Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

California's evolution toward integrated regional water management: a long-term view

  • Published:
Hydrogeology Journal Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Water resources sustainability hinges on interrelated physical, chemical, biological, and human processes, all of which may affect the quantity and quality of available water supplies. California's decades-long transition process from intensive and often unmanaged groundwater development toward more effective, sustainable integrated water resources management has resulted in important lessons. The process offers insights to other countries that seek to achieve sustainability. Long-term systematic groundwater and surface water monitoring programs and ongoing assessment of regional groundwater systems are an integral part of management. On local to global scales, the need for fundamental data, regional resources assessments, and increased support for scientific and technological advances is becoming increasingly apparent. The scientific community must enhance society's understanding of the essential links between basic data needs and the advancement and application of scientific approaches for effective water management. Correspondingly, scientific and political communities must coordinate common interests in endeavors toward sustainable management. Public outreach is a necessary complement to achieve sustainability goals and garner support for the programs needed to develop water policies based on sound science, manage water resources, and meet future water demands while avoiding unacceptable impacts.

Résumé

La durabilité des ressources en eau est à la charnière de processus physiques, chimiques, biologiques et humains, tous inter-reliés et à même d'affecter la quantité et la qualité de la disponibilité en eau d'alimentation. Les processus de transition décadaires en Californie, entre un développement intensif et non contrôlé des eaux souterraines, à un système plus rentable et durable de gestion intégrée des ressources en eau, a permis de conclure sur d'importantes leçons. Ce processus offre, en effet, des perspicacités à d'autres pays qui cherchent à concrétiser la durabilité. Les programmes systématiques de surveillance des eaux souterraines et de surface, sur le long terme, font parti intégrant de ce type de gestion. De l'échelle locale à l'échelle globale, la nécessité de données fondamentales, de bilans régionaux des ressources, et d'un support croissant aux avancées scientifiques et techniques, est devenu de plus en plus apparent. La communauté scientifique doit améliorer la compréhension de la société, en ce qui concerne les liens essentiels entre le besoin de données et l'avancement et l'application des approches scientifiques pour une gestion efficace de l'eau. De la même manière, les communautés scientifiques et politiques doivent coordonner leurs intérêts communs en se démenant pour une gestion durable. La mobilisation du publique est un complément nécessaire pour accomplir les objectifs de la durabilité, et rassembler le support aux besoins des programmes, de manière à développer des politiques de l'eau basées sur une science juste, à gérer les ressources en eau et satisfaire les futures demandes tout en évitant des impacts non acceptables.

Resumen

La sostenibilidad de los recursos hídricos gira sobre procesos interrelacionados físicos, químicos, biológicos y humanos, todos los cuales pueden afectar la cantidad y calidad de fuentes disponibles de agua. El proceso de transición de varias décadas que ha experimentado California, a partir de un desarrollo intensivo y frecuentemente carente de gestión de aguas subterráneas, hacia una gestión más efectiva, sostenible e integrada de recursos hídricos ha dado por resultado lecciones importantes. Este proceso ofrece alternativas para otros países que buscan alcanzar sostenibilidad. Los programas de monitoreo sistemático a largo plazo de agua superficial y agua subterránea, y las evaluaciones actuales de sistemas regionales de agua subterránea constituyen una parte integral de la gestión. Se hace cada vez más evidente, a escala global y local, la necesidad de datos básicos, evaluaciones regionales de recursos, y apoyo creciente para avances científicos y tecnológicos. La comunidad científica tiene que estimular el entendimiento de la sociedad de las relaciones fundamentales entre las necesidades de datos básicos y los avances y aplicación de enfoques científicos para un manejo efectivo del agua. Del mismo modo, las comunidades científicas y políticas tienen que coordinar intereses comunes en los esfuerzos hacia una gestión sostenible. El involucramiento del público es un complemento necesario para alcanzar los objetivos de sostenibilidad y obtener apoyo para los programas necesarios que permitan desarrollar políticas hídricas basadas en ciencia sana, gestión de recursos hídricos, y alcanzar las demandas futuras de agua mientras se evitan impactos inaceptables.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Alley WM, Healy RW, LaBaugh JW, Reilly TE (2002) Flow and storage in groundwater systems. Science 296(5575):1985–1990

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Alley WM, Leake SA (2004) The journey from safe yield to sustainability. Ground Water 42:12–16

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Alley WM, Reilly TE, Franke OL (1999) Sustainability of ground-water resources. USGS Circ 1186. http://water.usgs.gov/pubs/circ/circ1186/pdf/circ1186.pdf Cited 2 Aug 2005

  • Assembly Interim Committee on Water, California Legislature (1962) Groundwater problems in California. vol 26, Assembly Interim Committee Reports No. 4, California Legislature, Sacramento, CA

  • Belitz K, Dubrovsky NM, Burow K, Jurgens B, Johnson T (2003) Framework for a ground-water quality monitoring and assessment program for California. USGS Water Resources Investigations 03-4166. http://water.usgs.gov/pubs/wri/wri034166/pdf/wri034166.pdf Cited 2 Aug 2005

  • California Department of Water Resources (DWR) (1998) Water plan update. DWR Bulletin 160

  • California Department of Water Resources (DWR) (2003) California's groundwater. DWR Bulletin 118. http://www.dpla2.water.ca.gov/publications/groundwater/bulletin118/Bulletin118_Entire.pdf Cited 2 Aug 2005

  • California Department of Water Resources (DWR) (in press) California water plan, update 2005. DWR Bulletin 160, DWR, Sacramento, California

  • California Department of Water Resources and State Water Resources Control Board DWR and SWRCB (2004) Integrated regional water management grant program guidelines, Appendix A IRWM plan standards, DWR, Sacramento, California, pp 14–17

  • California Government Code (2005) Division 2: Subdivisions, Chapter 4: Requirements, Article 1: General (Sections 66473–66474.10), California Legislature, Sacramento, CA

  • California Water Code (2005) Division 6: Conservation, development, and utilization of state water resources. Part 2.6 (Sections 10610–10657), Part 2.75 (Sections 10750–10755.4), Part 2.78 (Sections 10795–10795.20) and Part 2.10 (Sections 10910–10915), California Legislature, Sacramento, CA

  • City of Los Angeles v. City of San Fernando (1975) 14 Cal.3d 199, 241

  • City of Los Angeles v. City of San Fernando (1975) 14 Cal.3d 199, 280, 537

  • City of Pasadena v. City of Alhambra (1949) 33 Cal.2d, 208, 926, 207

  • Custodio E (2002) Aquifer overexploitation: What does it mean? Hydrogeol J 10:254–277

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Custodio E, Kretsinger V, Llamas MR (2005) Intensive development of groundwater: concept, facts and suggestions. Water Policy 7:151–162

    Google Scholar 

  • deBuys W (2001) Seeing things whole: The essential John Wesley Powell, Island Press, Washington, DC

    Google Scholar 

  • Governor's Commission to Review California Water Rights Law (1978) Final report. Sacramento, CA

  • Hutson SS, Barber NL, Kenny JF, Linsey KS, Lumia DS, Maupin MA (2004) Estimated use of water in the United Sates in 2000. USGS Circ 1268. http://water.usgs.gov/pubs/circ/2004/circ1268/pdf/circular1268.pdf Cited 2 Aug 2005

  • Kazmann RG (1956) Safe yield in ground-water development, reality or illusion? J Irrig Drain Div 82(3):1–12

    Google Scholar 

  • Konikow LF, Kendy E (2005) Groundwater depletion: a global problem. Hydrogeol J 13:317–320

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kretsinger V, Cannon D, Utley K, Brower K (2004) Regional monitoring and data management: An essential foundation for integrated regional water management. Geological Society of America, Geoscience in a changing world: Annual meeting & exposition, Abstracts and Program, 2004 GSA Annual Meeting, November 2004, Denver, Colorado, 36: Paper 73-7

  • Kretsinger V, Narasimhan TN (2005) Sustaining groundwater resources: California's shift toward more effective groundwater management. Southwest Hydrol 4:18–19

    Google Scholar 

  • Leap D (1999) Geological occurrence of groundwater. In: Delleur J (ed) The handbook of groundwater engineering, vol 1. CRC, Boca Raton, FL, pp 1–52

  • Lee CH (1914) The determination of safe yield of underground reservoirs of the closed-basin type. Proc of the ASCE, Papers and Discussions, ASCE, Reston, VA, Vol XL, 4, pp 817–887

  • Llamas MR, Custodio E (2003) Intensive use of groundwater: A new situation which demands proactive action. In: Llamas R, Custodio E (ed) Intensive use of groundwater, challenges and opportunities, vol. 1. Balkema, Amsterdam, pp 13–31

    Google Scholar 

  • Luhdorff and Scalmanini, Consulting Engineers [LSCE] (2004) Groundwater monitoring program, data management system, and update of groundwater conditions in the Yolo County area. Yolo County Flood Control and Water Conservation District, Woodland, CA

  • Mann JF (1961) Factors affecting the safe yield of ground-water basins. J Irrig Drain Div 87(3):63–69

    Google Scholar 

  • Mendenhall WC (1908) Ground waters and irrigation enterprises in the foothill belt, Southern California. USGS Water-Supply Paper 219, USGS, Reston, VA

  • Narasimhan TN, Kretsinger V (2003) Developing, managing and sustaining California's groundwater resources. A White Paper for the Groundwater Resources Association of California. http://www.grac.org/CA_GW_Resources.pdf Cited 2 Aug 2005

  • National Science and Technology Council [NSTC], Committee on Environment and Natural Resources (2004) Science and technology to support fresh water availability in the United States. http://www.ostp.gov/NSTC/html/swaqreport_2-1-05.pdf Cited 2 Aug 2005

  • Orange County Water District [OCWD] (1993) Reflections on 60 years, OCWD 1993 annual report, OCWD, Fountain Valley, CA

  • Peters HJ (1982) Groundwater management in California. Proc ASCE Convention and Exposition, Preprint 82-035, ASCE, Reston, VA, 15 p

  • Powell JW (1878) Report on the lands of the arid regions of the United States, with a more detailed account of the lands of Utah. Forty-fifth Congress, Second session. HR Exec Doc 73, Library of Congress, Washington, DC

  • Rappleye HS (1933) Recent areal subsidence found in releveling. Engin News Rec 110:845

    Google Scholar 

  • Reimer (2005) Here today, gone tomorrow? NGWA initiatives on groundwater sustainability. Southwest Hydrol 4:22–23

    Google Scholar 

  • Reymers V, Hemmeter T (2001) Santa Clara Valley Water District groundwater management plan. Santa Clara Valley, CA

  • Reynolds JL (2000) Water resources development in Santa Clara Valley, California: Insights into the human-hydrologic relationship. MS dissertation, University of California at Berkeley, Berkeley, CA

  • Schneider AJ (1977) Groundwater rights in California, background and issues. Governor's Commission to Review California Water Rights Law, Staff Paper No. 2, Sacramento, CA

  • Sophocleous M (1997) Managing water resources systems: Why “safe yield” is not sustainable. Ground Water 35:561

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sophocleous M (1998) On the elusive concept of safe yield and the response of interconnected stream-aquifer systems to development. In: Sophocleous M (ed) Perspectives on sustainable development of water resources in Kansas, vol 2. Kansas Geol Surv Bull 239:61–85

  • State Water Resources Control Board (2003) A comprehensive groundwater quality monitoring program for California. Report to the Governor and Legislature, Sacramento, CA

  • State Water Rights Board (1962) Report of Referee. State Water Rights Board, Sacramento, CA

  • Taylor CJ, Alley WM (2001) Ground-water-level monitoring and the importance of long-term water-level data. USGS Circ 1217. http://water.usgs.gov/pubs/circ/circ1217/pdf/circ1217_final.pdf Cited 2 Aug 2005

  • Tibbetts FH, Kieffer SE (1921) Report to Santa Clara Valley Water Conservation Committee on Santa Clara Valley Water Conservation Project. Santa Clara Valley Water Conservation Committee, San Jose, CA

  • Thomas HE (1951) The conservation of ground water: a survey of the present ground-water situation in the United States, 1st edn. McGraw-Hill, New York

    Google Scholar 

  • Todd DK (1980) Groundwater hydrology, 2nd edn. Wiley, New York

    Google Scholar 

  • United States Geological Survey (2002) Concepts for national assessment of water availability and use. Report to Congress, USGS Circ 1223. http://water.usgs.gov/pubs/circ/circ1223/pdf/C1223.pdf Cited 2 Aug 2005

Download references

Acknowledgements

The authors wish to thank the reviewers, M. Ramon Llamas and Emilio Custodio, for their insightful comments and constructive suggestions that improved the final manuscript.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Vicki Kretsinger Grabert.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Kretsinger Grabert, V., Narasimhan, T.N. California's evolution toward integrated regional water management: a long-term view. Hydrogeol J 14, 407–423 (2006). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10040-005-0005-0

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10040-005-0005-0

Keywords

Navigation