Skip to main content
Log in

Pigeons discriminate between human feeders

  • Short Communication
  • Published:
Animal Cognition Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Considered as plague in many cities, pigeons in urban areas live close to human activities and exploit this proximity to find food which is often directly delivered by people. In this study, we explored the capacity of feral pigeons to take advantage of this human-based food resource and discriminate between friendly and hostile people. Our study was conducted in an urban park. Pigeons were fed by two experimenters of approximately the same age and skin colour but wearing coats of different colours. During the training sessions, the two human feeders displayed different attitudes: one of the feeders was neutral and the second was hostile and chased away the pigeons. During the two test phases subsequent to the training phase, both feeders became neutral. Two experiments were conducted, one with one male and one female feeder and the second with two female feeders. In both experiments, the pigeons learned to quickly (six to nine sessions) discriminate between the feeders and maintained this discrimination during the test phases. The pigeons avoided the hostile feeder even when the two feeders exchanged their coats, suggesting that they used stable individual characteristics to differentiate between the experimenter feeders. Thus, pigeons are able to learn quickly from their interactions with human feeders and use this knowledge to maximize the profitability of the urban environment. This study provides the first experimental evidence in feral pigeons for this level of human discrimination.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Fig. 1

References

  • Adachi I, Kuwahata H, Fujita K (2007) Dogs recall their owner’s face upon hearing the owner’s voice. Anim Cogn 10:17–21

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Altmann J (1974) Observational study of behaviour: sampling methods. Behaviour 49:227–267

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Aust U, Huber L (2001) The role of item- and category-specific information in the discrimination of people versus non-people images by pigeons. Anim Learn Behav 29:107–119

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Aust U, Huber L (2003) Elemental versus configural perception in a people-present/people-absent discrimination task by pigeons. Learn Behav 31:213–224

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Burger B (1984) Grebes nesting in gull colonies: protective associations and early warning. Am Nat 123:327–337

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cook RG (Ed) (2001) Avian visual cognition. Available via: www.pigeon.psy.tufts.edu/avc/

  • Cook RG, Cavoto BR, Katz JS, Cavoto KK (1997) Pigeon perception and discrimination of rapidly changing texture stimuli. J Exp Psychol Anim Behav Process 23:390–400

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Dittrich WH, Lea SEG (2001) Motion discrimination and recognition. In: Cook RG (ed) Avian visual cognition. Available via: http://pigeon.psy.tufts.edu/avc/dittrich/ default.htm

  • Dittrich L, Adam R, Ünver E, Güntürkün O (2010) Pigeons identify individual humans but show no sign of recognizing them in photographs. Behav Process 83:82–89

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gompertz T (1956) Some observation on the feral pigeon in London. Bird Study 4:2–13

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Goodale E, Kotagama SW (2005) Alarm calling in Sri Lankan mixed species bird flocks. Auk 122:108–120

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Halpin ZT (1991) Kin recognition cues of vertebrates. In: Hepper PG (ed) Kin recognition. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, pp 220–258

    Google Scholar 

  • Herrnstein RJ, Loveland DH (1964) Complex visual concept in the pigeon. Science 146:549–551

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Huber L (2001) Visual categorization in pigeons. In: Cook RG (ed) Avian visual cognition. Available via: http://www.pigeon.psy.tufts.edu/avc/huber/default.htm

  • Jerolmack C (2008) How pigeons became rats: the cultural-spatial logic of problem animals. Soc Probl 55:72–74

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Johnston RF, Janiga M (1995) Feral pigeons. Oxford University Press, Oxford

    Google Scholar 

  • Jokimaki J, Suhonen J (1998) Distribution and habitat selection of wintering birds in urban environments. Landsc Urban Plan 39:253–263

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Levey DJ, Londono GA, Ungvari-Martin J, Hiersoux MR, Jankowski JE, Poulsen JR, Stracey CM, Robinson SK (2009) Urban mockingbirds quickly learn to identify individual humans. PNAS 106:8959–8962

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Marzluff JM, Walls J, Cornell HN, Withey JC, Craig DP (2010) Lasting recognition of threatening people by wild American crows. Anim Behav 79:699–707

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • McCullagh P, Nelder JA (1983) Generalised linear modelling. Chapman & Hall, London

    Google Scholar 

  • Miklósi Á, Soproni K (2006) A comparative analysis of animals’ understanding of the human pointing gesture. Anim Cogn 9:81–93

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Sliwa J, Duhamel JR, Pascalis O, Wirth S (2011) Spontaneous voice–face identity matching by rhesus monkeys for familiar conspecifics and humans. PNAS 108:1735–1740

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Sol D, Senar JC (1995) Urban pigeon population: stability, home range, and the effect of removing individuals. Can J Zool 73:1154–1160

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sol D, Santos DM, Garcia J, Cuadrado M (1998) Competition for food in urban pigeons: the cost of being juvenile. Cooper Ornithol Soc 100:298–304

    Google Scholar 

  • Wilson EO (1975) Sociobiology: the new synthesis. Belknap Press, Cambridge

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgments

A.B. was supported by the French Ministry of National Education. We thank Dr J. Rigoulet, who allowed us free access to the Ménagerie, and the students who helped us to carry out this experiment: Betty Hebert, Justine Philippon, Marie Mercier, Hanifa Challab. This study is part of a larger research program on urban pigeons supported by grants from the ANRJC (ANR-05-JCJC-0098-01), the Region Ile-de-France (no. 06-1064 MN 07) and the Seine-Saint-Denis department.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Ahmed Belguermi.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Belguermi, A., Bovet, D., Pascal, A. et al. Pigeons discriminate between human feeders. Anim Cogn 14, 909–914 (2011). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10071-011-0420-7

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10071-011-0420-7

Keywords

Navigation