Skip to main content
Log in

Relative incidence of phlebitis associated with peripheral intravenous catheters in the lower versus upper extremities

  • Article
  • Published:
European Journal of Clinical Microbiology & Infectious Diseases Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Peripheral venous access in elderly, hospitalized patients is often challenging. The usual alternative is insertion of a central venous catheter, with associated risk for complications. The purpose of this investigation was to determine the relative incidence of phlebitis secondary to lower as compared to upper extremity intravenous catheters (IVCs) and associated risk factors. A non-randomized, observational, cohort-controlled study was carried out. Consecutive patients receiving a lower extremity IVC were enrolled and compared with patients receiving an upper extremity IVC. Patients were followed from insertion until removal of the IVC. The major endpoint was phlebitis. The incidence of phlebitis secondary to upper extremity IVCs was 3/50 (6 %) compared to 5/53 (9.4 %) in lower extremity IVCs (χ2 Yates = 0.08, p = 0.776). Age, gender, obesity, diabetes mellitus, site (arm versus leg, left versus right), and size of needle were not found to be risk factors for phlebitis according to univariate analysis. None of the patients developed bloodstream infection. In elderly patients with poor venous access, lower extremity IVCs are a reasonable and low-risk alternative to central venous catheters.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Wallis MC, McGrail M, Webster J, Marsh N, Gowardman J, Playford EG, Rickard CM (2014) Risk factors for peripheral intravenous catheter failure: a multivariate analysis of data from a randomized controlled trial. Infect Control Hosp Epidemiol 35(1):63–68

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. Lorente L, Henry C, Martín MM, Jiménez A, Mora ML (2005) Central venous catheter-related infection in a prospective and observational study of 2,595 catheters. Crit Care 9:R631–R635

    Article  PubMed Central  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. Hamilton HC, Foxcroft DR (2007) Central venous access sites for the prevention of venous thrombosis, stenosis and infection in patients requiring long-term intravenous therapy. Cochrane Database Syst Rev (3):CD004084

  4. Khanna V, Mukhopadhayay C, Vandana KE, Verma M, Dabke P (2013) Evaluation of central venous catheter associated blood stream infections: a microbiological observational study. J Pathog 2013:936864

  5. Lee WL, Liao SF, Lee WC, Huang CH, Fang CT (2010) Soft tissue infections related to peripheral intravenous catheters in hospitalised patients: a case–control study. J Hosp Infect 76:124–129

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Nassaji-Zavareh M, Ghorbani R (2007) Peripheral intravenous catheter-related phlebitis and related risk factors. Singapore Med J 48:733–736

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Salgueiro-Oliveira A, Parreira P, Veiga P (2012) Incidence of phlebitis in patients with peripheral intravenous catheters: the influence of some risk factors. Aust J Adv Nurs 30:32–39

    Google Scholar 

  8. Horan TC, Andrus M, Dudeck MA (2008) CDC/NHSN surveillance definition of health care-associated infection and criteria for specific types of infections in the acute care setting. Am J Infect Control 36:309–332

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Malach T, Jerassy Z, Rudensky B, Schlesinger Y, Broide E, Olsha O, Yinnon AM, Raveh D (2006) Prospective surveillance of phlebitis associated with peripheral intravenous catheters. Am J Infect Control 34:308–312

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. Rickard CM, Webster J, Wallis MC, Marsh N, McGrail MR, French V, Foster L, Gallagher P, Gowardman JR, Zhang L, McClymont A, Whitby M (2012) Routine versus clinically indicated replacement of peripheral intravenous catheters: a randomised controlled equivalence trial. Lancet 380:1066–1074

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. Webster J, Osborne S, Rickard CM, New K (2013) Clinically-indicated replacement versus routine replacement of peripheral venous catheters. Cochrane Database Syst Rev 4:CD007798

  12. Ho KH, Cheung DS (2012) Guidelines on timing in replacing peripheral intravenous catheters. J Clin Nurs 21:1499–1506

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. Ascoli GB, DeGuzman PB, Rowlands A (2012) Peripheral intravenous catheter complication rates between those indwelling > 96 hours to those indwelling 72–96 hours: a retrospective correlational study. Int J Nurs 1:7–12

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Conflict of interest

The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to A. M. Yinnon.

Additional information

Yuval Schwartz is an equal first contributor.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Benaya, A., Schwartz, Y., Kory, R. et al. Relative incidence of phlebitis associated with peripheral intravenous catheters in the lower versus upper extremities. Eur J Clin Microbiol Infect Dis 34, 913–916 (2015). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10096-014-2304-7

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10096-014-2304-7

Keywords

Navigation