Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Antimicrobial susceptibility of rapidly growing mycobacteria using the rapid colorimetric method

  • Article
  • Published:
European Journal of Clinical Microbiology & Infectious Diseases Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Drug susceptibility testing (DST) of rapidly growing mycobacteria (RGM) are recommended for guiding the antimicrobial therapy. We have evaluated the use of resazurin in Mueller–Hinton medium (MHR) for MIC determination of RGM and compared the results with those obtained with the reference standard broth microdilution in Mueller–Hinton (MH) and with the resazurin microtiter assay (REMA) in 7H9 broth. The MIC of eight drugs: amikacin (AMI), cefoxitin (FOX), ciprofloxacin (CIP), clarithromycin (CLA), doxycycline (DOX), linezolid (LZD), moxifloxacin (MXF) and trimethoprim-sulfamethoxazole (TMP-SMX) were evaluated against 76 RGM (18 species) using three methods (MH, MHR, and REMA) in a 96-well plate format incubated at 37 °C over 3–5 days. Results obtained in the MH plates were interpreted by the appearance of turbidity at the bottom of the well before adding the resazurin. MHR and 7H9-REMA plates were read by visual observation for a change in color from blue to pink. The majority of results were obtained at day 5 for MH and 1 day after for MHR and 7H9-REMA. However, the preliminary experiment on time to positivity results using the reference strain showed that the resazurin can be added to the MH at day 2 to produce the results at day 3, but future studies with large sets of strains are required to confirm this suggestion. A high level of agreement (kappa 1.000–0.884) was obtained between the MH and the MHR. Comparison of results obtained with 7H9-REMA, on the other hand, revealed several discrepancies and a lower level of agreement (kappa 1.000–0.111). The majority of the strains were resistant to DOX and TMP-SMX, and the most active antimicrobials for RGM were AMI and FOX. In the present study, MHR represented an excellent alternative for MIC determination of RGM. The results could be read reliably, more easily, and more quickly than with the classical MH method.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Falkinham JO III (2009) Surrounded by mycobacteria: nontuberculous mycobacteria in the human environment. J Appl Microbiol 107:356–367

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. Set R, Shastri J (2011) Laboratory aspects of clinically significant rapidly growing mycobacteria. Indian J Med Microbiol 29:343–352

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. Yu JR, Heo ST, Lee KH, Kim J, Sung JK, Kim YR, Kim JW (2013) Skin and soft tissue infection due to rapidly growing mycobacteria: case series and literature review. Infect Chemother 45:85–93

    Article  PubMed Central  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. El Helou G, Viola GM, Hachem R, Han XY, Raad II (2013) Rapidly growing mycobacterial bloodstream infections. Lancet Infect Dis 13:166–174

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Yano Y, Kitada S, Mori M, Kagami S, Taguri T, Uenami T, Namba Y, Yoneda T, Yokota S, Maekura R (2013) Pulmonary disease caused by rapidly growing mycobacteria: a retrospective study of 44 cases in Japan. Respiration 85:305–311

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Hsiao CH, Tsai TF, Hsueh PR (2011) Characteristics of skin and soft tissue infection caused by non-tuberculous mycobacteria in Taiwan. Int J Tuberc Lung Dis 15:811–817

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Brown-Elliott BA, Nash KA, Wallace RJ Jr (2012) Antimicrobial susceptibility testing, drug resistance mechanisms, and therapy of infections with nontuberculous mycobacteria. Clin Microbiol Rev 25:545–582

    Article  CAS  PubMed Central  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. Van Ingen J, Boeree MJ, van Soolingen D, Mouton JW (2012) Resistance mechanisms and drug susceptibility testing of nontuberculous mycobacteria. Drug Resist Updat 15:149–161

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Cardoso AM, Junqueira-Kipnis AP, Kipnis A (2011) In vitro antimicrobial susceptibility of Mycobacterium massiliense recovered from wound samples of patients submitted to arthroscopic and laparoscopic surgeries. Minim Invasive Surg 2011:724635

    PubMed Central  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. Clinical and Laboratory Standards Institute (2011) Susceptibility testing of mycobacteria, nocardiae, and other aerobic actinomycetes; approved standard, 2nd edn. CLSI document M24-A2

  11. Palomino JC, Martin A, Camacho M, Guerra H, Swings J, Portaels F (2002) Resazurin microtiter assay plate: simple and inexpensive method for detection of drug resistance in Mycobacterium tuberculosis. Antimicrob Agents Chemother 46:2720–2722

    Article  CAS  PubMed Central  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. Martin A, Camacho M, Portaels F, Palomino JC (2003) Resazurin microtiter assay plate testing of Mycobacterium tuberculosis susceptibilities to second-line drugs: rapid, simple, and inexpensive method. Antimicrob Agents Chemother 47:3616–3619

    Article  CAS  PubMed Central  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. Broda A, Jebbari H, Beaton K, Mitchell S, Drobniewski F (2013) Comparative drug resistance of Mycobacterium abscessus and M. chelonae isolates from patients with and without cystic fibrosis in the United Kingdom. J Clin Microbiol 51:217–223

    Article  CAS  PubMed Central  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  14. Collins LA, Franzblau SG (1997) Microplate alamar blue verses BACTEC 460 system for high-throughput screening of compounds against Mycobacterium tuberculosis and Mycobacterium avium. Antimicrob Agents Chemother 41:1004–1009

    CAS  PubMed Central  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  15. Vanitha JD, Paramasivan CN (2004) Evaluation of microplate Alamar blue assay for drug susceptibility testing of Mycobacterium avium complex isolates. Diagn Microbiol Infect Dis 49:179–182

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  16. Li G, Lian L, Wan L, Zhang J, Zhao X, Jiang Y, Zhao L, Liu H, Wan K (2013) Antimicrobial susceptibility of standard strains of nontuberculous mycobacteria by microplate alamar blue assay. PLoS One 88:e84065

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. Jadaun GP, Agarwal C, Sharma H, Ahmed Z, Upadhyay P, Faujdar J, Gupta AK, Das R, Gupta P, Chauhan DS, Sharma VD, Katoch VM (2007) Determination of ethambutol MICs for Mycobacterium tuberculosis and Mycobacterium avium isolates by resazurin microtitre assay. J Antimicrob Chemother 60:152–155

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  18. Cavusoglu C, Gurpinar T, Ecemis T (2012) Evaluation of antimicrobial susceptibilities of rapidly growing mycobacteria by Sensititre RAPMYCO panel. New Microbiol 35:73–76

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  19. Wallace RJ Jr, Brown-Elliott BA, Crist CJ, Mann L, Wilson RW (2002) Comparison of the in vitro activity of the glycylcycline tigecycline (formerly GAR-936) with those of tetracycline, minocycline, and doxycycline against isolates of nontuberculous mycobacteria. Antimicrob Agents Chemother 46:3164–3167

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  20. Huang YC, Liu MF, Shen GH, Lin CF, Kao CC, Liu PY, Shi ZY (2010) Clinical outcome of Mycobacterium abscessus infection and antimicrobial susceptibility testing. J Microbiol Immunol Infect 43:401–406

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  21. Reddy AK, Garg P, Babu KH, Gopinathan U, Sharma S (2010) In vitro antibiotic susceptibility of rapidly growing nontuberculous mycobacteria isolated from patients with microbial keratitis. Curr Eye Res 35:225–229

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  22. Gayathri R, Therese KL, Deepa P, Mangai S, Madhavan HN (2010) Antibiotic susceptibility pattern of rapidly growing mycobacteria. J Postgrad Med 56:76–78

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  23. Gitti Z, Mantadakis E, Maraki S, Samonis G (2011) Clinical significance and antibiotic susceptibilities of nontuberculous mycobacteria from patients in Crete, Greece. Future Microbiol 6:1099–1109

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

We thank Dr. Edward Moore for kindly providing us with CCUG type and reference strains. We acknowledge the “Coordenação de Aperfeiçoamento de Pessoal de Nível Superior” (CAPES, Brazil) for the financial support to Ivy Bastos Ramis (PDSE-7675/13-5).

Conflict of interest

The authors declare that they have no conflicts of interest.

Compliance with ethical standards

We confirm that no human participants or animals were included in this study. Consequently, no informed consent was needed.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to I. B. Ramis.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Ramis, I.B., Cnockaert, M., von Groll, A. et al. Antimicrobial susceptibility of rapidly growing mycobacteria using the rapid colorimetric method. Eur J Clin Microbiol Infect Dis 34, 1403–1413 (2015). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10096-015-2365-2

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10096-015-2365-2

Keywords

Navigation