Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Correlated patterns of neuropsychological and behavioral symptoms in frontal variant of Alzheimer disease and behavioral variant frontotemporal dementia: a comparative case study

  • Quiz Cases
  • Published:
Neurological Sciences Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Although the neuropathologic changes and diagnostic criteria for the neurodegenerative disorder Alzheimer’s disease (AD) are well-established, the clinical symptoms vary largely. Symptomatically, frontal variant of AD (fv-AD) presents very similarly to behavioral variant frontotemporal dementia (bvFTD), which creates major challenges for differential diagnosis. Here, we report two patients who present with progressive cognitive impairment, early and prominent behavioral features, and significant frontotemporal lobe atrophy on magnetic resonance imaging, consistent with an initial diagnosis of probable bvFTD. However, multimodal functional neuroimaging revealed neuropathological data consistent with a diagnosis of probable AD for one patient (pathology distributed in the frontal lobes) and a diagnosis of probable bvFTD for the other patient (hypometabolism in the bilateral frontal lobes). In addition, the fv-AD patient presented with greater executive impairment and milder behavioral symptoms relative to the bvFTD patient. These cases highlight that recognition of these atypical syndromes using detailed neuropsychological tests, biomarkers, and multimodal neuroimaging will lead to greater accuracy in diagnosis and patient management.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4

References

  1. Dubois B, Feldman HH, Jacova C, Hampel H, Molinuevo JL, Blennow K, DeKosky ST, Gauthier S, Selkoe D, Bateman R, Cappa S, Crutch S, Engelborghs S, Frisoni GB, Fox NC, Galasko D, Habert MO, Jicha GA, Nordberg A, Pasquier F, Rabinovici G, Robert P, Rowe C, Salloway S, Sarazin M, Epelbaum S, de Souza LC, Vellas B, Visser PJ, Schneider L, Stern Y, Scheltens P, Cummings JL (2014) Advancing research diagnostic criteria for Alzheimer’s disease: the IWG-2 criteria. Lancet Neurol 13:614–629

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. Warren JD, Fletcher PD, Golden HL (2012) The paradox of syndromic diversity in Alzheimer disease. Nat Rev Neurol 8:451–464

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. Blennerhassett R, Lillo P, Halliday GM, Hodges JR, Kril JJ (2014) Distribution of pathology in frontal variant Alzheimer’s disease. J Alzheimers Dis 39:63–70

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Duker AP, Espay AJ, Wszolek ZK, Rademakers R, Dickson DW, Kelley BJ (2012) Atypical motor and behavioral presentations of Alzheimer disease: a case-based approach. Neurologist 18:266–272

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Johnson JK, Head E, Kim R, Starr A, Cotman CW (1999) Clinical and pathological evidence for a frontal variant of Alzheimer disease. Arch Neurol 56:1233–1239

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Yeung PY, Wong LL, Chan CC, Leung JL, Yung CY (2014) A validation study of the Hong Kong version of Montreal Cognitive Assessment (HK-MoCA) in Chinese older adults in Hong Kong. Hong Kong Med J. doi:10.12809/hkmj144219

    PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  7. Hu JB, Zhou WH, Hu SH, Huang ML, Wei N, Qi HL, Huang JW, Xu Y (2013) Cross-cultural difference and validation of the Chinese version of Montreal Cognitive Assessment in older adults residing in Eastern China: preliminary findings. Arch Gerontol Geriatr 56:38–43

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. Molloy DW, Standish TI (1997) A guide to the standardized Mini-Mental State Examination. Int Psychogeriatr 9(Suppl 1):87–94 discussion 143–150

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Wang T, Xiao S, Li X, Wang H, Liu Y, Su N, Fang Y (2012) Reliability and validity of the Chinese version of the neuropsychiatric inventory in mainland China. Int J Geriatr Psychiatry 27:539–544

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. Konstantinopoulou E, Aretouli E, Ioannidis P, Karacostas D, Kosmidis MH (2013) Behavioral disturbances differentiate frontotemporal lobar degeneration subtypes and Alzheimer’s disease: evidence from the Frontal Behavioral Inventory. Int J Geriatr Psychiatry 28:939–946

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. Slachevsky A, Villalpando JM, Sarazin M, Hahn-Barma V, Pillon B, Dubois B (2004) Frontal assessment battery and differential diagnosis of frontotemporal dementia and Alzheimer disease. Arch Neurol 61:1104–1107

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. Khan A, Yavorsky C, DiClemente G, Opler M, Liechti S, Rothman B, Jovic S (2013) Reliability of the Alzheimer’s disease assessment scale (ADAS-Cog) in longitudinal studies. Curr Alzheimer Res 10:952–963

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. Karrasch M, Myllyniemi A, Latvasalo L, Soderholm C, Ellfolk U, Laine M (2010) The diagnostic accuracy of an incidental memory modification of the Boston Naming Test (memo-BNT) in differentiating between normal aging and mild Alzheimer’s disease. Clin Neuropsychol 24:1355–1364

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  14. Iijima S (2011) Disability Assessment for Dementia (DAD), Alzheimer’s Disease Cooperative Study-Activities of Daily Living (ADCS-ADL). Nihon Rinsho 69(Suppl 8):471–474

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  15. Faries D, Herrera J, Rayamajhi J, DeBrota D, Demitrack M, Potter WZ (2000) The responsiveness of the Hamilton Depression Rating Scale. J Psychiatr Res 34:3–10

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  16. Tollefson GD, Holman SL (1993) Analysis of the Hamilton Depression Rating Scale factors from a double-blind, placebo-controlled trial of fluoxetine in geriatric major depression. Int Clin Psychopharmacol 8:253–259

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  17. Rascovsky K, Hodges JR, Knopman D, Mendez MF, Kramer JH, Neuhaus J, van Swieten JC, Seelaar H, Dopper EG, Onyike CU, Hillis AE, Josephs KA, Boeve BF, Kertesz A, Seeley WW, Rankin KP, Johnson JK, Gorno-Tempini ML, Rosen H, Prioleau-Latham CE, Lee A, Kipps CM, Lillo P, Piguet O, Rohrer JD, Rossor MN, Warren JD, Fox NC, Galasko D, Salmon DP, Black SE, Mesulam M, Weintraub S, Dickerson BC, Diehl-Schmid J, Pasquier F, Deramecourt V, Lebert F, Pijnenburg Y, Chow TW, Manes F, Grafman J, Cappa SF, Freedman M, Grossman M, Miller BL (2011) Sensitivity of revised diagnostic criteria for the behavioural variant of frontotemporal dementia. Brain 134:2456–2477

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  18. Barnes J, Fox NC (2014) The search for early markers of AD: hippocampal atrophy and memory deficits. Int Psychogeriatr 26:1065–1066

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  19. Barnes J, Whitwell JL, Frost C, Josephs KA, Rossor M, Fox NC (2006) Measurements of the amygdala and hippocampus in pathologically confirmed Alzheimer disease and frontotemporal lobar degeneration. Arch Neurol 63:1434–1439

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  20. Wolk DA (2013) Amyloid imaging in atypical presentations of Alzheimer’s disease. Curr Neurol Neurosci Rep 13:412

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  21. Dubois B, Feldman HH, Jacova C, Dekosky ST, Barberger-Gateau P, Cummings J, Delacourte A, Galasko D, Gauthier S, Jicha G, Meguro K, O’Brien J, Pasquier F, Robert P, Rossor M, Salloway S, Stern Y, Visser PJ, Scheltens P (2007) Research criteria for the diagnosis of Alzheimer’s disease: revising the NINCDS-ADRDA criteria. Lancet Neurol 8:734–746

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgments

The authors sincerely thank Hui-Hong Zhang for patient data collection and follow-up. This work was supported by grants from the Tianjin Health Bureau of Science and Technology Research Foundation (2013KG121), Tianjin Science and Technology Plan Foundation (2013ZCZDSY01600), the Special Fund of National Clinical and Medical Research (L2014071), and Youth Fund of the National Nature Science Foundation of China (81301629).

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Yu-Ying Zhou.

Ethics declarations

Conflict of interest

All of the authors read the final draft of the manuscript and declare no potential conflicts of interest with respect to the research, authorship, and/or publication of this article.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Li, P., Zhou, YY., Lu, D. et al. Correlated patterns of neuropsychological and behavioral symptoms in frontal variant of Alzheimer disease and behavioral variant frontotemporal dementia: a comparative case study. Neurol Sci 37, 797–803 (2016). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10072-015-2405-9

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10072-015-2405-9

Keywords

Navigation