
  • Published:
Neurosurgical Review Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Traumatic brain injury is a major problem worldwide. Our objective is to synthesize available evidence in the literature concerning the effectiveness of neuroprotective drugs (cerebrolysin, citicoline, and piracetam) on Glasgow outcome score (GOS), cognitive performance, and survival in traumatic brain injury patients. Comprehensive search of electronic databases, search engines, and conferences proceedings; hand search journals; searching reference lists of relevant articles, theses, and local publications; and contact of authors for incomplete data were performed. Studies included patients in all age groups regardless of severity of trauma. There was no publication date restriction. Two reviewers independently extracted data from each study. Fixed effect or random effects model selection depends on results of statistical tests for heterogeneity. The literature search yielded 13 studies. Patients treated with cerebrolysin (n = 112) had favorable GOS three times more than controls (OR 3.019; 95 % CI 1.76 to 5.16; p = 0.003*). The odds of cognition improvement in the treatment group was 3.4 times more than controls (OR 3.4; 95 % CI 1.82 to 5.21; p < 0.001*). Survival of cerebrolysin-treated patients did not differ from controls (103 patients; OR = 2.81; 95 % CI 0.905 to 8.76). Citicoline did not improve GOS (1355 patients; OR 0.96; 95 % CI 0.830 to 1.129; p = 0.676), cognitive performance (4 studies; 1291 patients; OR 1.35; 95 % CI 0.58 to 3.16; p = 0.478), and survival (1037 patients; OR = 1.38; 95 % CI 0.855 to 2.239). One study showed a positive effect of piracetam on cognition. Further research with high validity is needed to reach a solid conclusion about the use of neuroprotective drugs in cases of brain injury.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5
Fig. 6
Fig. 7
Fig. 8
Fig. 9
Fig. 10
Fig. 11

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. A’lvarez XA, Sampedro C et al (2008) Reduction in qEEG slowing over 1 year and after treatment with Cerebrolysin in patients with moderate-Severe traumatic brain injury. J Neural Transm 115:683–692

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. A’lvarez XA, Sampedro C, Pe’rez P, Laredo M, Couceiro V, Herna’ndez A et al (2003) Positive effects of Cerebrolysin on electroencephalogram slowing, cognition and clinical outcome in patients with postacute traumatic brain injury: an exploratory study. Int Clin Psychopharmacol 18:1–8

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. A’lvarez XA, Sampedro C, Pe’rez P, Laredo M et al (2003) Effect of Cerebrolysin on Quantitative EEG activity in elderly controls and in patients with brain damage. Eur Neuropsychopharmacol 13

  4. Aboukhabar H, Abouelela A, Shebl M (2011) Impact of administration of the neuroprotective drug cerebrolysin alone and with vitamin e on outcome of patients with severe traumatic brain injury. AJAIC 13:1–11

    Google Scholar 

  5. Adibhatla RM (2013) Citicoline in stroke and TBI clinical trials. Nat Rev Neurol:1–2

  6. Alvarez XA, Sampedro C, Pérez P (2003) Positive effects of cerebrolysin on electroencephalogram slowing, cognition and clinical outcome in patients with postacute traumatic brain injury: an exploratory study. Int Clin Psychopharmacol 18:271–278

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. American Association of neurological surgeon (AANS), Congress of Neurological Surgeons (CNS), AANS/CNS Joint Section on Neurotrauma and Critical Care (2007) Guidelines for the management of severe traumatic brain injury. J Neurotrauma 24:1–116

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Aniruddha TJ, Pillai S, Devi BI, Sampath S, Chandramouli BA (2009) Role of citicoline in the management of mild head injury. Indian J Neurotrauma 6:49–52

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Asghari M, Meshkini A, Salehpoor F, Aghazadeh, Shakeri M, Shokohi G (2014) Investigation of the effect of cerebrolysin on patients with head trauma and diffuse axonal injury. Int J Curr Res Acad Rev 2:1–8

    Google Scholar 

  10. Beattie MS, Ferguson AR, Bresnahan JC (2010) AMPA-receptor trafficking and injury-induced cell death. Eur J Neurosci 32:290–297

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  11. Borenstein M, Hedges LV, Higgins JP, Rothstein RH (2009) Converting among effect sizes. In: Introduction to meta-analysis. Wiley, London, pp 45–49

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  12. Borenstein M, Hedges LV, Higgins JP, Rothstein RH (2009) Heterogeneity. In: Introduction to meta-analysis. Wiley, London, pp 105–106

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  13. Borenstein M, Hedges LV, Higgins JP, Rothstein RH (2009) Converting among effect sizes. In: Introduction to Meta-Analysis. Wiley, pp 1–413

  14. Borenstein M, Hedges LV, Higgins JP, Rothstein RH (2009) Fixed-effect versus random-effects models. In: Introduction to Meta-Analysis. Wiley

  15. Borenstein M, Hedges LV, Higgins JP, Rothstein RH (2009) Publication bias. In: Introduction to Meta-Analysis. Wiley, pp 1–413

  16. Chen CC, Tsaia SC, Chen XX, Cho DY (2013) Cerebrolysin enhances cognitive recovery of mild traumatic brain injury patients: double-blind, placebo-controlled, randomized study. Br J Neurosurg:1–5

  17. Dempsey RJ, Raghavendra Rao VL (2003) Cytidinediphosphocholine treatment to decrease traumatic brain injury-induced hippocampal neuronal death, cortical contusion volume, and neurological dysfunction in rats. J Neurosurg 98:867–873

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  18. Donkin JJ, Vink R (2010) Mechanisms of cerebral edema in traumatic brain injury: therapeutic developments. Curr Opin Neurol 23:293–299

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  19. El Gindi S, Mahdy M, Abdel Azeem A (2001) Traumatic brain injuries in developing countries. Revista Espagnola de Neuropsicologia 3:3–11

    Google Scholar 

  20. Guyatt GH, Oxman AD, Vist GE et al (2008) GRADE Working Group: GRADE: an emerging consensus on rating quality of evidence and strength of recommendations. BMJ 336:924–926

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  21. Higgins JPT, Green S (editors) (2011) Cochrane handbook for systematic reviews of interventions version 5.1.0 [updated March 2011]. The Cochrane Collaboration

  22. Iznak FA, Iznak VE, Zavadenko NN, Guzilova SL (2008) Neurophysiological indices of CNS plasticity in the course of treatment of head trauma in adolescents. Hum Physiol 34:672–677

    Article  Google Scholar 

  23. Jain KK (2011) The handbook of neuroprotection (neuroprotection in traumatic brain injury). Springer Science & Business Media:271–254

  24. Levin HS (1991) Treatment of postconcussional symptoms with CDP-choline. J Neurol Sci 103:1–4

    Article  Google Scholar 

  25. Lozano R (1991) CDP-choline in the treatment of cranio-encephalic traumata. J Neurol Sci 103, Supplement:43–47. doi:10.1016/0022-510X(91)90008-U

  26. Maldonado V, Perez JBC, Escario JAE (1991) Effects of CDP-choline on the recovery of patients with head injury. J Neurol Sci 103:1–4

    Google Scholar 

  27. Meierhans R, Béchir M, Ludwig S (2010) Brain metabolism is significantly impaired at blood glucose below 6 mM and brain glucose below 1 mM in patients with severe traumatic brain injury. Crit Care 14:1–13

    Article  Google Scholar 

  28. Mondello S, Papa L, Buki A (2011) Neuronal and glial markers are differently associated with computed tomography findings and outcome in patients with severe traumatic brain injury: a case control study. Crit Care J 15:R156

    Article  Google Scholar 

  29. Onose G, Mureşanu DF, Ciurea AV, Chendreanu CD, Mihaescu AS et al (2009) Neuroprotective and consequent neurorehabilitative clinical outcomes, in patients treated with the pleiotropic drug cerebrolysin. J Med Life 2:350–360

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  30. Petzold A, Tisdall MM, Girbes AR (2011) In vivo monitoring of neuronal loss in traumatic brain injury: a microdialysis study. Brain 134:464–483

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  31. Sample PL, Johns N, Gabella B, Langlois J (2004) Can traumatic brain injury surveillance systems be used to link individuals with TBI to services? Brain 18:1177–1189

    Google Scholar 

  32. Secades JJ (2011) Citicoline: pharmacological and clinical review, 2010 update. Rev Neurol 52:1–63

    Google Scholar 

  33. Stahel PF, Smith WR, Moore EE (2008) Hypoxia and hypotension, the ‘lethal duo’ in traumatic brain injury: implications for prehospital care. Intensive Care Med 34:402–404

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  34. Teasdale G, Jennett B (1974) Assessment of coma and impaired sonciousness. A practical scale. Lancet 2:81–84

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  35. Vilalta A, Sahuquillo J, Merino MA (2011) Normobaric hyperoxia in traumatic brain injury: does brain metabolic state influence the response to hyperoxic challenge? J Neurotrauma 28:1139–1148

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  36. Wai S Poon The CAPTAIN Trial: Cerebrolysin Asian Pacific Trial in Acute Brain Injury and Neurorecovery. ClinicalTrialsgov Identifier:NCT01606111

  37. Walcott BP, Kahle KT, Simard JM (2012) Novel treatment targets for cerebral edema. Neurotherapeutics 9:65–72

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  38. Wong GKC, Zhu XL, Poon WS (2005) Beneficial effect of cerebrolysin on moderate and severe head injury patients: result of a cohort study. Acta Neurochir:59–60

  39. Xu Y, McArthur DL, Alger JR (2010) Early nonischemic oxidative metabolic dysfunction leads to chronic brain atrophy in traumatic brain injury. J Cereb Blood Flow Metab 30:883–894

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  40. Zafonte RD, Bagiella E, Ansel BM, Novack TA, Friedewald WT, Hesdorffer DC, Timmons SD (2012) Effect of Citicoline on functional and cognitive status among patients with traumatic brain injury citicoline brain injury treatment trial (COBRIT). JAMA 308:1–8

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Iman El Sayed.

Ethics declarations

Conflict of interest

Funding agencies had no role in the design or conduct of the study, including study identification, collection, management, analysis and interpretation of the data, or preparation, review of the final manuscript for publication. No role for institutional financial support.

The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.

Electronic supplementary material

Below is the link to the electronic supplementary material.

ESM 1

(DOCX 29 kb)

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

El Sayed, I., Zaki, A., Fayed, A.M. et al. A meta-analysis of the effect of different neuroprotective drugs in management of patients with traumatic brain injury. Neurosurg Rev 41, 427–438 (2018). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10143-016-0775-y

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10143-016-0775-y

Keywords

Navigation