Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Influence of lasing parameters on the cleaning efficacy of laser-activated irrigation with pulsed erbium lasers

  • Original Article
  • Published:
Lasers in Medical Science Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Laser-activated irrigation (LAI) using erbium lasers is an irrigant agitation technique with great potential for improved cleaning of the root canal system, as shown in many in vitro studies. However, lasing parameters for LAI vary considerably and their influence remains unclear. Therefore, this study sought to investigate the influence of pulse energy, pulse frequency, pulse length, irradiation time and fibre tip shape, position and diameter on the cleaning efficacy of LAI. Transparent resin blocks containing standardized root canals (apical diameter of 0.4 mm, 6 % taper, 15 mm long, with a coronal reservoir) were used as the test model. A standardized groove in the apical part of each canal wall was packed with stained dentin debris. The canals were filled with irrigant, which was activated by an erbium: yttrium aluminium garnet (Er:YAG) laser (2940 nm, AT Fidelis, Fotona, Ljubljana, Slovenia). In each experiment, one laser parameter was varied, while the others remained constant. In this way, the influence of pulse energy (10–40 mJ), pulse length (50–1000 μs), frequency (5–30 Hz), irradiation time (5–40 s) and fibre tip shape (flat or conical), position (pulp chamber, canal entrance, next to groove) and diameter (300–600 μm) was determined by treating 20 canals per parameter. The amount of debris remaining in the groove after each LAI procedure was scored and compared among the different treatments. The parameters significantly (P < 0.05, Kruskal–Wallis) affecting debris removal from the groove were fibre tip position, pulse length, pulse energy, irradiation time and frequency. Fibre tip shape and diameter had no significant influence on the cleaning efficacy.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Fig. 1

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Paque F, Boessler C, Zehnder M (2011) Accumulated hard tissue debris levels in mesial roots of mandibular molars after sequential irrigation steps. Int Endod J 44:148–153

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. Boutsioukis C, Lambrianidis T, Kastrinakis E (2009) Irrigant flow within a prepared root canal using various flow rates: a computational fluid dynamics study. Int Endod J 42:144–155

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. Wu MK, Wesselink PR (2001) A primary observation on the preparation and obturation of oval canals. Int Endod J 34:137–141

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Gu LS, Kim JR, Ling J, Choi KK, Pashley DH, Tay FR (2009) Review of contemporary irrigant agitation techniques and devices. J Endod 35:791–804

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. de Groot SD, Verhaagen B, Versluis M, Wu MK, Wesselink PR, van der Sluis LW (2009) Laser-activated irrigation within root canals: cleaning efficacy and flow visualization. Int Endod J 42:1077–1083

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Blanken J, Verdaasdonk R (2007) Cavitation as a working mechanism of the Er, Cr:YSGG laser in endodontics: a visualization study. J Oral Laser Appl 7:97–106

    Google Scholar 

  7. Blanken J, De Moor RJ, Meire M, Verdaasdonk R (2009) Laser induced explosive vapor and cavitation resulting in effective irrigation of the root canal. Part 1: a visualization study. Lasers Surg Med 41:514–519

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. Matsumoto H, Yoshimine Y, Akamine A (2011) Visualization of irrigant flow and cavitation induced by Er:YAG laser within a root canal model. J Endod 37:839–843

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Esenaliev RO, Oraevsky AA, Letokhov VS, Karabutov AA, Malinsky TV (1993) Studies of acoustical and shock waves in the pulsed laser ablation of biotissue. Lasers Surg Med 13:470–484

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. De Moor RJ, Blanken J, Meire M, Verdaasdonk R (2009) Laser induced explosive vapor and cavitation resulting in effective irrigation of the root canal. Part 2: evaluation of the efficacy. Lasers Surg Med 41:520–523

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. De Moor RJ, Meire M, Goharkhay K, Moritz A, Vanobbergen J (2010) Efficacy of ultrasonic versus laser-activated irrigation to remove artificially placed dentin debris plugs. J Endod 36:1580–1583

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. Deleu E, Meire MA, De Moor RJ (2015) Efficacy of laser-based irrigant activation methods in removing debris from simulated root canal irregularities. Lasers Med Sci 30:831–835

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. Lloyd A, Uhles JP, Clement DJ, Garcia-Godoy F (2014) Elimination of intracanal tissue and debris through a novel laser-activated system assessed using high-resolution micro-computed tomography: a pilot study. J Endod 40:584–587

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  14. Divito E, Peters OA, Olivi G (2012) Effectiveness of the erbium:YAG laser and new design radial and stripped tips in removing the smear layer after root canal instrumentation. Lasers Med Sci 27:273–280

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  15. George R, Meyers IA, Walsh LJ (2008) Laser activation of endodontic irrigants with improved conical laser fiber tips for removing smear layer in the apical third of the root canal. J Endod 34:1524–1527

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  16. Peeters HH, Suardita K (2011) Efficacy of smear layer removal at the root tip by using ethylenediaminetetraacetic acid and erbium, chromium: yttrium, scandium, gallium garnet laser. J Endod 37:1585–1589

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  17. Guidotti R, Merigo E, Fornaini C, Rocca JP, Medioni E, Vescovi P (2014) Er:YAG 2,940-nm laser fiber in endodontic treatment: a help in removing smear layer. Lasers Med Sci 29:69–75

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  18. Peters OA, Bardsley S, Fong J, Pandher G, Divito E (2011) Disinfection of root canals with photon-initiated photoacoustic streaming. J Endod 37:1008–1012

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  19. Ordinola-Zapata R, Bramante CM, Aprecio RM, Handysides R, Jaramillo DE (2014) Biofilm removal by 6% sodium hypochlorite activated by different irrigation techniques. Int Endod J 47:659–666

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  20. Pedulla E, Genovese C, Campagna E, Tempera G, Rapisarda E (2012) Decontamination efficacy of photon-initiated photoacoustic streaming (PIPS) of irrigants using low-energy laser settings: an ex vivo study. Int Endod J 45:865–870

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  21. Lin CP, Stern D, Puliafito CA (1990) High-speed photography of Er: YAG laser ablation in fluid. Implication for laser vitreous surgery. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci 31:2546–2550

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  22. Mrochen M, Riedel P, Donitzky C, Seiler T (2001) Erbium: yttrium-aluminum-garnet laser induced vapor bubbles as a function of the quartz fiber tip geometry. J Biomed Opt 6:344–350

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  23. Gregorcic P, Jezersek M, Mozina J (2012) Optodynamic energy-conversion efficiency during an Er:YAG-laser-pulse delivery into a liquid through different fiber-tip geometries. J Biomed Opt 17:075006

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  24. George R, Walsh LJ (2008) Apical extrusion of root canal irrigants when using Er:YAG and Er, Cr:YSGG lasers with optical fibers: an in vitro dye study. J Endod 34:706–708

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  25. Arslan H, Akcay M, Ertas H, Capar ID, Saygili G, Mese M (2014) Effect of PIPS technique at different power settings on irrigating solution extrusion. Lasers Med Sci 30:1641–1645

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  26. Meire MA, Poelman D, De Moor RJ (2014) Optical properties of root canal irrigants in the 300–3,000-nm wavelength region. Lasers Med Sci 29:1557–1562

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  27. Jiang LM, Verhaagen B, Versluis M, van der Sluis LW (2010) Evaluation of a sonic device designed to activate irrigant in the root canal. J Endod 36:143–146

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Roeland J. De Moor.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Meire, M.A., Havelaerts, S. & De Moor, R.J. Influence of lasing parameters on the cleaning efficacy of laser-activated irrigation with pulsed erbium lasers. Lasers Med Sci 31, 653–658 (2016). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10103-016-1892-0

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10103-016-1892-0

Keywords

Navigation