Abstract
With the continuous development of the technology of underground coal gasification (UGC), it gradually moves into commercial development. However, there is limited measured data and related research on the overlying strata and surface movement rule caused by underground coal gasification, which has severely restricted the further application of underground coal gasification. In order to solve the problem of surface subsidence prediction of underground coal gasification, this numerical simulation software, FLAC3D, is adopted to study the differences of overlying strata and the surface movement rule of UGC strip mining (UCG mining) and strip mining, and the differences of prediction parameters under different recovery ratios. The model is established according to the geological and mining conditions of the underground coal gasification experiment area in China. The research results show that overlying strata and surface movement rules of UCG mining and strip mining are similar. So, the surface subsidence prediction of UCG mining can refer the prediction method of strip mining. Meanwhile, the difference values of surface movement extrema under different recovery ratios are less than 5 mm and the difference values of surface subsidence boundary are not more than 10 m. Therefore, the surface subsidence prediction parameters of UCG mining can be chosen as the corresponding prediction parameters of strip mining. Finally, the surface subsidence prediction method of UCG mining is proposed based on the above research results and prediction software is compiled for engineering application. Research results have important theoretical and practical significance for promoting the application of underground coal gasification.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Akbarzadeh H, Chalaturnyk RJ (2014) Structural changes in coal at elevated temperature pertinent to underground coal gasification: a review[J]. Int J Coal Geol 131:126–146
Bahl S, Barbero G, Hwang JJ et al (2014) Underground Coal Gasification[M]. Norwegian University of Science and Technology, Norway
Bhaskaran S, Ganesh A, Mahajani S et al (2013) Comparison between two types of Indian coals for the feasibility of Underground Coal Gasification through laboratory scale experiments[J]. Fuel 113:837–843
Bhutto AW, Bazmi AA, Zahedi G (2013) Underground coal gasification: from fundamentals to applications[J]. Prog Energy Combust Sci 39(1):189–214
Gadonneix P, de Castro FB, de Medeiros NF et al (2010) 2010 Survey of Energy Resources[R]. World Energy Council, London
Guo W, Deng K, Zou Y (2005) Nonlinear theoretical study and application of strip mining[M]. China University of Mining and Technology Press, Xuzhou (in Chinese)
He G, Ling G, Yang L (1991) Mining subsidence [M]. China University of Mining and Technology Press, Xuzhou (in Chinese)
Liang J, Yu L (2002) New underground coal gasification technology of “Long passage, Large Section”[J]. China Coal 28(12):8–10 (in Chinese)
Liu HT, Chen F, Pan X et al (2011) Method of oxygen-enriched two-stage underground coal gasification[J]. Min Sci Technol 21(2):191–196 (in Chinese)
Luo J, Wang L, Tang F et al (2011) Variation in the temperature field of rocks overlying a high-temperature cavity during underground coal gasification[J]. Min Sci Technol 21(5):709–713 (in Chinese)
Klimenko AY (2009) Early ideas in underground coal gasification and their evolution[J]. Energies 2(2):456–476
Krause E, Krzemień A, Smoliński A (2015) Analysis and assessment of a critical event during an underground coal gasification experiment[J]. J Loss Prev Process Ind 33:173–182
Najafi M, Jalali SME, KhaloKakaie R (2014) Thermal–mechanical–numerical analysis of stress distribution in the vicinity of underground coal gasification (UCG) panels[J]. Int J Coal Geol 134:1–16
Pankiewicz-Sperka M, Stańczyk K, Płaza GA et al (2014) Assessment of the chemical, microbiological and toxicological aspects of post-processing water from underground coal gasification[J]. Ecotoxicol Environ Saf 108:294–301
Siemens CW (1868) XXXIII.—On the regenerative gas furnace as applied to the manufacture of cast steel[J]. J Chem Soc 21:279–310
Tang F (2013) Fracture evolution and breakage of overlying strata of combustion space area in underground coal gasification [D]. China University of Mining and Technology, Xuzhou (in Chinese)
Xin L, Wang ZT, Huang WG et al (2014) Measurement analysis of overlying strata movement and surface subsidence by UCG strip mining[J]. J Min Saf Eng 31(3):447–455 (in Chinese)
Zou Y, Deng K, Ma Y (2003) Mining subsidence Engineering[M]. China University of Mining and Technology Press, Xuzhou (in Chinese)
Younger PL (2011) Hydrogeological and geomechanical aspects of underground coal gasification and its direct coupling to carbon capture and storage[J]. Mine Water Environ 30(2):127–140
Acknowledgments
This work was funded by the Fundamental Research Funds for the Central University (No. 2013QNB07), the National Scientific and Technical Supporting Programs Fund of China (No. 2012BAB13B03), the Project of Graduate Research and Innovation of Ordinary University in Jiangsu Province (No. CXZZ13_0936), and the NASS Key Laboratory of Land Environment and Disaster Monitoring (No. LEDM2014B04). The authors would also like to thank the anonymous reviewers for their comments and suggestions.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Li, Hz., Guo, Gl., Zha, Jf. et al. Research on the surface movement rules and prediction method of underground coal gasification. Bull Eng Geol Environ 75, 1133–1142 (2016). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10064-015-0809-7
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10064-015-0809-7