Skip to main content

Advertisement

SpringerLink
Log in

Ethanol from Indian agro-industrial lignocellulosic biomass: an emergy evaluation

  • Original Paper
  • Published:
Clean Technologies and Environmental Policy Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

This study assesses the environmental performance of biomass feedstocks, rice husk, wheat stalk, cotton stalk, sorghum stalk, and sugarcane bagasse, for ethanol production in India. The analysis calculates emergy indicators and demonstrates the dilemma in selection of biomass feedstocks for meeting the ethanol blending target decided by the biofuel policy of the Government of India. It considers spatial variability, and computes the production potential of each lignocellulosic feedstock considered in the study. Achieving high return on energy invested, high renewability, and large production rates simultaneously seems difficult for the considered feedstocks. Among these cellulosic feedstocks, rice husk shows highest renewability and ethanol production potential. Although sorghum stalk has a high return on investment, it has lowest renewability among the feedstocks considered in the study. Rice husk and cotton stalk should be targeted first to fulfil the blending demand of gasoline as they show highest renewability and quality corrected emergy return on investment, along with a high production potential. Emergy analysis of cellulosic biofuels can provide a holistic platform for decision makers for designing the biofuel policy and selection of feedstock in the Indian context.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Agoramoorthy G, Hsu MJ, Chaudhary S, Shieh PC (2009) Can biofuel crops alleviate tribal poverty in India’s drylands? Appl Energy 86:S118–S124

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Baral A, Bakshi BR, Smith RL (2012) Assessing resource intensity and renewability of cellulosic ethanol technologies using eco-LCA. Environ Sci Technol 46(4):2436–2444

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Bastianoni S, Marchettini N (1996) Ethanol production from biomass: analysis of process efficiency and sustainability. Biomass Bioenergy 11(5):411–418

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Brown MT, Buranakarn V (2003) Emergy indices and ratios for sustainable material cycles and recycle options. Resour Conserv Recycl 38(1):1–22

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Brown MT, Ulgiati S (1997) Emergy-based indices and ratios to evaluate sustainability: monitoring economies and technology toward environmentally sound innovation. Ecol Eng 9:51–69

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cao K, Feng X (2007) Distribution of emergy indices and its application. Energy Fuels 21:1717–1723

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Chavez-Rodriguez MF, Nebra NA (2010) Assessing GHG emissions, ecological footprint, and water linkage for different fuels. Environ Sci Technol 44:9252–9257

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Coppola F, Bastianoni S, Ostergard H (2009) Sustainability of bioethanol production from wheat with recycled residues as evaluated by Emergy assessment. Biomass Bioenergy 33:1626–1642

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Dong X, Ulgiati S, Yan M, Zhang X, Gao W (2008) Energy and eMergy evaluation of bioethanol production from wheat in Henan Province, China. Energy Policy 36:3882–3892

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Felix ER (2006) Integrated energy, environmental and financial analysis of biofuel production from switchgrass, hybrid poplar, soybean and casterbean. M.S. University of Maryland, College Park

    Google Scholar 

  • Felix E, Tilley DR (2009) Integrated energy, environmental and financial analysis of ethanol production from cellulosic switchgrass. Energy 34:410–436

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Goh CS, Lee KT (2010) Palm-based biofuel refinery (PBR) to substitute petroleum refinery: an energy and emergy assessment. Renew Sustain Energy Rev 14(9):2986–2995

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Hau JL, Bakshi BR (2004) Promise and problems of emergy analysis. Ecol Model 178:215–225

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Jia C, Zhang J, Zhai Y, Li T (2010) Emergy analysis of cassava -based fuel ethanol in china in 2010. In: 2nd Conference on environmental science and information application technology, pp 486–488

  • Liao W, Heijungs R, Huppes G (2011) Is bioethanol a sustainable energy source? An energy-, exergy-, and emergy-based thermodynamic system analysis. Renew Energy 36(12):3479–3487

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Liu J, Lin B, Sagisaka M (2012) Sustainability assessment of bioethanol and petroleum fuel production in Japan based on emergy analysis. Energy Policy 44:23–33

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lu H, Lin B, Campbell DE, Sagisaka M, Ren H (2012) Biofuel vs. biodiversity? Integrated emergy and economic cost-benefit evaluation of rice-ethanol production in Japan. Energy 46(1):442–450

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mandade P, Bakshi BR, Yadav GD (2015) Ethanol from Indian agro-industrial lignocellulosic biomass—a life cycle evaluation of energy, greenhouse gases, land and water. Int J Life Cycle Assess 20(12):1649–1658

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Martin JF, Diemont SAW, Powell E, Stanton M, Levytacher S (2006) Emergy evaluation of the performance and sustainability of three agricultural systems with different scales and management. Agric Ecosyst Environ 115:128–140

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • National Policy on Biofuels (2009) Govt. of India, Ministry of New and Renewable Energy, pp 1–18

  • Odum, HT (1996) Environmental accounting: emergy and environmental decision making. Wiley, New York, 370 pp

    Google Scholar 

  • Ometto AR, Ramos PAR, Lombardi G (2007) The benefits of a Brazilian agro- industrial symbiosis system and the strategies to make it happen. J Clean Prod 15:1253–1258

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Pereira CLF, Ortega E (2010) Sustainability assessment of large-scale ethanol production from sugarcane. J Clean Prod 18(1):77–82

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Pizzigallo ACI, Granai C, Borsa S (2008) The joint use of LCA and emergy evaluation for the analysis of two Italian wine farms. J Environ Manag 86:397–406

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rugani B, Panasiuk D, Benetto E (2012) An input-output based framework to evaluate human labor in life cycle assessment. Int J Life Cycle Assess 17:795–812

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sukumaran RK, Surender VJ, Sindhu R, Binod P, Janu KU, Sajna KV, Rajasree KP, Pandey A (2010) Lignocellulosic ethanol in India: prospects, challenges and feedstock availability. Bioresour Technol 101(13):4826–4833

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Ukidwe NU, Bakshi BR (2005) Flow of natural versus economic capital in industrial supply networks and its implications to sustainability. Environ Sci Technol 39(24):9759–9769

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Ulgiati S, Brown MT (1998) Monitoring patterns of sustainability in natural and man-made ecosystems. Ecol Model 108:23–36

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Yang H, Chen L, Yan Z, Wang H (2010) Emergy analysis of cassava-based fuel ethanol in China. Biomass Bioenergy 1:581–589

    Google Scholar 

  • Zhou SY, Zhang B, Cai ZF (2010) Emergy analysis of a farm biogas project in China: a biophysical perspective of agricultural ecological engineering. Commun Nonlinear Sci Numer Simulat 15(5):1408–1418

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgments

Partial funding for this work was provided by the University Grants Commission, Government of India.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Department of Chemical Engineering, Institute of Chemical Technology, Matunga, Mumbai, 400 019, India

    Prasad Mandade & G. D. Yadav

  2. Lowrie Department of Chemical and Biomolecular Engineering, The Ohio State University, Columbus, OH, 43210, USA

    Bhavik R. Bakshi

Authors
  1. Prasad Mandade
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Bhavik R. Bakshi
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. G. D. Yadav
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Bhavik R. Bakshi.

Electronic supplementary material

Below is the link to the electronic supplementary material.

Supplementary material 1 (DOCX 187 kb)

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Mandade, P., Bakshi, B.R. & Yadav, G.D. Ethanol from Indian agro-industrial lignocellulosic biomass: an emergy evaluation. Clean Techn Environ Policy 18, 2625–2634 (2016). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10098-016-1179-y

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10098-016-1179-y

Keywords

Search

Navigation