Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

128-Slice dual source coronary CTA: defining optimal arterial enhancement levels

  • Original Article
  • Published:
Emergency Radiology Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

This study aims to correlate coronary artery enhancement levels with quality of vessel visualization and calcified plaque visualization using a 128-slice dual-source CT (DSCT) scanner. Coronary CT angiography exams from 52 patients, mean age of 55 years (range, 22–90) and mean weight of 184 lbs (range, 120–320 lbs), were reviewed retrospectively. Contrast infusion rates ranged from 4.5 to 7 mL/s (mean, 5.8 mL/s). Postcontrast density of the largest calcified plaque and postcontrast density of the left main (LM) and right coronary arteries (RCA) were recorded. Enhancement quality was graded as 1 = suboptimal, 2 = adequate for diagnosis, and 3 = excellent. Pre- and postcontrast acquisitions were compared for calcified plaque conspicuity. The largest calcified plaque density was a mean of 862 HU (range, 376 to 1,384 HU) on the postcontrast scan. The mean LM and RCA coronary artery enhancement levels for studies of excellent enhancement quality (N = 43) were 468 and 457 HU, respectively, higher than mean enhancement levels of 320 and 322 HU for adequate enhancement quality (N = 8) (p < 0.0001 and 0.009). One study was graded as a nondiagnostic enhancement quality. Twenty-five subjects had calcified plaque, 3/8 with adequate and 22/43 with excellent enhancement quality. At least one calcified plaque measuring <2 mm was isodense to contrast enhancement on axial images in 5/25; all five were in the highest enhancement quality group. High coronary artery enhancement quality using 128-DSCT is associated with mean proximal coronary artery enhancement levels over 400 HU. High levels of enhancement may obscure small, calcified plaques.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Fig. 1
Fig. 2

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Burgstahler C, Reimann A, Brodoefel H, Daferner U, Herberts T, Tsiflikas I, Thomas C, Drosch T, Schroeder S, Heuschmid M (2009) Quantitative parameters to compare image quality of non-invasive coronary angiography with 16-slice, 64-slice and dual-source computed tomography. Eur Radiol 19:584–590

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. Donnino R, Jacobs JE, Doshi JV, Hecht EM, Kim DC, Babb JS, Srichai MB (2009) Dual-source versus single-source cardiac CT angiography: comparison of diagnostic image quality. AJR 192:1051–1056

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. Pannu HK, Johnson PT, Fishman EK (2009) 64 Slice multi-detector row cardiac CT. Emerg Radiol 16:1–10

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Achenbach S, Goroll T, Seltmann M, Pflederer T, Anders K, Ropers D, Daniel WG, Uder M, Lell M, Marwan M (2011) Detection of coronary artery stenoses by low-dose, prospectively ECG-triggered, high-pitch spiral coronary CT angiography. JACC Cardiovasc Imaging 4:328–337

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Becker CR, Hong C, Knez A, Leber A, Bruening R, Schoepf UJ, Reiser MF (2003) Optimal contrast application for cardiac 4-detector-row computed tomography. Investig Radiol 38:690–694

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Cademartiri F, Maffei E, Palumbo AA, Malago R, La Grutta L, Meiijboom WB, Aldrovandi A, Fusaro M, Vignali L, Menozzi A, Brambilla V, Coruzzi P, Midiri M, Kirchin MA, Mollet NR, Krestin GP (2008) Influence of intra-coronary enhancement on diagnostic accuracy with 64-slice CT coronary angiography. Eur Radiol 18:576–583

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Stolzmann P, Leschka S, Scheffel H, Krauss T, Desbiolles L, Plass A, Genoni M, Flohr TG, Wildermuth S, Marincek B, Alkadhi H (2008) Dual-source CT in step-and-shoot mode: noninvasive coronary angiography with low radiation dose. Radiology 249:71–80

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. Weininger M, Barraza JM, Kemper CA, Kalafut JF, Costello P, Schoepf UJ (2011) Cardiothoracic CT angiography: current contrast medium delivery strategies. AJR 196:W260–W72

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Johnson TR, Nikolaou K, Wintersperger BJ, Fink C, Rist C, Leber AW, Knez A, Reiser MF, Becker CR (2007) Optimization of contrast material administration for electrocardiogram-gated computed tomographic angiography of the chest. J Comput Assist Tomogr 31:265–271

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Conflict of Interest

The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Russell H. Morgan Department of Radiology, Johns Hopkins Hospital, Baltimore, MD, USA

    Ashkan A. Malayeri, Stefan L. Zimmerman, Elliot K. Fishman & Pamela T. Johnson

  2. Department of Radiology, UCSF Medical Center, San Francisco, CA, USA

    Spencer T. Lake

  3. The Russell H. Morgan Department of Radiology and Radiologic Science, Johns Hopkins School of Medicine, 601N, Caroline Street, Room 3140D, Baltimore, MD, 21287, USA

    Pamela T. Johnson

Authors
  1. Ashkan A. Malayeri
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Stefan L. Zimmerman
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. Spencer T. Lake
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  4. Elliot K. Fishman
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  5. Pamela T. Johnson
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Pamela T. Johnson.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Malayeri, A.A., Zimmerman, S.L., Lake, S.T. et al. 128-Slice dual source coronary CTA: defining optimal arterial enhancement levels. Emerg Radiol 21, 499–504 (2014). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10140-014-1214-4

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10140-014-1214-4

Keywords

Search

Navigation