Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

The effect of post surface treatments on the bond strength of fiber posts to root surfaces

  • Original Article
  • Published:
Lasers in Medical Science Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

The aim of the present study was to evaluate the influence of post surface treatment methods on the push-out bond strength of adhesively luted quartz fiber posts. Thirty freshly extracted and endodontically treated human incisor teeth were prepared for quartz fiber posts. The posts were submitted to three different surface treatments (n = 10), including no treatment, 50-µm aluminum-oxide (Al2O3) airborne-particle abrasion and Er:YAG laser (10 Hz, 150 mJ) irradiation. The posts were luted with resin cement. Each root was sectioned perpendicularly to its long axis to create specimens of 1-mm thickness. After the specimens were stored in distilled water at 37°C for 24 h, their push-out bond strength was tested using a universal testing machine at a crosshead speed of 1 mm/min. The data were analyzed by two-way ANOVA (α = .05). The two-way ANOVA indicated that push-out test values did not vary significantly according to surface treatments applied (control, airborne particle abrasion, Er:YAG laser irradiation) (p > 0.05), however, values varied according to the root segments (cervical, middle, and apical) (p < 0.01). The push-out bond strength values of the coronal root sections were the highest (p < 0.05) and there were no significant differences between the middle and apical root sections in push-out bond strength of fiber posts (p > 0.05). Air-borne particle abrasion or Er:YAG laser irradiation applied on the quartz fiber posts did not affect the push-out bond strengths relative to the root surfaces. The highest bond strength was observed in the cervical third of the roots in all groups.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Assif D, Gorfil C (1994) Biomechanical considerations in restoring endodontically treated teeth. J Prosthet Dent 71:565–567

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  2. Bitter K, Kielbassa AM (2007) Post-endodontic restorations with adhesively luted fiber-reinforced composite post systems: a review. Am J Dent 20:353–360

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. Fredriksson M, Astback J, Pamenius M, Arvidson K (1998) A retrospective study of 236 patients with teeth restored by carbon fiber-reinforced epoxy resin posts. J Prosthet Dent 80:151–157

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  4. Malferrari S, Monaco C, Scotti R (2003) Clinical evaluation of teeth restored with quartz fiber-reinforced epoxy resin posts. Int J Prosthodont 16:39–44

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Radovic I, Monticelli F, Goracci C, Cury AH, Coniglio I, Vulicevic ZR et al (2007) The effect of sandblasting on adhesion of a dual cured resin composite to methacrylic fiber posts: microtensile bond strength and SEM evaluation. J Dent 35:496–502

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  6. Boschian Pest L, Cavalli G, Bertani P, Gagliani M (2002) Adhesive post-endodontic restorations with fiber-posts: push-out tests and SEM observations. Dent Mater 18(596):602

    Google Scholar 

  7. Balbosh A, Kern M (2006) Effect of surface treatment on retention of glass-fiber endodontic posts. J Prosthet Dent 95:218–223

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  8. Ferrari M, Vichi A, Garcia-Godoy F (2000) Clinical evaluation of fiber-reinforced epoxy resin posts and cast post and cores. Am J Dent 13:B15–B18

    Google Scholar 

  9. Schwartz RS, Robbins JW (2004) Post placement and restoration of endodontically treated teeth: a literature review. J Endod 30:289–301

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. Kedici SP, Aksut AA, Kilicarslan MA, Bayramoglu G, Gokdemir K (1998) Corrosion behaviour of dental metals and alloys in different media. J Oral Rehabil 25:800–808

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  11. Sahafi A, Peutzfeldt A, Asmussen E, Gotfredsen K (2003) Bond strength of resin cement to dentin and to surface-treated posts of titanium alloy, glass fiber, and zirconia. J Adhes Dent 5:153–162

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. Nergiz I, Schmage P, Platzer U, McMullan-Vogel CG (1997) Effect of different surface textures on retentive strength of tapered posts. J Prosthet Dent 78:451–457

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  13. Tjan AH, Whang SB, Miller GD (1984) The effect of a corrugated channel on the retentive properties of an obturator-reinforced composite resin dowel-core system. J Prosthet Dent 51:347–352

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  14. Goldberg AJ, Burstone CJ (1992) The use of continuous fiber reinforcement in dentistry. Dent Mater 8:197–202

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  15. Ferrari M, Cagidiaco MC, Goracci C, Vichi A, Mason PN, Radovic I et al (2007) Long-term retrospective study of the clinical performance of fiber posts. Am J Dent 20:287–291

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  16. Vichi A, Grandini S, Davidson CL, Ferrari M (2002) An SEM evaluation of several adhesive systems used for bonding fiber posts under clinical conditions. Dent Mater 18:495–502

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  17. Monticelli F, Osorio R, Toledano M, Goracci C, Tay FR, Ferrari M (2006) Improving the quality of the quartz fiber postcore bond using sodium ethoxide etching and combined silane/adhesive coupling. J Endod 32:447–451

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  18. Ferrari M, Vichi A, Mannocci F, Mason PN (2000) Retrospective study of the clinical performance of fiber posts. Am J Dent 13(Spec No):9B–13B

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  19. Mannocci F, Sheriff M, Watson TF, Vallittu PK (2005) Penetration of bonding resins into fibre-reinforced composite posts: a confocal microscopic study. Int Endod J 38:46–51

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  20. Bitter K, Noetzel J, Neumann K, Kielbassa AM (2007) Effect of silanization on bond strengths of fiber posts to various resin cements. Quintessence Int 38:121–128

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  21. Kim JT, Cho SA (2009) The effects of laser etching on shear bond strength at the titanium ceramic interface. J Prosthet Dent 101:101–106

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  22. Yilmaz A, Akyil MS, Hologlu B (2011) The effect of metal primer application and Nd:YAG laser irradiation on the shear-bond strength between polymethyl methacrylate and cobalt-chromium alloy. Jan 29(1):39–45

    Google Scholar 

  23. Magni E, Mazzitelli C, Papacchini F, Radovic I, Goracci C, Coniglio I et al (2007) Adhesion between fiber posts and resin luting agents: a microtensile bond strength test and an SEM investigation following different treatments of the post surface. J Adhes Dent 9:195–202

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  24. Valandro LF, Yoshiga S, de Melo RM, Galhano GA, Mallmann A, Marinho CP et al (2006) Microtensile bond strength between a quartz fiber post and a resin cement: effect of post surface conditioning. J Adhes Dent 8:105–111

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  25. Monticelli F, Toledano M, Tay FR, Cury AH, Goracci C, Ferrari M (2006) Post-surface conditioning improves interfacial adhesion in post/core restorations. Dent Mater 22:602–609

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  26. Vano M, Goracci C, Monticelli F, Tognini F, Gabriele M, Tay FR et al (2006) The adhesion between fibre posts and composite resin cores: the evaluation of microtensile bond strength following various surface chemical treatments to posts. Int Endod J 39:31–39

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  27. Arcoria CJ, Lippas MG, Vitasek BA (1993) Enamel surface roughness analysis after laser ablation and acid-etching. J Oral Rehabil 20:213–224

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  28. Murray AK, Atrill DC, Dickinson MR (2005) The effects of XeCl laser etching of Ni-Cr alloy on bond strengths to composite resin: a comparison with sandblasting procedures. Dent Mater 21:538–544

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  29. Akova T, Ucar Y, Tukay A, Balkaya MC, Brantley WA (2008) Comparison of the bond strength of laser-sintered and cast base metal dental alloys to porcelains. Dent Mater 24:1400–1404

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  30. Choi Y, Pae A, Park EJ, Wright RF (2010) The effect of surface treatment of fiber-reinforced posts on adhesion of a resin-based luting agent. J Prosthet Dent 103:362–368

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  31. Aksornmuang J, Nakajima M, Foxton RM, Tagami J (2006) Regional bond strengths of a dual-cure resin core material to translucent quartz fiber post. Am J Dent 19:51–55

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  32. Goracci C, Raffaelli O, Monticelli F, Balleri B, Bertelli E, Ferrari M (2005) The adhesion between prefabricated FRC posts and composite resin cores: microtensile bond strength with and without post-silanization. Dent Mater 21:437–444

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  33. Mannocci F, Ferrari M, Watson TF (2001) Microleakage of endodontically treated teeth restored with fiber posts and composite cores after cyclic loading: a confocal microscopic study. J Prosthet Dent 85:284–291

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  34. Pest LB, Cavalli G, Bertani P, Gagliani M (2002) Adhesive post-endodontic restorations with fiber posts: push-out tests and SEM observations. Dent Mater 18:596–602

    Article  Google Scholar 

  35. Torbjomer A, Karlsson S, Odman PA (1995) Survival rate and failure characteristics for two post designs. J Prosthet Dent 73:439–444

    Article  Google Scholar 

  36. Gluskin AH, Radke RA, Frost SL, Watanabe LG (1995) The mandibular incisor: rethinking guidelines for post and core design. J Endod 21:33–37

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  37. Sorensen JA, Martinoff JT (1985) Endodontically treated teeth as abutments. J Prosthet Dent 53:631–636

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  38. Sorensen JA, Martinoff JT (1984) Clinically significant factors in dowel design. J Prosthet Dent 52:28–35

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  39. Tjan AH, Whang SB (1983) Retentive properties of some simplified dowel-core systems to cast-gold dowel and core. J Prosthet Dent 50:203–206

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  40. Ozcan M, Vallittu PK (2004) Effect of surface conditioning methods on the bond strength of luting cements to ceramics. Dent Mater 19:725–731

    Article  Google Scholar 

  41. Addison O, Fleming GJP (2004) The influence of cement lute, thermocycling and surface preparation on the strength of a porcelain veneering material. Dent Mater 20:286–292

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

This study was supported by the Mustafa Kemal University, Scientific Research Section.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Ali Riza Tuncdemir.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Tuncdemir, A.R., Yıldırım, C., Güller, F. et al. The effect of post surface treatments on the bond strength of fiber posts to root surfaces. Lasers Med Sci 28, 13–18 (2013). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10103-012-1053-z

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10103-012-1053-z

Keywords

Navigation