Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

Economic and environmental optimization of the biobutanol purification process

  • Original Paper
  • Published:
Clean Technologies and Environmental Policy Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Current technologies for the production of biobutanol by fermentation have improved the production processes. These new technology improvements are economically viable with respect to the petrochemical pathway. For this, the aim of this paper is to compare four different process designs for the purification of biobutanol by solving a multi-objective optimization process involving two objective functions: the total annual cost and return of investment as economic functions and the associated eco-indicator 99 as an environmental function. The process associated to the routes A, B, and C consists of a steam stripping distillation and distillation columns, while the process D includes distillation columns with a liquid–liquid extraction column. Process modeling was performed in the Aspen Plus software, and the multi-objective optimization was conducted using differential evolution with tabu list as a stochastic optimization method. Results indicate that the process route D is the most profitable design and the process route C has the lowest environmental impact measured through the eco-indicator 99 method. Additionally, the use of a solar collector against steam has been compared in order to produce the required heat duty needed in every single distillation column to have a broader view about the environmental and economic impact of these devices.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5
Fig. 6
Fig. 7
Fig. 8
Fig. 9
Fig. 10
Fig. 11
Fig. 12

Similar content being viewed by others

Abbreviations

ABE:

Acetone–butanol–ethanol

C TM :

Capital cost of the plant

C ut :

Utility costs

DDE:

Dynamic data exchange

DE:

Differential evolution

DETL:

Differential evolution with tabu list

D cn :

Column diameter

ETSC:

Evacuated tube solar collector

F rn :

Distillate fluxes

GAs:

Genetic algorithms

LLE:

Liquid–liquid extraction

LCA:

Life-cycle assessment

N tn :

Total column stages

N fn :

Feed stages

ROI:

Return of investment

RFS:

Renewable fuel standard program

R rn :

Reflux ratio

TAC:

Total annual cost

TL:

Tabu list

\( {x}_{\text{m}} \) :

Vectors of required purities

\( {y}_{\text{m}} \) :

Vectors of obtained purities

References

  • Alexander B, Barton G, Petrie J, Romagnoli J (2000) Process synthesis and optimization tools for environmental design: methodology and structure. Comput Chem Eng 24:1195–1200

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Al-Shorgani NKN, Kalil MS, Ali E, Hamid AA, Yusoff WMW (2012) The use of pretreated palm oil mill effluent for acetone–butanol–ethanol fermentation by Clostridium sccharoperbutylacetonicum N1-4. Clean Technol Environ Policy 14(5):879–887

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Bagajewicz M (2008) On the use of net present value in investment capacity planning models. Ind Eng Chem Res 47(23):9413–9416

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Brekke K (2007) Butanol: an energy alternative? Ethanol Today 36–92

  • Bulatov I, Klemes J (2009) Towards cleaner technologies: emissions reduction, energy and waste minimisation, industrial implementation. Clean Technol Environ Policy 11:1–6

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Chapeaux A, Simoni LD, Ronan TS, Stadtherr MA, Brennecke JF (2008) Extraction of alcohols from water with 1-hexyl-3-methylimidazolium bis(trifluoromethylsulfonyl)imide. Green Chem 10(12):1301–1306

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Chouinard-Dussault P, Laura Bradt, Ponce-Ortega JM, El-Halwagi MM (2011) Incorporation of process integration into lie cycle analysis for the production of biofuels. Clean Technol Environ Policy 13(5):673–685

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Delgado-Delgado R, Hernáncez S, Barroso-Muños F, Segovia-Hernández JG, Rico-Ramirez V (2015) Some operational aspects and applications of dividing wall columns: energy requirements and carbon dioxide emissions. Clean Technol Environ Policy. doi:10.1007/s10098-014-0822-8

    Google Scholar 

  • Emtir M, Etoumi A (2008) Enhancement of conventional distillation configurations or ternary mixtures separation. Clean Technol Environ Policy 11(1):123–131

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Ezeji T, Qureshi N, Blaschek H (2004) Butanol fermentation research: upstream and downstream manipulations. Chem Rec 4(5):305–314

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Ezeji T, Qureshi N, Blaschek H (2007) Bioproduction of butanol from biomass: from genes to bioreactors. Curr Opin Biotechnol 18:220–227

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • García V, Päkkilä J, Ojamo H, Muurinen E, Keiski RL (2011) Challenges in biobutanol production: how to improve the efficiency? Renew Sustain Energy Rev 15:964–980

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Gebreslassie BH, Guillen-Gosalbez G, Jiménez L, Boer D (2009) Design of environmentally conscious absorption cooling systems via multiobjective optimization and life cycle assessment. Appl Energy 86:1712–1722

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Geodkoop M, Spriensma R (2001) The eco-indicator 99. A damage oriented for life cycle impact assessment. Methodology report and manual for designers. Technical report, PRé Consultants, Amersfoort, The Netherlands

  • Guillén-Gosálbez G, Caballero JA, Jiménez L (2008) Application of life cycle assessment to the structural optimization of process flowsheets. Ind Eng Chem Res 47:777–789

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Gupta S, Sarkar P, Singla E (2015) Understanding different stakeholders of sustainable product and service-based systems using genetic algorithm. Clean Technol Environ Policy. doi:10.1007/s10098-014-0880-y

    Google Scholar 

  • Guthrie KM (1969) Capital cost estimating. Chem Eng 76(6):14–142

    Google Scholar 

  • Gutierrez-Arriaga CG, Serna-González M, Ponce-Ortega JM, El-Halwagi MM (2013) Multi-objective optimization of steam power plants for sustainable generation of electricity. Clean Technol Environ Policy 15(4):551–566

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lira-Barragan L, Ponce-Ortega JM, Serna-González M, El-Halwagi MM (2013) Synthesis of integrated adsorption refrigeration systems involving economic and environmental objectives and quantifying social benefits. Appl Therm Eng 52:402–419

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Marlatt J, Datta R (1986) Acetone–biobutanol fermentation process development and economic evaluation. Biotechnol Prog 2:23–28

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Ponce-Ortega JM, Al-Thubaiti MM, El-Halwagi MM (2012) Process intensification: new understanding and systematic approach. Chem Eng Process 53:63–75

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Roffler S, Blanch H, Wilke C (1987) Extractive fermentation of acetone and biobutanol: process design and economic evaluation. Biotechnol Prog 3:131–140

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Sánchez-Bautista AF, Santibañez-Aguilar JE, Ponce-Ortega JM, Nápoles-Rivera F, Serna-González M, El-Halwagi MM (2015) Optimal design of domestic water-heating solar systems. Clean Technol Environ Policy. doi:10.1007/s10098-014-0818-4

    Google Scholar 

  • Sánchez-Ramírez E, Quiroz-Ramírez JJ, Segovia-Hernández JG, Hernández S, Bonilla-Petriciolet A (2015) Process alternatives for biobutanol purification: design and optimization. Ind Eng Chem Res 54:351–358

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Srinivas M, Rangaiah GP (2007) Differential evolution with TL for solving nonlinear and mixed-integer nonlinear programming problems. Ind Eng Chem Res 46:7126–7135

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Turton R, Bailie RC, Whiting WB, Shaeiwitz JA (2009) Analysis, synthesis and design of chemical process, 3rd edn. Prentice Hall, Englewood Cliffs

    Google Scholar 

  • Ulrich GD (1984) A guide to chemical engineering process design and economics. Wiley, New York

    Google Scholar 

  • Van der Merwe AB, Cheng H, Görgens JF, Knoetze JH (2013) Comparison of energy efficiency and economics of process designs for biobutanol production from sugarcane molasses. Fuel 105:451–458

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Wenzel H (2009) Biofuels: the good, the bad, the ugly—and the unwise policy. Clean Technol Environ Policy 11:143–145

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Departamento de Ingeniería Química, Universidad de Guanajuato, Campus Guanajuato, Noria Alta s/n, 36050, Guanajuato, GTO, Mexico

    Eduardo Sánchez-Ramírez, Juan José Quiroz-Ramírez, Juan Gabriel Segovia-Hernández & Salvador Hernández

  2. Facultad de Ingeniería Química, Universidad Michoacana de San Nicolás de Hidalgo, 58060, Morelia, MICH, Mexico

    José María Ponce-Ortega

Authors
  1. Eduardo Sánchez-Ramírez
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Juan José Quiroz-Ramírez
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. Juan Gabriel Segovia-Hernández
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  4. Salvador Hernández
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  5. José María Ponce-Ortega
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Juan Gabriel Segovia-Hernández.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Sánchez-Ramírez, E., Quiroz-Ramírez, J.J., Segovia-Hernández, J.G. et al. Economic and environmental optimization of the biobutanol purification process. Clean Techn Environ Policy 18, 395–411 (2016). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10098-015-1024-8

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10098-015-1024-8

Keywords

Search

Navigation