Abstract
Honey bees (Apis mellifera) are prone to judge an ambiguous stimulus negatively if they had been agitated through shaking which simulates a predator attack. Such a cognitive bias has been suggested to reflect an internal emotional state analogous to humans who judge more pessimistically when they do not feel well. In order to test cognitive bias experimentally, an animal is conditioned to respond to two different stimuli, where one is punished while the other is rewarded. Subsequently a third, ambiguous stimulus is presented and it is measured whether the subject responds as if it expects a reward or a punishment. Generally, it is assumed that negative experiences lower future expectations, rendering the animals more pessimistic. Here we tested whether a most likely negatively experienced formic acid treatment against the parasitic mite Varroa destructor also affects future expectations of honey bees. We applied an olfactory learning paradigm (i.e., conditioned proboscis extension response) using two odorants and blends of these odorants as the ambiguous stimuli. Unlike agitating honey bees, exposure to formic acid did not significantly change the response to the ambiguous stimuli in comparison with untreated bees. Overall evidence suggests that the commonest treatment against one of the most harmful bee pests has no detrimental effects on cognitive bias in honey bees.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Anderson DL, Trueman JWH (2000) Varroa jacobsoni (Acari: Varroidae) is more than one species. Exp Appl Acarol 24:165–189
Armstrong T, Olatunji BO (2012) Eye tracking of attention in the affective disorders: a meta-analytic review and synthesis. Clin Psychol Rev 32:704–723
Bateson M, Desire S, Gartside SE, Wright GA (2011) Agitated honeybees exhibit pessimistic cognitive biases. Curr Biol 21(12):1070–1073
Bethell EJ (2015) A “how-to” guide for designing judgment bias studies to assess captive animal welfare. J Appl Anim Welf Sci 18:S18–S42
Bitterman ME, Menzel R, Fietz A, Schäfer S (1983) Classical conditioning of proboscis extension in honeybees (Apis mellifera). J Comp Psychol 97(2):107–119
Bolli HK, Bogdanov S, Imdorf A, Fluri P (1993) Zur Wirkungsweise von Ameisensäure bei Varroa jacobsoni Oud und der Honigbiene (Apis mellifera L). Apidologie 24(1):51–57
Boncristiani H, Underwood R, Schwarz R, Evans JD, Pettis J, vanEngelsdorp D (2012) Direct effect of acaricides on pathogen loads and gene expression levels in honey bees Apis mellifera. J Insect Physiol 58:613–620
Bos N, Roussel E, Giurfa M, d’Ettorre P (2014) Appetitive and aversive olfactory learning induce similar generalization rates in the honey bee. Anim Cogn 17(2):399–406
Calderone NW (2000) Effective fall treatment of Varroa jacobsoni (Acari: Varroidae) with a new formulation of formic acid in colonies of Apis mellifera (Hymenoptera: Apidae) in the northeastern United States. J Econ Entomol 93(4):1065–1075
Charrière JD, Imdorf A, Kilchenmann V (1992) Konzentrationen der Ameisensäure in der Stockluft von Bienenvölkern während der Anwendung gegen Varroa jacobsoni. ADIZ 26(9):12–16
Dukas R (2008) Mortality rates of honey bees in the wild. Insect Soc 55:252–255
Eysenck MW, Mogg K, May J, Richards A, Mathews A (1991) Bias in interpretation of ambiguous sentences related to threat in anxiety. J Abnorm Psychol 100:144–150
Genersch E, Evans JD, Fries I (2010) Honey bee disease overview. J Invertebr Pathol 103(Suppl 1):S2–S4
Giray T, Robinson GE (1994) Effects of intracolony variability in behavioral development on plasticity of division of labor in honey bee colonies. Behav Ecol Sociobiol 35(1):3–20
Giurfa M (2013) Cognition with few neurons: higher-order learning in insects. Trends Neurosci 36(5):285–294
Giurfa M, Sandoz J-C (2012) Invertebrate learning and memory: fifty years of olfactory conditioning of the proboscis extension response in honeybees. Learn Mem 19(2):54–66
Guerrieri F, Schubert M, Sandoz J-C, Giurfa M (2005) Perceptual and neural olfactory similarity in honeybees. PLoS Biol 3(4):e60
Gygax L (2014) The A to Z of statistics for testing cognitive judgement bias. Anim Behav 95:59–69
Harding EJ, Paul ES, Mendl M (2004) Animal behaviour: cognitive bias and affective state. Nature 427(6972):312
Horvath K, Angeletti D, Nascetti G, Carere C (2013) Invertebrate welfare: an overlooked issue. Ann Ist Super Sanita 49(1):9–17
Kloke V, Schreiber RS, Bodden C, Moellers J, Ruhmann H, Kaiser S, Lesch KP, Sacher N, Lewejohann L (2014) Hope for the best or prepare for the worst? Towards a spatial cognitive bias test for mice. PLoS One 9(8):e105431
Knudsen JT, Tollsten L, Bergström LG (1993) Floral scents—a checklist of volatile compounds isolated by head-space techniques. Phytochemistry 33(2):253–280
Leonard AS, Dornhaus A, Papaj DR (2011) Flowers help bees cope with uncertainty: signal detection and the function of floral complexity. J Exp Biol 214:113–121
MacLeod AK, Byrne A (1996) Anxiety, depression, and the anticipation of future positive and negative experiences. J Abnorm Psychol 105:286–289
Mason GJ (2011) Invertebrate welfare: where is the real evidence for conscious affective states? Trends Ecol Evol 26:212–213
Matt GE, Vázquez C, Campbell WK (1992) Mood-congruent recall of affectively toned stimuli: a meta-analytic review. Clin Psychol Rev 12:227–255
Mendl M, Burman OHP, Parker RMA, Paul ES (2009) Cognitive bias as an indicator of animal emotion and welfare: emerging evidence and underlying mechanisms. Appl Anim Behav Sci 118:161–181
Mendl M, Paul ES, Chittka L (2011) Animal behaviour: emotion in invertebrates? Curr Biol 21(12):R463–R465
Ostermann DJ, Currie RW (2004) Effect of formic acid formulations on honey bee (Hymenoptera: Apidae) colonies and influence of colony and ambient conditions on formic acid concentration in the hive. J Econ Entomol 97(5):1500–1508
R Core Team (2015) R: a language and environment for statistical computing. R Foundation for Statistical Computing, Vienna, Austria. https://www.R-project.org/
Rosenkranz P, Aumeier P, Ziegelmann B (2010) Biology and control of Varroa destructor. J Invertebr Pathol 103(Suppl 1):S96–S119
Satta A, Floris I, Eguaras M, Cabras P, Garau VL, Melis M (2005) Formic acid-based treatments for control of Varroa destructor in a Mediterranean area. J Econ Entomol 98(2):267–273
Scheiner R, Barnert M, Erber J (2003) Variation in water and sucrose responsiveness during the foraging season affects proboscis extension learning in honey bees. Apidologie 34(1):67–72
Scheiner R, Abramson CI, Brodschneider R, Crailsheim K, Farina WM, Fuchs S, Grünewald B, Hahshold S, Karrer M, Koeniger G, Koeniger N, Menzel R, Mujagic S, Radspieler G, Schmickl T, Schneider C, Siegel AJ, Szopek M, Thenius R (2013) Standard methods for behavioral studies of Apis mellifera. J Apic Res 52(4):1–58
Sherwin CM (2001) Can invertebrates suffer? Or, how robust is argument-by-analogy? Anim Welf 10:S103–S118
Smith BH, Abramson CI, Tobin TR (1991) Conditional withholding of proboscis extension in honeybees (Apis mellifera) during discriminative punishment. J Comp Psychol 105(4):345–356
Storer TI, Vansell GH (1935) Bee-eating proclivities of the striped skunk. J Mammal 16(2):118–121
Underwood RM, Currie RW (2003) The effects of temperature and dose of formic acid on treatment efficacy against Varroa destructor (Acari: Varroidae), a parasite of Apis mellifera (Hymenoptera: Apidae). Exp Appl Acarol 29:303–313
Williams JM, Mathews A, MacLeod C (1996) The emotional stroop task and psychopathology. Psychol Bull 120:3–24
Wright GA, Kottcamp SM, Thomson MGA (2008) Generalization mediates sensitivity to complex odor features in the Honeybee. PLoS One 3(2):e1704
Acknowledgments
We thank Ricarda Scheiner for advice on olfactory learning procedures in the honey bee and Ivana Moschella for laboratory assistance and preliminary experiments. The work was supported by the “Incentive Award of the Faculty of Biology/Chemistry” of the University of Osnabrueck to HS.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Ethics declarations
Conflict of interest
The authors declare that there is no conflict of interest with any of the funding agencies of the research reported herein.
Ethical statement
All applicable international, national, and/or institutional guidelines for the care and use of animals were followed.
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Schlüns, H., Welling, H., Federici, J.R. et al. The glass is not yet half empty: agitation but not Varroa treatment causes cognitive bias in honey bees. Anim Cogn 20, 233–241 (2017). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10071-016-1042-x
Received:
Revised:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10071-016-1042-x