Skip to main content
Log in

Use of adenosine diphosphate receptor inhibitor prior to left ventricular assist device implantation is not associated with increased bleeding

  • Original Article
  • Artificial Heart (Clinical)
  • Published:
Journal of Artificial Organs Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Current guidelines recommend adenosine diphosphate receptor inhibitors (ADPRi) be discontinued 5–7 days prior to cardiac surgery due to increased bleeding events, rates of re-exploration, and transfusions. However, the risks of left ventricular assist device (LVAD) implantation in patients taking an ADPRi have not previously been studied. We retrospectively identified 134 eligible patients with ischemic cardiomyopathy that underwent LVAD implantation between July 2009 and August 2013. The cohorts received an ADPRi ≤5 days of surgery (n = 25) versus >5 days prior or not at all (n = 109). Subgroup analyses adjusted for differences in frequency of redo sternotomy between cohorts, excluded patients that received an ADPRi >1 year prior to surgery, and excluded patients with a redo sternotomy. The ADPRi and control groups did not have significant differences in the primary outcomes, intraoperative PRBC units transfused (3.0 vs. 4.0, p = 0.12) or chest tube output within 24 h of surgery (1.66 L vs. 1.80 L, p = 0.61). After adjusting for differences in frequency of redo sternotomy (ADPRi vs. control, 12 vs. 52%, p ≤ 0.001), no significant difference in PRBC units transfused (3.1 vs. 3.5, p = 0.59) or chest tube output (2.04 L vs. 2.04 L, p = 0.98) was seen. No significant difference in 30-day mortality (8.0 vs. 11.0%, p = 0.63), 90-day mortality (16.4 vs. 23.3%, p = 0.42), or length of stay (29.0 vs. 28.0, p = 0.61) was seen. In this single-center experience, use of an ADPRi ≤5 days prior to LVAD implantation was not associated with increased bleeding, length of stay, or mortality.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Rose EA, et al. Long-term use of a left ventricular assist device for end-stage heart failure. N Engl J Med. 2001;345(20):1435–43.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. Miller LW, et al. Use of a continuous-flow device in patients awaiting heart transplantation. N Engl J Med. 2007;357(9):885–96.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. Slaughter MS, et al. Advanced heart failure treated with continuous-flow left ventricular assist device. N Engl J Med. 2009;361(23):2241–51.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Feldman D, et al. The 2013 International Society for Heart and Lung Transplantation Guidelines for mechanical circulatory support: executive summary. J Heart Lung Transplant. 2013;32(2):157–87.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Takeda K, et al. Long-term outcome of patients on continuous-flow left ventricular assist device support. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg. 2014;148(4):1606–14.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Schaffer JM, et al. Bleeding complications and blood product utilization with left ventricular assist device implantation. Ann Thorac Surg. 2011;91(3):740–7 (discussion 747-9).

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Broussard D, et al. Anesthesia for left ventricular assist device insertion: a case series and review. Ochsner J. 2011;11(1):70–7.

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  8. Stulak JM, et al. Adverse events in contemporary continuous-flow left ventricular assist devices: A multi-institutional comparison shows significant differences. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg, 2015.

  9. Berger JS, et al. Impact of clopidogrel in patients with acute coronary syndromes requiring coronary artery bypass surgery: a multicenter analysis. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2008;52(21):1693–701.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. Kremke M, et al. Antiplatelet therapy at the time of coronary artery bypass grafting: a multicentre cohort study. Eur J Cardiothorac Surg. 2013;44(2):e133–40.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. Firanescu CE, et al. Postoperative blood loss in patients undergoing coronary artery bypass surgery after preoperative treatment with clopidogrel. A prospective randomised controlled study. Eur J Cardiothorac Surg. 2009;36(5):856–62.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. Fox KA, et al. Benefits and risks of the combination of clopidogrel and aspirin in patients undergoing surgical revascularization for non-ST-elevation acute coronary syndrome: the Clopidogrel in Unstable angina to prevent Recurrent ischemic Events (CURE) Trial. Circulation. 2004;110(10):1202–8.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. Hillis LD, et al. 2011 ACCF/AHA Guideline for Coronary Artery Bypass Graft Surgery: a report of the American College of Cardiology Foundation/American Heart Association Task Force on Practice Guidelines. Circulation. 2011;124(23):e652–735.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  14. Dang NC, et al. Left ventricular assist device implantation after acute anterior wall myocardial infarction and cardiogenic shock: a two-center study. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg. 2005;130(3):693–8.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  15. Haglund NA, et al. Perioperative blood product use: a comparison between HeartWare and HeartMate II devices. Ann Thorac Surg. 2014;98(3):842–9.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  16. George TJ, et al. Reoperative sternotomy is associated with increased mortality after heart transplantation. Ann Thorac Surg. 2012;94(6):2025–32.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  17. Deja MA, et al. Effects of preoperative aspirin in coronary artery bypass grafting: a double-blind, placebo-controlled, randomized trial. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg. 2012;144(1):204–9.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  18. Alexander KP, et al. Sex differences in major bleeding with glycoprotein IIb/IIIa inhibitors: results from the CRUSADE (Can Rapid risk stratification of Unstable angina patients Suppress ADverse outcomes with Early implementation of the ACC/AHA guidelines) initiative. Circulation. 2006;114(13):1380–7.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  19. Kincaid EH et al. Effects of preoperative enoxaparin versus unfractionated heparin on bleeding indices in patients undergoing coronary artery bypass grafting. Ann Thorac Surg, 2003. 76(1):124–8; discussion 128.

  20. Held C, et al. Ticagrelor versus clopidogrel in patients with acute coronary syndromes undergoing coronary artery bypass surgery: results from the PLATO (Platelet Inhibition and Patient Outcomes) trial. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2011;57(6):672–84.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  21. Ebrahimi R, et al. Outcomes following pre-operative clopidogrel administration in patients with acute coronary syndromes undergoing coronary artery bypass surgery: the ACUITY (Acute Catheterization and Urgent Intervention Triage strategY) trial. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2009;53(21):1965–72.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  22. Kang W, et al. The effect of preoperative clopidogrel on bleeding after coronary artery bypass surgery. J Surg Educ. 2007;64(2):88–92.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  23. Tayara W, et al. Improved survival after acute myocardial infarction complicated by cardiogenic shock with circulatory support and transplantation: comparing aggressive intervention with conservative treatment. J Heart Lung Transplant. 2006;25(5):504–9.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  24. van Werkum JW, et al. Predictors of coronary stent thrombosis: the Dutch Stent Thrombosis Registry. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2009;53(16):1399–409.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  25. Wiviott SD, et al. Prasugrel versus clopidogrel in patients with acute coronary syndromes. N Engl J Med. 2007;357(20):2001–15.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  26. Fitchett D, et al. Antiplatelet therapy and cardiac surgery: review of recent evidence and clinical implications. Can J Cardiol. 2013;29(9):1042–7.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Akinobu Itoh.

Ethics declarations

Conflicts of interest

AT none, MEN none, AA none, JAE none, EN none, JMV none, GAE Thoratec (consultant); HeartWare (consultant), SJR none, SCS Thoratec (consultant); HeartWare (consultant), AI Thoratec (consultant).

Funding sources

This study was supported in part by research funds from the National Institutes of Health (NIH grant U10 HL110309, Heart Failure Network). No relationships with industry.

Electronic supplementary material

Below is the link to the electronic supplementary material.

Supplementary material 1 (DOC 327 kb)

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Tibrewala, A., Nassif, M.E., Andruska, A. et al. Use of adenosine diphosphate receptor inhibitor prior to left ventricular assist device implantation is not associated with increased bleeding. J Artif Organs 20, 42–49 (2017). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10047-016-0932-7

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10047-016-0932-7

Keywords

Navigation