Skip to main content
Log in

Modification of rock mass strength assessment methods and their application in geotechnical engineering

  • Original Paper
  • Published:
Bulletin of Engineering Geology and the Environment Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Due to complicated structures and discontinuities in surrounding rock mass, existing empirical failure criteria cannot meet the requirements of engineering practice such as tunnels. To improve estimation accuracy on the strength of rock mass with joints, a modified chart of the Geological Strength Index using Hoek–Brown criteria was further tested to estimate rock mass strength [Lin et al. (2014) Bull Eng Geol Environ 4(73):1245–1258], and, in this paper, new strength estimation equations for jointed rock mass were then modified based on a large dataset obtained from Chinese projects. Here, standard drilling time is first introduced and described in this study, and then used as a parameter to estimate rock strength. Different empirical formulas based on joint density, rock mass classification, Hoek–Brown criteria, and elastic wave velocity are thus used to estimate rock mass strength by using data from the Jiubao tunnel. The results estimated based on different empirical formulas were similar, indicating that the modified assessment method presented in this paper can be used to estimate rock mass strength under certain circumstances. Cross-correlation of different empirical methods provides significant confidence in predicted rock mass strength calculations.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5
Fig. 6
Fig. 7
Fig. 8
Fig. 9
Fig. 10
Fig. 11

Similar content being viewed by others

Abbreviations

N :

Total number of joints in a rock mass specimen

f :

Correlation coefficient based on different engineering types

σ cm :

Uniaxial compressive strength of rock mass (MPa)

σ c :

Uniaxial compressive strength of rock (MPa)

σ sc :

Saturated compressive strength of a rock specimen (MPa)

σ dc :

Dry compressive strength of a rock specimen (MPa)

σ 1 :

Major principal compressive stresses at peak strength (MPa)

σ 3 :

Minor principal compressive stresses at peak strength (MPa)

γ :

Unit weight of rock mass

V pm :

Wave velocity of longitudinal waves in the jointed rock (km/s)

V pc :

Wave velocity of longitudinal waves in the intact rock (km/s)

RMR:

Rock mass rating

Q :

Rock mass quality

Jr:

Joint roughness

Ja:

Joint alteration

RMC:

Rock mineral condition

RCL:

Rock core length

Dt:

Drilling time (min/m)

References

  • Aydan Ö, Ulusay R, Tokashiki N (2015) Rock mass quality rating (RMQR) system and its application to the estimation of geomechanical characteristics of rock masses. In: Lollino G, Giordan D, Thuro K, Carranza-Torres C, Wu F, Marinos P, Delgado C (eds) Engineering geology for society and territory, vol 6. Springer, Berlin, pp 769–772

  • Barton N (ed) (2007) Rock quality, seismic velocity: attenuation and anisotropy. Taylor & Francis, London, pp 12–16

    Google Scholar 

  • Bertuzzi R (2015) Forming a view of the rock mass strength of Hawkesbury sandstone from tunnelling case histories. In: 13th ISRM international congress of rock mechanics. International Society for Rock Mechanics

  • Bieniawski ZT (1974) Determing rock mass deformability experience from histories. Int J Rock Mech Min Sci 15:237–247

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Brown ET, Brady BH (2013) Rock mechanics: for underground mining. Springer, Dordrecht, pp 32–42

    Google Scholar 

  • Carter TG, Marinos V (2014) Use of GSI for rock engineering design. In: Proceedings 1st international conference on applied empirical design methods in mining. Lima, Peru

  • Carter TG, Diederichs MS, Carvalho JL (2008) Application of modified Hoek–Brown transition relationships for assessing strength and post yield behaviour at both ends of the rock competence scale. J S Afr Inst Min Metall 108(6):325–338

    Google Scholar 

  • Colback PSB, Wiid BL (1965) The influence of moisture content on the compressive strength of rock. In: Proceedings of the 3rd Canadian symposium of rock mechanics, Toronto, pp 65–83

  • GB 50218-2014 (2014) Standard for engineering classification of rock masses. China Plan, Beijing, pp 13–18

    Google Scholar 

  • Hoek E, Martin CD (2014) Fracture initiation and propagation in intact rock—a review. J Rock Mech Geotech Eng 6(4):287–300

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hoek E, Carranza Torres C, Corkum B. Hoek-Brown failure criterion—2002 edition. In: Proceedings of the Fifth North American Rock Mechanics Symposium, Toronto, Canada, vol. 1, pp 267–273

  • Hoek E, Carter TG, Diederichs MS (2013) Quantification of the Geological Strength Index chart. 47th US Rock Mechanics/Geomechanics Symposium, San Francisco. American Rock Mechanics Association, Alexandria, VA, 13:672

  • Jaeger JC, Cook NGW (1976) Fundamentals of rock mechanics. Chapman and Hall, London, pp 12–23

    Google Scholar 

  • Li G, Yang M, Meng Y et al (2016) The assessment of correlation between rock drillability and mechanical properties in the laboratory and in the field under different pressure conditions. J Nat Gas Sci Eng 30:405–413

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lin D (2012) Study on rock mass structure and geophysics features for granite in shallow—take CSNS for example (in Chinese). Graduate University of the Chinese Academy of Sciences, Bejing, pp 31–39

  • Lin D, Sun Y, Zhang W, Yuan R, He W, Wang B, Shang Y (2014) Modifications to the GSI for granite in drilling. Bull Eng Geol Environ 4(73):1245–1258

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Marinos VP (2012) Assessing rock mass behaviour for tunnelling. Environ Eng Geosci 18(4):327–341

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • McClintock FA, Walsh JB (1962). Friction on Griffith cracks in rocks under pressure. In: Proceedings of the 4th US National Congress Applied Mechanics. American Society of Mechanical Engineers, New York, pp 1015–1021

  • Nilsen B, Dahl F, Holzhäuser J et al (2007) New test methodology for estimating the abrasiveness of soils for TBM tunneling. In: Proceedings of the rapid excavation and tunneling conference (RETC), pp 104–106

  • Sun GZ (2011) Mechanics of rock mass structure (in Chinese). Science, Beijing, pp 101–120

    Google Scholar 

  • Sun H, Zhao Y, Shang Y et al (2012) Deep-seated slope failures induced by inappropriate cutting in China. Rock Mech Rock Eng 45: 1103. doi:10.1007/s00603-012-0292-4

  • TB10077-2001 (2001) Standard for railway engineering classification of rock soil (in Chinese). Railway, Beijing, pp 6–7

    Google Scholar 

  • Vardar M (1977) Zeiteinfluss aufdes Bruchverhalten des Gebriges in der Umgebung yon Tunbdn. VerOff. D. inst. F. Bodenmech., University of Karlsruhe, Heft, p 72

  • Wang J, Li S-C, Li L-P, Zhu W, Zhang Q-Q, Song S-G (2014) Study on anchorage effect on fractured rock. Steel and composite structures. Int J 17(6):791–801

    Google Scholar 

  • Water Hydropower Institute of Science and Technology, Water Hydropower Planning Institute, Water Hydropower Intelligence Institute etc. (1991) Handbook of rock mechanics parameters (in Chinese). Water Hydropower Press, Beijing, pp 15–295

  • Yarali O, Soyer E (2013) Assessment of relationships between drilling rate index and mechanical properties of rocks. Tunn Undergr Space Technol 33:46–53

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Renmao Yuan.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Lin, D., Wang, K., Li, K. et al. Modification of rock mass strength assessment methods and their application in geotechnical engineering. Bull Eng Geol Environ 76, 1471–1480 (2017). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10064-016-0952-9

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10064-016-0952-9

Keywords

Navigation