Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

Planned ventral hernia following damage control laparotomy in trauma: an added year of recovery but equal long-term outcome

  • Original Article
  • Published:
Hernia Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Purpose

Significantly injured trauma patients commonly require damage control laparotomy (DCL). These patients undergo either primary fascial closure during the index hospitalization or are discharged with a planned ventral hernia. Hospital and long-term outcomes of these patients have not been extensively studied.

Methods

Patients who underwent DCL for trauma from 2003 to 2012 at a regional Level I trauma center were identified and a comparison was made between those who had primary fascial closure and planned ventral hernia.

Results

DCL was performed in 154 patients, 47 % of whom sustained penetrating injuries. The mean age and injury severity score (ISS) were 40 and 25, respectively. Hospital mortality was 19 %. Primary fascial closure was performed in 115 (75 %) of those undergoing DCL during the index hospitalization. Of these, 11 (9 %) had reopening of the fascia. Of the surviving patients, 22 (19 %) never had primary fascial closure and were discharged with a planned ventral hernia. Patients with primary fascial closure and those with planned ventral hernia were similar in age, gender, ISS, and mechanism. Those with planned ventral hernias underwent more subsequent laparotomies (3.0 vs 1.3, p < 0.001), and had more enteric fistulas (18.2 vs 4.3 %, p = 0.041) and intra-abdominal infections (46 vs 15 %, p = 0.007), and had a greater number of hospital days (38 vs 25, p = 0.007) during the index hospitalization. Sixteen (73 %) patients with a planned ventral hernia had definitive reconstruction (mean days = 266). Once definitive abdominal wall closure was achieved, the two groups achieved similar rates of return to work and usual activity (71 vs 70 %, p = NS).

Conclusions

Following DCL for trauma, patients with a planned ventral hernia have definitive reconstruction nearly 9 months after the initial injury. Once definitive abdominal wall closure has been achieved; patients with primary fascial closure and those with planned ventral hernia have similar rates of return to usual activity.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Fig. 1

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Rotondo MF, Schwab CW, McGonigal MD, Phillips GR 3rd, Fruchterman TM, Kauder DR et al (1993) ‘Damage control’: an approach for improved survival in exsanguinating penetrating abdominal injury. J Trauma 35(3):375–382 (discussion 82–83. Epub 1993/09/01)

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. Stone HH, Strom PR, Mullins RJ (1983) Management of the major coagulopathy with onset during laparotomy. Ann Surg 197(5):532–535 (Epub 1983/05/01)

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  3. Brenner M, Bochicchio G, Bochicchio K, Ilahi O, Rodriguez E, Henry S et al (2011) Long-term impact of damage control laparotomy: a prospective study. Arch Surg 146(4):395–399 (Epub 2010/12/22)

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Miller RS, Morris JA Jr, Diaz JJ Jr, Herring MB, May AK (2005) Complications after 344 damage-control open celiotomies. J Trauma 59(6):1365–1371 (discussion 71–74. Epub 2006/01/06)

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Fabian TC, Croce MA, Pritchard FE, Minard G, Hickerson WL, Howell RL et al (1994) Planned ventral hernia. Staged management for acute abdominal wall defects. Ann Surg 219(6):643–650 (discussion 51–53. Epub 1994/06/01)

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  6. Miller PR, Thompson JT, Faler BJ, Meredith JW, Chang MC (2002) Late fascial closure in lieu of ventral hernia: the next step in open abdomen management. J Trauma 53(5):843–849 (Epub 2002/11/19)

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Scott BG, Feanny MA, Hirshberg A (2005) Early definitive closure of the open abdomen: a quiet revolution. Scand J Surg 94(1):9–14 (Epub 2005/05/04)

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. Campbell A, Chang M, Fabian T, Franz M, Kaplan M, Moore F et al (2009) Management of the open abdomen: from initial operation to definitive closure. Am Surg 75(11 Suppl):S1–S22 (Epub 2009/12/17)

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Teixeira PG, Salim A, Inaba K, Brown C, Browder T, Margulies D et al (2008) A prospective look at the current state of open abdomens. Am Surg 74(10):891–897 (Epub 2008/10/24)

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. Howdieshell TR, Proctor CD, Sternberg E, Cue JI, Mondy JS, Hawkins ML (2004) Temporary abdominal closure followed by definitive abdominal wall reconstruction of the open abdomen. Am J Surg 188(3):301–306 (Epub 2004/09/29)

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. Hatch QM, Osterhout LM, Podbielski J, Kozar RA, Wade CE, Holcomb JB et al (2011) Impact of closure at the first take back: complication burden and potential overutilization of damage control laparotomy. J Trauma 71(6):1503–1511 (Epub 2011/12/21)

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. Barker DE, Kaufman HJ, Smith LA, Ciraulo DL, Richart CL, Burns RP (2000) Vacuum pack technique of temporary abdominal closure: a 7-year experience with 112 patients. J Trauma 48(2):201–206 (discussion 6–7. Epub 2000/03/04)

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. Garner GB, Ware DN, Cocanour CS, Duke JH, McKinley BA, Kozar RA et al (2001) Vacuum-assisted wound closure provides early fascial reapproximation in trauma patients with open abdomens. Am J Surg 182(6):630–638 (Epub 2002/02/13)

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  14. Miller PR, Meredith JW, Johnson JC, Chang MC (2004) Prospective evaluation of vacuum-assisted fascial closure after open abdomen: planned ventral hernia rate is substantially reduced. Ann Surg 239(5):608–614 (discussion 14–16. Epub 2004/04/15)

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  15. Brock WB, Barker DE, Burns RP (1995) Temporary closure of open abdominal wounds: the vacuum pack. Am Surg 61(1):30–35 (Epub 1995/01/01)

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  16. Hatch QM, Osterhout LM, Ashraf A, Podbielski J, Kozar RA, Wade CE et al (2011) Current use of damage-control laparotomy, closure rates, and predictors of early fascial closure at the first take-back. J Trauma 70(6):1429–1436 (Epub 2011/08/06)

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  17. Burlew CC, Moore EE, Biffl WL, Bensard DD, Johnson JL, Barnett CC (2012) One hundred percent fascial approximation can be achieved in the postinjury open abdomen with a sequential closure protocol. J Trauma Acute Care Surg 72(1):235–241 (Epub 2012/02/09)

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  18. Fischer PE, Fabian TC, Magnotti LJ, Schroeppel TJ, Bee TK, Maish GO 3rd et al (2009) A ten-year review of enterocutaneous fistulas after laparotomy for trauma. J Trauma 67(5):924–928 (Epub 2009/11/11)

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  19. DiCocco JM, Magnotti LJ, Emmett KP, Zarzaur BL, Croce MA, Sharpe JP et al (2010) Long-term follow-up of abdominal wall reconstruction after planned ventral hernia: a 15-year experience. J Am Coll Surg 210(5):686–695 (95–98. Epub 2010/04/28)

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  20. Cheatham ML, Safcsak K, Llerena LE, Morrow CE Jr, Block EF (2004) Long-term physical, mental, and functional consequences of abdominal decompression. J Trauma 56(2):237–241 (discussion 41–42. Epub 2004/02/13)

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Conflict of interest

BMZ declares no conflict of interest, KBK declares no conflict of interest, JJC declares no conflict of interest, JCH declares no conflict of interest, JAC declares no conflict of interest.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. MetroHealth Medical Center, Case Western Reserve University School of Medicine, 2500 MetroHealth Dr., Cleveland, OH, 44109, USA

    B. M. Zosa, J. J. Como, K. B. Kelly, J. C. He & J. A. Claridge

Authors
  1. B. M. Zosa
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. J. J. Como
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. K. B. Kelly
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  4. J. C. He
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  5. J. A. Claridge
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to J. J. Como.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Zosa, B.M., Como, J.J., Kelly, K.B. et al. Planned ventral hernia following damage control laparotomy in trauma: an added year of recovery but equal long-term outcome. Hernia 20, 231–238 (2016). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10029-015-1377-2

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10029-015-1377-2

Keywords

Search

Navigation