Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

Evaluation of TBM performance prediction models and sensitivity analysis of input parameters

  • Original Paper
  • Published:
Bulletin of Engineering Geology and the Environment Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

In recent years, anumber of models and formulas have been proposed to estimate the penetration rate of hard rock tunnel boring machines (TBMs). This study will focus on sensitivity analysis and examination of the effects of variation in the input parameters on the results of the commonly used performance prediction models for rock TBMs. The results of modeling were compared with the recorded machine performance to evaluate the validity and accuracy of these models. The sensitivity analysis of the four most common models indicates that uniaxial compressive strength followed by rock mass fracturing is among the most influential parameters used in these models. In addition, the result of our analysis shows that increasing the number of independent input variables does not increase the accuracy of prediction. The effect of discontinuity orientation in some models has also been considered. The results indicate that substantial changes in the angle between the discontinuity orientation and the tunnel axis have minor effects on penetration rate. The results of models were compared to recorded TBM penetration rate during excavation of Golab Tunnel, and the results indicate that the Gong model has the lowest error in comparison with other models. Grouping the rock types and using pertinent equations in the Farrokh model offered overall higher accuracy than other models in some structures of the Golab project. A brief set of recommendations are offered about the models and their applicability to various ground conditions.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5
Fig. 6
Fig. 7
Fig. 8

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Aeberli U, Wanner W (1978) On the influence of discontinuities at the application of tunneling machines. In: Proceedings of the 3rd international congress IAEG, Madrid

  • Alber M (1996) Prediction of penetration and utilization for hard rock TBMs. In: Proceedings of the International Conference of Eurock

  • Barton N (1999) TBM performance estimation in rock using QTBM. Tunn Tunn Int 31(9):41–48

    Google Scholar 

  • Bieniawski Z, Grandori R (2007) Predicting TBM Excavability-Part II. Tunn Tunn Int

  • Bieniawski Z, Tamames B, Fernandez J, Hernandez M (2006) Rock mass excavability (RME) indicator: new way to selecting the optimum tunnel construction method. International Congress ITA, Seul (Korea)

    Google Scholar 

  • Bieniawski Z, Celada B, Galera J (2007) TBM excavability: prediction and machine-rock interaction. RETC, Toronto, pp 1118

    Google Scholar 

  • Cassinelli FS Cina, Innaurato N (1983) Power consumption and metal wear in tunnel-boring machines: analysis of tunnel-boring operation in hard rock: In: Tunneling 82, Proceedings of the 3rd International Symposium, Brighton, 7–11 June 1982, P73–81. Publ London: IMM, 1982. International Journal of Rock Mechanics and Mining Sciences & Geomechanics Abstracts, Pergamon

  • Delisio A, Zhao J, Einstein H (2013) Analysis and prediction of TBM performance in blocky rock conditions at the Lötschberg Base Tunnel. Tunn Undergr Space Technol 33:131–142

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Farmer I, Glossop N (1980) Mechanics of disc cutter penetration. Tunn Tunn 12(6):22–25

    Google Scholar 

  • Farrokh E, Rostami J, Laughton C (2012) Study of various models for estimation of penetration rate of hard rock TBMs. Tunn Undergr Space Technol 30:110–123

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ghasemi E, Yagiz S, Ataei M (2014) Predicting penetration rate of hard rock tunnel boring machine using fuzzy logic. Bull Eng Geol Environ 73(1):23–35

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gong Q, Zhao J (2009) Development of a rock mass characteristics model for TBM penetration rate prediction. Int J Rock Mech Min Sci 46(1):8–18

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gong Q, Zhao J, Jiang Y (2007) In situ TBM penetration tests and rock mass boreability analysis in hard rock tunnels. Tunn Undergr Space Technol 22(3):303–316

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hamilton W, Dollinger G (1979) Optimizing tunnel boring machine and cutter design for greater boreability. RETC Proc Atlanta 1:280–296

    Google Scholar 

  • Hassanpour J, Rostami J, Khamehchiyan M, Bruland A (2009) Developing new equations for TBM performance prediction in carbonate-argillaceous rocks: a case history of Nowsood water conveyance tunnel. Geomech Geoengin Int J 4(4):287–297

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hassanpour J, Rostami J, Khamehchiyan M, Bruland A, Tavakoli H (2010) TBM performance analysis in pyroclastic rocks: a case history of Karaj water conveyance tunnel. Rock Mech Rock Eng 43(4):427–445

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hassanpour J, Rostami J, Zhao J (2011) A new hard rock TBM performance prediction model for project planning. Tunn Undergr Space Technol 26(5):595–603

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Imensazan Consulting Co. (2006) Engineering Gelogical report of Golab Tunnel

  • Innaurato N, Mancini A, Rondena E, Zaninetti A (1991) Forecasting and effective TBM performances in a rapid excavation of a tunnel in Italy. 7th ISRM Congress

  • Kahraman S (2002) Correlation of TBM and drilling machine performances with rock brittleness. Eng Geol 65(4):269–283

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Khademi Hamidi J, Shahriar K, Rezai B, Rostami J (2010) Performance prediction of hard rock TBM using Rock Mass Rating (RMR) system. Tunn Undergr Space Technol 25(4):333–345

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Nelson P, Ingraffea A, O’Rourke T (1985) TBM performance prediction using rock fracture parameters. Int J Rock Mech Min Sci Geomech Abstr, Elsevier

  • Ozdemir L, Wang F-D (1979) Mechanical tunnel boring prediction and machine design. NASA STI/Recon Tech Rep N 80:16239

    Google Scholar 

  • Ramamurthy T (2008) Penetration rate of TBMs. World Tunnel Congress

  • Ribacchi R, Fazio AL (2005) Influence of rock mass parameters on the performance of a TBM in a gneissic formation (Varzo Tunnel). Rock Mech Rock Eng 38(2):105–127

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rostami J (1997) Development of a force estimation model for rock fragmentation with disc cutters through theoretical modeling and physical measurement of crushed zone pressure, Colorado School of Mines

  • Rostami J (2016) Performance prediction of hard rock Tunnel Boring Machines (TBMs) in difficult ground. Tunn Undergr Space Technol 57:173–182

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rostami J, Ozdemir L (1993) A new model for performance prediction of hard rock TBMs. In: Proceedings of the Rapid Excavation and Tunneling Conference, SOCIETY FOR MINING, METALLOGY & EXPLORATION, INC

  • Rostami J, Ozdemir L, Nilson B (1996) Comparison between CSM and NTH hard rock TBM performance prediction models. In: Proceedings of Institute of Shaft Drilling Technology (ISDT) annual technical conference

  • Roxborough FF, Phillips HR (1975) Rock excavation by disc cutter. Int J Rock Mech Min Sci Geomech Abstr, Elsevier

  • Sanio H (1985) Prediction of the performance of disc cutters in anisotropic rock. Int J Rock Mech Min Sci Geomech Abstr, Elsevier

  • Sapigni M, Berti M, Bethaz E, Busillo A, Cardone G (2002) TBM performance estimation using rock mass classifications. Int J Rock Mech Min Sci 39(6):771–788

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sato K, Gong F, Itakura K (1991). Prediction of disc cutter performance using a circular rock cutting ring. In: Proceedings 1st international mine mechanization and automation symposium

  • Shaterpour A, Tumac D, Avunduk E (2016) Double shield TBM performance analysis in difficult ground conditions: a case study in the Gerede water tunnel, Turkey. Bull Eng Geol Environ 75(1):251–262

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Snowdon R, Ryley M, Temporal J (1982) A study of disc cutting in selected British rocks. Int J Rock Mech Min Sci Geomech Abstr, Elsevier

  • Sundaram N, Rafek A, Komoo I (1998). The influence of rock mass properties in the assessment of TBM performance. In: Proceedings of the Eighth IAEG Congress, Vancouver, Balkema

  • Sundin N-O, Wanstedt S (1994) A boreability model for TBM’s. rock mechanics models and measurements challenges from industry. In: Proceedings of the 1st North American Rock Mechanics Symposium, The University of Texas at Austin, Balkema, Rotterdam

  • Yagiz S (2008) Utilizing rock mass properties for predicting TBM performance in hard rock condition. Tunn Undergr Space Technol 23(3):326–339

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Yasar S, Capik M, Yilmaz AO (2015) Cuttability assessment using the drilling rate index (DRI). Bull Eng Geol Environ 74(4):1349–1361

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Department of Mining Engineering, Tarbiat Modares University, Tehran, Iran

    Seyyed Amirasad Fatemi & Morteza Ahmadi

  2. Department of Mining Engineering, Earth Mechanics Institute, Colorado School of Mines, Golden, USA

    Jamal Rostami

Authors
  1. Seyyed Amirasad Fatemi
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Morteza Ahmadi
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. Jamal Rostami
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Seyyed Amirasad Fatemi.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Fatemi, S.A., Ahmadi, M. & Rostami, J. Evaluation of TBM performance prediction models and sensitivity analysis of input parameters. Bull Eng Geol Environ 77, 501–513 (2018). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10064-016-0967-2

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10064-016-0967-2

Keywords

Search

Navigation