Abstract
Enactive interfaces must incorporate intuitive activity that characterizes naturalistic perception. However, the manner in which information is presented is not more important than the contents: what information is presented. In this contribution, we address the contents of perception. We argue that people perceive affordances, that is, the possible actions that are available in any given situation. We further argue that enactive interfaces should be designed to optimize presentation of information about the possible actions that are available to a person using the enactive interface. The design of enactive interfaces might be guided by an extension of the theory of ecological interface design (Vicente in Hum Factors 44:62–78, 2002) to include multimodal information that is accessed through fast, intuitive exploratory movement. We review two empirical studies that illustrate our arguments. Careful analysis of affordances, together with our increasing understanding of the enactive perception of affordances, should influence the design of enactive interfaces.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Bingham GP, Schmidt RC, Rosenblum LD (1989) Hefting for maximum distance throw: a smart perceptual mechanism. J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform 15:507–528
Chemero A (2003) An outline of a theory of affordances. Ecol Psychol 15:181–195
Gibson JJ (1986) The ecological approach to visual perception. Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, Mahwah (original work published in 1979)
Konczak J, Meeuwsen HJ, Cress ME (1992) Changing affordances in stair climbing: the perception of maximum climbability in young and older adults. J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform 18:691–697
Mantel B, Bardy BG, Stoffregen TA (2005) Intermodal specification of egocentric distance in a target reaching task. In: Heft H, Marsh KL (eds) Studies in perception and action VIII. Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, Mahwah, pp 173–176
Mark LS, Balliet JA, Craver KD, Douglas SD, Fox T (1990) What an actor must do to perceive the affordance for sitting. Ecol Psychol 2:325–366
Oudejans RRD, Michaels CF, Bakker FC, Dolne M (1996) The relevance of action in perceiving affordances: perception of catchableness of fly balls. J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform 22:683–703
Sanders JT (1997) An ontology of affordances. Ecol Psychol 9:879–891
Stoffregen TA (2003a) Affordances are enough: reply to Chemero et al. (2003). Ecol Psychol 15:29–36
Stoffregen TA (2003b) Affordances as properties of the animal–environment system. Ecol Psychol 15:115–134
Stoffregen TA, Bardy BG (2001) On specification and the senses. Behav Brain Sci 24:195–261
Stoffregen TA, Gorday K, Sheng YY, Flynn SB (1999) Perceiving affordances for another person’s actions. J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform 25:120–136
Stoffregen TA, Yang CM, Bardy BG (2005) Affordance judgments and nonlocomotor body movement. Ecol Psychol 17:75–104
Thelen E, Smith LB (1994) A dynamic systems approach to the development of cognition and action. MIT, Cambridge
Turvey MT (1992) Affordances and prospective control: an outline of the ontology. Ecol Psychol 4:173–187
Varela FJ, Thompson E, Rosch E (1991) The embodied mind. MIT, Cambridge
Vicente KJ (2002) Ecological interface design: progress and challenges. Hum Factors 44:62–78
Warren W (1984) Perceiving affordances: visual guidance of stair climbing. J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform 10:683–703
Yonas A, Hartman B (1993) Perceiving the affordance of contact in four- and five-month old infants. Child Dev 64:298–308
Acknowledgments
Supported by Enactive Interfaces, a network of excellence (IST contract #002114) of the Commission of the European Community, the National Science Foundation (BCS-0236627), the University of Paris XI, The University of Montpellier 1, and the Institut Universitaire de France.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Stoffregen, T.A., Bardy, B.G. & Mantel, B. Affordances in the design of enactive systems. Virtual Reality 10, 4–10 (2006). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10055-006-0025-7
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10055-006-0025-7