Skip to main content
Log in

Performance on patterned string problems by common marmosets (Callithrix jacchus)

  • Short Communication
  • Published:
Animal Cognition Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

This experiment examined the performance of common marmosets (Callithrix jacchus) on a series of patterned string problems to assess the marmosets’ understanding of means–ends relationships. One marmoset, Jet, was exposed to a series of problems that were ordered in terms of perceived difficulty during two testings that were separated by 1 year. In the second testing, Jet received problems that had been used during the first testing along with three new problems. Each of the new problems was designed to be an exemplar of the type of problem that Jet had experienced difficulty with in the first testing. A second marmoset, Peaches, was tested on the same set of problems given to Jet in the second testing. Results indicated that the marmosets’ performance on these problems fell into three categories. In one category, some problems were solved without evidence of trial-and-error learning. In a second category, there were problems in which the marmosets responded at chance levels initially but evidenced improvement as a function of extended testing. In a third category, some problems appeared to be virtually unsolvable even with extended testing. Taken together, these results indicate that the marmosets were able to learn the means–ends connection between pulling a string and obtaining food. This learning was best characterized as a trial-and-error process for some problem forms, while for others there appeared to be rapid learning that did not require extensive practice. The instances of rapid learning may be the result of the application of a simple spatial proximity rule in which the marmosets chose the string that was closest to an imaginary line drawn between the marmoset and the reinforcer.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Fig. 1

References

  • Alberto PA, Troutman AC (2006) Applied behavior analysis for teachers (7th ed). Pearson Education, Upper Saddle River, NJ

    Google Scholar 

  • Beck BB (1967) A study of problem solving by gibbons. Behaviour 28:95–109

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Birch HG (1945) The role of motivational factors in insightful problem-solving. J Comp Psychol 38:295–317

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Carr H, Watson JB (1908) Orientation in the White Rat. J Comp Neurol Psychol 18:27–44

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Diedrich FJ, Thelen E, Smith LB, Corbetta D (2000) Motor memory is a factor in infant perseverative errors. Dev Sci 3:479–494

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Epstein R, Kirshni CE, Lanza RP, Rubin LC (1984) ‘Insight’ in the pigeon: antecedents and determinants of an intelligent performance. Nature 308:61–62

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Gould JL, Gould CG (1994) The animal mind. Scientific American Library/Scientific American Books, New York

    Google Scholar 

  • Halsey LG, Bezerra BM, Souto AS (2006) Can wild common marmosets (Callithrix jacchus) solve the parallel strings task? Anim Cogn 9:229–233

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Hauser MD, Kralik J, Botto-Mahan C (1999) Problem solving and functional design features: experiments on cotton-top tamarins, Saguinus oedipus. Anim Behav 57:565–582

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Hauser MD, Williams T, Kralik JD, Moskovitz D (2001) What guides a search for food that has disappeared? Experiments on cotton-top tamarins (Saguinus oedipus). J Comp Psychol 115:140–151

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Hauser MD, Pearson H, Seelig D (2002) Ontogeny of tool use in cottontop tamarins, Saguinus oedipus : innate recognition of functionally relevant features. Anim Behav 64:299–311

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Heinrich B, Bugnyar T (2005) Testing problem solving in ravens: string-pulling to reach food. Ethology 111:962–976

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hood BM, Hauser MD, Anderson L, Santos L (1999) Gravity biases in a non-human primate? Dev Sci 2:35–41

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Huber L, Gajdon GK (2006) Technical intelligence in animals: the kea model. Anim Cogn 9:295–305

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Itoh K, Izumi A, Kojima S (2001) Object discrimination learning in aged Japanese monkeys. Behav Neurosci 115:259–270

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Köhler W (1925/1976) The mentality of apes. In: Winter E, (Trans.), Liveright, Oxford

  • Monk CS, Gunderson VM, Gran KS, Mechling JL (1996) A demonstration of the memory savings effect in infant monkeys. Dev Psychol 32:1051–1055

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Osthaus B, Lea SG, Slate AM (2005) Dogs (Canis lupus familiaris) fail to show understanding of means-end connections in a string-pulling task. Anim Cogn 8:37–47

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Osthaus B, Marlow D, Ducat P (2010) Minding the gap: spatial perseveration error in dogs. Anim Cogn 13:881–885

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Pepperberg IM (2004) ‘Insightful’ string-pulling in Grey parrots (Psittacus erithacus) is affected by vocal competence. Anim Cogn 7:263–266

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Schiller PH (1957) Innate motor action as a basis of Learning. In: Schiller CH (ed) Instinctive behavior; the development of a modern concept. International University Press, Oxford, pp 264–287

    Google Scholar 

  • Seibt U, Wickler W (2006) Individuality in problem solving: string pulling in two Carduelis Species (Aves: Passeriformes). Ethology 112:493–502

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Taylor AH, Medina FS, Holzhaider JC, Hearne LJ, Hunt GR, Gray RD (2010) An investigation into the cognition behind spontaneous string pulling in New Caledonian crows. PLoS ONE 5:e9345

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Thorpe WH (1964) Learning and Instinct in animals. Methuen, London

    Google Scholar 

  • Tomasello M, Call J (1997) Primate cognition. New York, Oxford

    Google Scholar 

  • Vince MA (1961) String-pulling in birds: III. The successful response in greenfinches and canaries. Behaviour 17:103–129

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Whitt E, Douglas M, Osthaus B, Hocking I (2009) Domestic cats (Felis catus) do not show causal understanding in a string-pulling task. Anim Cogn 12:739–743

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgments

This work was supported by grant RR00168 from the National Institutes of Health (NIH) to the New England Primate Research Center (NEPRC), Southborough, MA, and by NIH grant R15 RR031220-01A1, C. Locurto, PI. We thank the staff at NEPRC for its support of this work.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Charles Locurto.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Gagne, M., Levesque, K., Nutile, L. et al. Performance on patterned string problems by common marmosets (Callithrix jacchus). Anim Cogn 15, 1021–1030 (2012). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10071-012-0511-0

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10071-012-0511-0

Keywords

Navigation