Skip to main content

Advertisement

SpringerLink
Log in

Enhancement of the pulmonary arteries and thoracic aorta: comparison of a biphasic contrast injection and fixed delay protocol with a monophasic injection and a timing bolus protocol

  • Original Article
  • Published:
Emergency Radiology Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

The definitive diagnosis of pulmonary embolism, a significant cause of morbidity and mortality, relies on imaging. In this study, we compare the conventional computed tomography pulmonary angiogram (CTPA) protocol to a double-rule out CT angiogram (DRO CTA) protocol in terms of vascular enhancement, radiation dose, and contrast volume delivered. The CTPA protocol involves injection of a timing bolus for localization of the pulmonary artery, whereas the DRO CTA protocol involves a biphasic contrast. We analyzed 248 consecutive CTPA studies and 242 consecutive DRO CTA studies. Vessel enhancement using region of interest (ROI) measurements, radiation dose delivered, and total contrast volume administered was recorded. The enhancement of all vessels measured was statistically significantly higher with the biphasic DRO CTA protocol than the CTPA protocol. The difference in mean vascular enhancement for the two protocols was greatest in the descending aorta (DA, P < 0.001) and least in the main pulmonary artery (MPA, P = 0.001). The percent of studies with vascular enhancement ≥250 Hounsfield units (HU) was significantly greater in all vascular beds except the MPA when the DRO CTA protocol was used. Studies performed with the DRO CTA protocol led to less radiation exposure and used less contrast than those performed with the CTPA protocol (P < 0.001 for both). According to the final radiology report, 35.08 % of studies in the CTPA group and 22.31 % of studies in the DRO CTA group were considered indeterminate (P = 0.001). In conclusion, the biphasic DRO CTA protocol leads to statistically significantly higher opacification of all pulmonary arterial and aortic vessels studied, with no greater delivery of radiation or contrast, than the monophasic CTPA protocol.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Anderson FA, Wheeler HB, Goldberg RJ et al (1991) A population-based perspective of the hospital incidence and case-fatality rates of deep vein thrombosis and pulmonary embolism. the Worcester DVT study. Arch Intern Med 151:933–8

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. Heit JA, Rooke TW, Silverstein MD et al (2001) Trends in the incidence of venous stasis syndrome and venous ulcer: a 25-year population-based study. J Vasc Surg 33:1022–7. doi:10.1067/mva.2001.113308

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. Goldhaber SZ, Visani L, De Rosa M (1999) Acute pulmonary embolism: clinical outcomes in the international cooperative pulmonary embolism registry (ICOPER). Lancet 353:1386–9

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Bettmann MA, Baginski SG, White RD et al (2012) ACR Appropriateness Criteria® acute chest pain–suspected pulmonary embolism. J Thorac Imaging 27:W28–31. doi:10.1097/RTI.0b013e31823efeb6

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Remy-Jardin M, Remy J, Wattinne L, Giraud F (1992) Central pulmonary thromboembolism: diagnosis with spiral volumetric CT with the single-breath-hold technique–comparison with pulmonary angiography. Radiology 185:381–7. doi:10.1148/radiology.185.2.1410342

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Garg K, Welsh CH, Feyerabend AJ et al (1998) Pulmonary embolism: diagnosis with spiral CT and ventilation-perfusion scanning–correlation with pulmonary angiographic results or clinical outcome. Radiology 208:201–8. doi:10.1148/radiology.208.1.9646814

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Mayo JR, Remy-Jardin M, Müller NL et al (1997) Pulmonary embolism: prospective comparison of spiral CT with ventilation-perfusion scintigraphy. Radiology 205:447–52. doi:10.1148/radiology.205.2.9356627

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. Blachere H, Latrabe V, Montaudon M et al (2000) Pulmonary embolism revealed on helical CT angiography: comparison with ventilation-perfusion radionuclide lung scanning. AJR Am J Roentgenol 174:1041–7. doi:10.2214/ajr.174.4.1741041

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Remy-Jardin M, Remy J, Baghaie F et al (2000) Clinical value of thin collimation in the diagnostic workup of pulmonary embolism. AJR Am J Roentgenol 175:407–11. doi:10.2214/ajr.175.2.1750407

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. Coche E, Verschuren F, Keyeux A et al (2003) Diagnosis of acute pulmonary embolism in outpatients: comparison of thin-collimation multi-detector row spiral CT and planar ventilation-perfusion scintigraphy. Radiology 229:757–65. doi:10.1148/radiol.2293020889

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. Henk CB, Grampp S, Linnau KF et al (2003) Suspected pulmonary embolism: enhancement of pulmonary arteries at deep-inspiration CT angiography–influence of patent foramen ovale and atrial-septal defect. Radiology 226:749–55. doi:10.1148/radiol.2263012200

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. Cereser L, Bagatto D, Girometti R et al (2011) Chest multidetector computed tomography (MDCT) in patients with suspected acute pulmonary embolism: diagnostic yield and proportion of other clinically relevant findings. Radiol Med 116:219–29. doi:10.1007/s11547-010-0612-2

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. Grishina A, Haramati LB, Hoppenfeld B, Freeman LM (2002) Utilization of CT-PA in an emergency department with readily available V/Q scintigraphy. Emerg Radiol 9:75–8. doi:10.1007/s10140-002-0197-8

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  14. Costa AF, Basseri H, Sheikh A et al (2014) The yield of CT pulmonary angiograms to exclude acute pulmonary embolism. Emerg Radiol 21:133–41. doi:10.1007/s10140-013-1169-x

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  15. Jones SE, Wittram C (2005) The indeterminate CT pulmonary angiogram: imaging characteristics and patient clinical outcome. Radiology 237:329–37. doi:10.1148/radiol.2371041520

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  16. Heyer CM, Mohr PS, Lemburg SP et al (2007) Image quality and radiation exposure at pulmonary CT angiography with 100- or 120-kVp protocol: prospective randomized study. Radiology 245:577–83. doi:10.1148/radiol.2452061919

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  17. Becker CR, Hong C, Knez A et al (2003) Optimal contrast application for cardiac 4-detector-row computed tomography. Invest Radiol 38:690–4. doi:10.1097/01.rli.0000084886.44676.e4

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  18. Chen YH, Velayudhan V, Weltman DI et al (2008) Waiting to exhale: salvaging the nondiagnostic CT pulmonary angiogram by using expiratory imaging to improve contrast dynamics. Emerg Radiol 15:161–9. doi:10.1007/s10140-007-0695-9

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  19. Platt JF, Reige KA, Ellis JH (1999) Aortic enhancement during abdominal CT angiography: correlation with test injections, flow rates, and patient demographics. AJR Am J Roentgenol 172:53–6. doi:10.2214/ajr.172.1.9888738

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  20. Bae KT (2003) Peak contrast enhancement in CT and MR angiography: when does it occur and why? pharmacokinetic study in a porcine model. Radiology 227:809–16. doi:10.1148/radiol.2273020102

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgments

The first author would like to thank the Poncin Scholarship Research Foundation for funding the time during which the research was conducted.

Conflict of interest

The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Anesthesiology and Pain Medicine, University of Washington Medical Center, 1959 NE Pacific St, Box 356540, 98195, Seattle, WA, USA

    Anda M. Cornea

  2. Radia, Inc., Everett, WA and Department of Health Services, University of Washington Medical Center, Seattle, WA, USA

    Brendan J. McCullough

  3. Department of Radiology, University of Washington Medical Center, Seattle, WA, USA

    Lee M. Mitsumori & Martin L. D. Gunn

Authors
  1. Anda M. Cornea
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Brendan J. McCullough
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. Lee M. Mitsumori
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  4. Martin L. D. Gunn
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Anda M. Cornea.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Cornea, A.M., McCullough, B.J., Mitsumori, L.M. et al. Enhancement of the pulmonary arteries and thoracic aorta: comparison of a biphasic contrast injection and fixed delay protocol with a monophasic injection and a timing bolus protocol. Emerg Radiol 22, 231–237 (2015). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10140-014-1269-2

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10140-014-1269-2

Keywords

Search

Navigation