Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

Mice use start point orientation to solve spatial problems in a water T-maze

  • Original Paper
  • Published:
Animal Cognition Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Behavioral work has demonstrated that rats solve many spatial problems using a conditional strategy based on orientation at the start point. The present study assessed whether mice use a similar strategy and whether the strategy would be affected by the poorer directional sensitivity of mice. In Experiment 1, mice were trained on a response, a direction or one of two place problems to locate a hidden platform in a water T-maze located in two positions. In the response task, mice made a right (or left) turn from two different start points located 180° apart. In the direction task, the maze was shifted (to the left or right) and the start points rotated by 180° across trials, but the platform was in a constant direction relative to room cues. In the translation place task, the mice were trained to locate the platform in a fixed location relative to extra-maze cues when the maze was shifted across trials, but the orientation of the start arm did not change. In the rotation place task, the mice were trained to locate the platform in a fixed location when the maze was shifted and the start points rotated by 90° across trials. As previously reported with rats, mice had difficulty solving the translation place problem compared with the other three problems. Unlike rats, mice learned the direction problem in significantly fewer trials than the rotation problem. This difference between acquisition of the direction and rotation problems was replicated in Experiment 2. The difficulty mice have in discriminating start point orientations that are 90° apart as opposed to 180° apart can be attributed to the broader firing ranges of HD cells in mice compared with rats.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Blodgett HC, McCutchen K, Mathews R (1949) Spatial learning in the t-maze: the influence of direction, turn, and food location. J Exp Psychol 39:800–809

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Brown RE, Wong AA (2007) The influence of visual ability on learning and memory performance in 13 strains of mice. Learn Mem 14:134–144

    Article  PubMed Central  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Cheung A, Sturzl W, Zeil J, Cheng K (2008) The information content of panoramic images II: view-based navigation in nonrectangular experimental arenas. J Exp Psychol Anim Behav Proc 34:15–30

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dudchenko PA, Zinyuk LE (2005) The formation of cognitive maps of adjacent environments: evidence from the head direction cell system. Behav Neurosci 119:1511–1523

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Dwyer JA, Ingram ML, Snow AC, Thorpe CT, Martin GM, Skinner DM (2013) The effects of bilateral lesions to the dorsal tegmental nucleus on spatial learning in rats. Behav Neurosci 127:867–877

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Frick KM, Stillner ET, Berger-Sweeney J (2000) Mice are not little rats: species differences in a one-day water maze task. NeuroReport 11:3461–3465

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Fyhn M, Molden S, Witter MP, Moser EI, Moser M (2004) Spatial representation in the entorhinal cortex. Science 305:1258–1264

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Fyhn M, Hafting T, Witter MP, Moser EI, Moser M (2008) Grid cells in mice. Hippo 18:1230–1238

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hafting T, Fyhn M, Molden S, Moser M, Moser EI (2005) Microstructure of a spatial map in the entorhinal cortex. Nature 436:801–806

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Hamilton DA, Akers KG, Weisend MP, Sutherland RJ (2007) How do room and apparatus cues control navigation in the Morris water task? Evidence for distinct contributions to a movement vector. J Exp Psychol Anim Behav Proc 33:100–114

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kentros CG, Agnihotri NT, Streater S, Hawkins RD, Kandel ER (2004) Increased attention to spatial context increases both place field stability and spatial memory. Neuron 42:283–295

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Knierim JJ, Hamilton DA (2011) Framing spatial cognition: neural representations of proximal and distal frames of reference and their roles in navigation. Physiol Rev 91:1245–1279

    Article  PubMed Central  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • McHugh TJ, Blum KI, Tsien JZ, Tonegawa S, Wilson MA (1996) Impaired hippocampal representation of space in CA1-specific NMDAR1 knockout mice. Cell 87:1339–1349

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • McNaughton BL, Battaglia FP, Jensen O, Moser EI, Moser M (2006) Path integration and the neural basis of the ‘cognitive map’. Nat Rev Neurosci 7:663–678

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Moser EI, Kropff E, Moser M (2008) Place cells, grid cells, and the brain’s spatial representation system. Ann Rev Neurosci 31:69–89

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Muller R (1996) A quarter of a century of place cells. Neuron 17:979–990

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • O’Keefe J, Dostrovsky J (1971) The hippocampus as a spatial map: preliminary evidence from unit activity in the freely-moving rat. Brain Res 34:171–175

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • O’Leary TP, Brown RE (2012) The effects of apparatus design and test procedure on learning and memory performance of C57BL/6 J mice on the Barnes maze. J Neurosci Meth 203:315–324

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • O’Leary TP, Savoie V, Brown RE (2011) Learning, memory and search strategies of inbred mouse strains with different visual abilities in the Barnes maze. Behav Brain Res 216:531–542

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Passino E, Middei S, Restivo L, Bertaina-Anglade V, Ammassari-Teule M (2002) Genetic approach to variability of memory systems: analysis of place vs. response learning and Fos-related expression in hippocampal and striatal areas of C57BL/6 and DBA/2 mice. Hippo 12:63–75

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Peckford G, McRae SM, Thorpe CM, Martin GM, Skinner DM (2013) Rats’ orientation at the start point is important for spatial learning in a water T-maze. Learn Motiv 44:1–15

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Prusky GT, West PWR, Douglas RM (2000) Behavioral assessment of visual acuity in mice and rats. Vis Res 40:2201–2209

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Rotenberg A, Mayford M, Hawkins RD, Kandel ER, Muller RU (1996) Mice expressing activated CaMKII lack low frequency LTP and do not form stable place cells in the CA1 region of the hippocampus. Cell 87:1351–1361

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Sheynikhovich D, Chavarriaga R, Strosslin T, Arleo A, Gerstner W (2009) Is there a geometric module for spatial orientation? Insight from a rodent navigation model. Psy Rev 116:540–566

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Skinner DM, Etchegary CM, Ekert-Maret EC, Baker CJ, Harley CW, Evans JH, Martin GM (2003) An analysis of response, direction, and place learning in an open field and T maze. J Exp Psychol Anim Behav Proc 29:3–13

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Skinner DM, Horne MR, Murphy KEA, Martin GM (2010) Rats’ orientation is more important than start point location for successful place learning. J Exp Psychol Anim Behav Proc 36:110–116

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Stackman RW, Lora JC, Williams SB (2012) Directional responding of C57BL/6 J mice in the Morris water maze is influenced by visual and vestibular cues and is dependent on the anterior thalamic nuclei. J Neurosci 32:10211–10225

    Article  CAS  PubMed Central  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Stringer KG, Martin GM, Skinner DM (2005) The effects of hippocampal lesions on response, direction and place learning in rats. Behav Neurosci 119:946–952

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Sturzl W, Cheung A, Cheng K, Zeil J (2008) The information content of panoramic images I: the rotational errors and the similarity of views in rectangular experimental arenas. J Exp Psychol Anim Behav Proc 34:1–14

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sung JY, Goo JS, Lee DE, Jin DQ, Bizon JL, Gallagher M, Han JS (2008) Learning strategy selection in the water maze and hippocampal CREB phosphorylation differ in two inbred strains of mice. Learn Mem 15:183–188

    Article  CAS  PubMed Central  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Taube JS (2007) The head direction signal: origins and sensory-motor integration. Ann Rev Neurosci 30:181–207

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Taube JS, Muller RU, Ranck JB Jr (1990a) Head-direction cells recorded from the postsubiculum in freely moving rats. I Description and quantitative analysis. J Neurosci 10:420–435

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Taube JS, Muller RU, Ranck JB Jr (1990b) Head-direction cells recorded from the postsubiculum in freely moving rats. II Effects of environmental manipulations. J Neurosci 10:436–447

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Tunur T, Dohanich GP, Schrader LA (2010) Pre-exposure to context affects learning strategy selection in mice. Learn Mem 17:328–331

    Article  PubMed Central  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Wahlsten D, Cooper SF, Crabb JC (2005) Different rankings of inbred mouse strains on the morris maze and a refined 4-arm water escape task. Behav Brain Res 165:36–51

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Whishaw IQ (1995) A comparison of rats and mice in a swimming pool place task and matching to place task: some surprising differences. Physiol Behav 58:687–693

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Whishaw IQ, Tomie JA (1996) Of mice and mazes: similarities between mice and rats on dry-land but not water mazes. Physiol Behav 60:1191–1197

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Whyte JT, Martin GM, Skinner DM (2009) An assessment of response, direction and place learning by rats in a water T-maze. Learn Motiv 40:376–385

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Yoder RM, Taube JS (2009) Head direction cell activity in mice: robust directional signal depends on intact otolith organs. J Neurosci 29:1061–1076

    Article  CAS  PubMed Central  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgments

This work was supported by an NSERC Grant to DMS.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Department of Psychology, Memorial University of Newfoundland, St. John’s, NL, A1B 3X9, Canada

    Shaina P. A. Cahill, Kathleen E. Fifield, Christina M. Thorpe, Gerard M. Martin & Darlene M. Skinner

Authors
  1. Shaina P. A. Cahill
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Kathleen E. Fifield
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. Christina M. Thorpe
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  4. Gerard M. Martin
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  5. Darlene M. Skinner
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Darlene M. Skinner.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Cahill, S.P.A., Fifield, K.E., Thorpe, C.M. et al. Mice use start point orientation to solve spatial problems in a water T-maze. Anim Cogn 18, 195–203 (2015). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10071-014-0789-1

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10071-014-0789-1

Keywords

Search

Navigation