Abstract
In this study, stochastic and probabilistic seismic hazard procedures are used to estimate the seismic hazard for wind turbine tower sites in Zafarana Wind Farm, Gulf of Suez, Egypt. The seismic activity in and around the study area, which includes many active fault systems along the Gulf of Suez resulting in many moderate and strong earthquakes, has been well described. These earthquakes result in major stress drops in the Eastern desert and Gulf of Suez area. These recent findings have helped to reshape the seismotectonic environment of the Gulf of Suez area, which is a perplexing tectonic domain. Based on the new information and data collected, the seismic hazard for the Gulf of Suez region, particularly the wind turbine towers in Zafarana Wind Farm and its vicinity, was reexamined using probabilistic and stochastic approaches. Alternate seismic source and magnitude-frequency relations combined with various indigenous and “foreign” attenuation relationships were adopted within a logic tree formulation to quantify and project the regional exposure on a set of hazard maps. The hazard maps showed the peak horizontal ground acceleration and spectral acceleration at PGA, 0.1, 2.0 and 4.0 s. These acceleration levels were computed for 20 and 10 % probabilities of being exceeded in 50 years. Finally, the 0.5, 1, 5, 10 and 20 % damping median response spectra are provided for wind turbine towers in Zafarana Wind Farm site based upon a stochastic simulation technique and on borrowed attenuation relationships.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Abd el-Aal AK (2008) Simulating time-histories and pseudo-spectral accelerations from the 1992 Cairo Earthquake at the proposed El-Fayoum New City Site. Egypt Acta Geophysica 56:1025–1042. doi:10.2478/s11600-008-0054-6
Abd el-aal AK (2010a) Modeling of seismic hazard at the northeastern part of greater Cairo metropolitan area, Egypt. J Geophys Eng 7(75–90):2010. doi:10.1088/1742-2132/7/1/007
Abd el-aal AK (2010b) Ground motion prediction from nearest seismogenic zones in and around Greater Cairo Area, Egypt. Nat Hazards Earth Syst Sci 10:1495–1511. doi:10.5194/nhess-10-1495-2010
Abd el-aal AK (2013) Very broadband seismic background noise analysis of permanent good vaulted seismic stations. J Seismolog 17(2):223–237. doi:10.1007/s10950-012-9308-5
Abd el-aal AK, Soliman MS (2013) New seismic noise models obtained using very broadband stations. Pure Appl Geophy 170(11):1849–1857. doi:10.1007/s00024-013-0640-7
Abrahamson NA (2006) Seismic hazard assessment: problems with current practice and future development, first European conference on earthquake engineering and seismology, Geneva, Switzerland, 3–8 Sep 2006, p 17
Abrahamson NA, Silva WJ (1997) Empirical response spectral attenuation relations for shallow crustal earthquakes Seismol. Res. Lett. 68:94–127
Ambraseys NN (2001) Far-field effects of Eastern Mediterranean earthquakes in Lower Egypt. J Seismol 5:263–268
Ambraseys NN, Melville CP, Adams RD (1994) The seismicity of Egypt, Arabia and the Red Sea, a historical review, King AbdulAziz City for Science and Technology. Cambridge Univ. Press, Amsterdam 137 p
Atkinson GM, Boore DM (1995) Ground motion relations for eastern North America Bull. Seism. Soc. Am. 85:17–30
Bender BK, Perkins DM (1987) SEISRISK III: a computer program for seismic hazard estimation USGS Open File Report 82–293
Bommer JJ, Abrahamson NA, Strasser FO, Pecker A, Bard P-Y, Cotton F, Fäh D, Sabetta F, Scherbaum F, Studer J (2004) The challenge of defining upper bounds on earthquake ground motions Seismol. Res. Lett. 75:82–95
Boore DM (1983) Stochastic simulation of high frequency ground motions based on seismological models of the radiated spectra Bull. Seism. Soc. Am. 73:1865–1894
Boore DM (2003) Simulation of ground motion using the stochastic method Pure Appl. Geophy. 160:635–676
Boore DM (2009) SMSIM—Fortran Programs for Simulating Ground Motions from Earthquakes, Version 2.3—A Revision of OFR 96-80-A, US Geological Survey Open-File Report
Campbell KW, Bozorgnia Y (2003) Updated near-source ground motion (attenuation) relations for the horizontal and vertical components of peak ground acceleration and acceleration response spectra. Bull Seismol Soc Am 93(1):314–331
Cornell CA (1968) Engineering seismic risk analysis. Bull Seismol Soc Am 18:1583–1606
Cornell CA, Merez H (1974) Seismic risk analysis of Boston. J Struct Div Proc ASCE 101:2027–2043
Cotton F, Scherbaum F, Mommer JJ, Bungum H (2006) Criteria for selecting and adjusting ground –motion models for specific target application: application to central Europe and rock sites. J Seismol 10:137–156
Deif A (1998) Seismic hazard assessment in and around Egypt in relation to plate tectonics PhD Thesis Ain Shams Univ. Cairo, Egypt
Frankel A (1995) Mapping seismic hazard in the Central and Eastern United States. Bull Seismol Soc Am 66:8–21
Garfunkel Z, Bartov Y (1977) The tectonics of the Suez rift. Israel Geol Survey Bull 71:44
Giardini D (1999) The global seismic hazard assessment program (GSHAP) 1992–1999. Ann Geofis. 42:957–1230
Gupta IN, Nuttli OW (1976) Spatial attenuation of intensities for central United States earthquakes Bull. Seism. Soc. Am. 66:743–751
Gutenberg B, Richter CF (1944) Seismicity of the earth and associated phenomena. Princeton University Press, Princeton p 310
Hanks TC (1982) Fmax. Bull. Seism. Soc. Am. 72:1867–1879
Hanks TC, Bakun WH (2002) A bilinear source-scaling model or M-logA observations of continental earthquakes. Bull Seismol Soc Am 92:1841–1846
Ibrahim EM, Hattori S (1982) Seismic risk maps for Egypt and its vicinity Helw. Inst Ast Geoph Bull 2:183–207
Kijko A (2004) Estimation of the maximum earthquake magnitude, Mmax. Pure Appl Geophys 161:1655–1681
Kijko A, Retief SJP, Graham G (2002) Seismic hazard and risk assessment for Tulbagh, South Africa: part I—assessment of seismic hazard. Nat Hazards 26:175–201
Maamoun M, Megahed A, Allam A (1984) Seismicity of Egypt. Bull. HIAG 4:109–126
McGuire RK (1978) FRISK: computer program for seismic risk analysis using faults as earthquake sources US Geological Survey Open-File Report 78–107
Mohamed AA (1989) Engineering seismological studies for the north eastern region of Egypt M Sc. thesis, Fac. Sci., Cairo University, Egypt
Moustafa S (2002) Assessment of ground motion variation for seismic hazard mitigation in the vicinity of Cairo metropolitan area Ph. D. thesis, Ain Shams Univ. Cairo, Egypt
Moustafa A, Khalil M (1994) Rejuvenation of the eastern Mediterranean passivecontinental margin in northern and central Sinai: new data from the ThemedFault. Geol Mag 131:435–448
Moustafa AR, Khalil MH (1995) Superposed deformation in the Northern Suez rift, Egypt: relevance to hydrocarbons exploration. J Pet Geol 18:245–266
NRIAG (2011) Bulletin of earthquakes. Institute of Astronomy and Geophysics, Egypt
NRIAG (2012) Bulletin of earthquakes. Institute of Astronomy and Geophysics, Egypt
Puttonen J, Varpasuo P (1982) Seismic risk analysis for northern Iraq Earthquake Eng. Struct. Dyn. 10:605–614
Reiter L (1990) Earthquake hazard analysis. Columbia University Press, New York, p 254
Shafiq U, Muhammad K, Asif A, Abd el-aal AK (2013) Deterministic and probabilistic seismic hazard analysis for Gwadar City, Pakistan. Arab J Geosci 6(9):3481–3492. doi:10.1007/s12517-012-0635-1
Woo G (1996) Kernel estimation methods for seismic hazard area source modeling. Bull Seismol Soc Am 86:353–362
Zahid R, Najeeb A, Shafiq U, Tahir A, Abd el-aal AK (2012) Analysis of Quetta-Ziarat earthquake of 29th October, 2008 in Pakistan. Arab J Geosci 6(6):3481–3492. doi:10.1007/s12517-011-0485-2
Acknowledgments
The research was supported by the US-Egypt Cooperative Research Project, entitled: Seismic Risk Assessment of Wind Turbine Towers in Zafarana Wind Farm, Egypt.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Abd el-aal, A.ea.K., Kamal, H., Abdelhay, M. et al. Probabilistic and stochastic seismic hazard assessment for wind turbine tower sites in Zafarana Wind Farm, Gulf of Suez, Egypt. Bull Eng Geol Environ 74, 1225–1241 (2015). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10064-015-0717-x
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10064-015-0717-x