Skip to main content
Log in

Infected large pore meshes may be salvaged by topical negative pressure therapy

  • Original Article
  • Published:
Hernia Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Purpose

To evaluate the efficacy of negative pressure therapy for superficial and deep mesh infections after ventral and incisional hernia repair by a prospective monocentric observational study.

Methods

During a 6-year period, 724 consecutive open ventral and incisional hernia repairs were performed. Pre- and intraoperative data as well as postoperative complications were prospectively recorded. In case of wound infection, negative pressure therapy (NPT) was our primary treatment.

Results

Sixty-three patients (8.7 %) were treated using negative pressure therapy after primary ventral and incisional hernia repair. Infectious complications needing NPT occurred in 54 patients in the retromuscular group (54/523; 10.3 %), none when laparoscopically treated and in 9 patients (9/143; 6.3 %) treated by an open intraperitoneal mesh technique. Considering outcome, all meshes were completely salvaged in the retromuscular mesh group after a median of 5 dressing changes (range, 2–9), while in the intraperitoneal mesh, group 3 meshes needed complete (n = 2) or partial (n = 1) excision. Mean duration to complete wound closure was 44 days (range, 26–63 days).

Conclusion

NPT is a useful adjunct for salvage of deep infected meshes, particularly when large pore monofilament mesh is used.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Arvidsson D, Berndsen FH, Larsson LG, Leijonmarck CE, Rimback G, Rudberg C, Smedberg S, Spangen L, Montgomery A (2005) Randomized clinical trial comparing 5-year recurrence rate after laparoscopic versus Shouldice repair of primary inguinal hernia. Br J Surg 92:1085–1091

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  2. Luijendijk RW, Hop WC, van den Tol MP, de Lange DC, Braaksma MM, JN IJ, Boelhouwer RU, de Vries BC, Salu MK, Wereldsma JC, Bruijninckx CM, Jeekel J (2000) A comparison of suture repair with mesh repair for incisional hernia. N Engl J Med 343:392–398

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  3. Aufenacker TJ, Koelemay MJ, Gouma DJ, Simons MP (2006) Systematic review and meta-analysis of the effectiveness of antibiotic prophylaxis in prevention of wound infection after mesh repair of abdominal wall hernia. Br J Surg 93:5–10

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  4. Mangram AJ, Horan TC, Pearson ML, Silver LC, Jarvis WR (1999) Guideline for prevention of surgical site infection, 1999. Hospital Infection Control Practices Advisory Committee. Infect Control Hosp Epidemiol 20:250–278; quiz 279–280

  5. Cobb WS, Harris JB, Lokey JS, McGill ES, Klove KL (2003) Incisional herniorrhaphy with intraperitoneal composite mesh: a report of 95 cases. Am Surg 69:784–787

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Petersen S, Henke G, Freitag M, Faulhaber A, Ludwig K (2001) Deep prosthesis infection in incisional hernia repair: predictive factors and clinical outcome. Eur J Surg 167:453–457

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  7. Deysine M (1998) Pathophysiology, prevention, and management of prosthetic infections in hernia surgery. Surg Clin North Am 78:1105–1115, viii

    Google Scholar 

  8. Lal P, Kajla RK, Chander J, Saha R, Ramteke VK (2003) Randomized controlled study of laparoscopic total extraperitoneal versus open Lichtenstein inguinal hernia repair. Surg Endosc 17:850–856

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Neumayer L, Giobbie-Hurder A, Jonasson O, Fitzgibbons R Jr, Dunlop D, Gibbs J, Reda D, Henderson W (2004) Open mesh versus laparoscopic mesh repair of inguinal hernia. N Engl J Med 350:1819–1827

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  10. Szczerba SR, Dumanian GA (2003) Definitive surgical treatment of infected or exposed ventral hernia mesh. Ann Surg 237:437–441

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. Trunzo JA, Ponsky JL, Jin J, Williams CP, Rosen MJ (2009) A novel approach for salvaging infected prosthetic mesh after ventral hernia repair. Hernia 13:545–549

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  12. Paton BL, Novitsky YW, Zerey M, Sing RF, Kercher KW, Heniford BT (2007) Management of infections of polytetrafluoroethylene-based mesh. Surg Infect (Larchmt) 8:337–341

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. Ramirez OM, Ruas E, Dellon AL (1990) Components separation method for closure of abdominal wall defects: an anatomical and clinical study. Plast Reconstr Surg 86:519–526

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  14. White TJ, Santos MC, Thompson JS (1998) Factors affecting wound complications in repair of ventral hernias. Am Surg 64:276–280

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  15. Sugerman HJ, Kellum JM Jr, Reines HD, DeMaria EJ, Newsome HH, Lowry JW (1996) Greater risk of incisional hernia with morbidly obese than steroid-dependent patients and low recurrence with prefascial polypropylene mesh. Am J Surg 171:80–84

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  16. Stremitzer S, Bachleitner-Hofmann T, Gradl B, Gruenbeck M, Bachleitner-Hofmann B, Mittlboeck M, Bergmann M (2010) Mesh graft infection following abdominal hernia repair: risk factor evaluation and strategies of mesh graft preservation. A retrospective analysis of 476 operations. World J Surg 34:1702–1709

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  17. Kercher KW, Sing RF, Matthews BD, Heniford BT (2002) Successful salvage of infected PTFE mesh after ventral hernia repair. Ostomy Wound Manag 48(40–42):44–45

    Google Scholar 

  18. Heller L, Levin SL, Butler CE (2006) Management of abdominal wound dehiscence using vacuum assisted closure in patients with compromised healing. Am J Surg 191:165–172

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  19. Subramonia S, Pankhurst S, Rowlands BJ, Lobo DN (2009) Vacuum-assisted closure of postoperative abdominal wounds: a prospective study. World J Surg 33:931–937

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  20. Braakenburg A, Obdeijn MC, Feitz R, van Rooij IA, van Griethuysen AJ, Klinkenbijl JH (2006) The clinical efficacy and cost effectiveness of the vacuum-assisted closure technique in the management of acute and chronic wounds: a randomized controlled trial. Plast Reconstr Surg 118:390–397; discussion 398–400

    Google Scholar 

  21. Argenta LC, Morykwas MJ (1997) Vacuum-assisted closure: a new method for wound control and treatment: clinical experience. Ann Plast Surg 38:563–576; discussion 577

    Google Scholar 

  22. Borgquist O, Ingemansson R, Malmsjo M (2010) The effect of intermittent and variable negative pressure wound therapy on wound edge microvascular blood flow. Ostomy Wound Manag 56:60–67

    Google Scholar 

  23. Berrevoet F, D’hont F, Rogiers X, Troisi R, de Hemptinne B (2011) Open intraperitoneal versus retromuscular mesh repair for umbilical hernias less than 3 cm diameter. Am J Surg 201:85–90

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  24. Berrevoet F, Van den Bossche B, de Baerdemaeker L, de Hemptinne B (2010) Laparoscopic evaluation shows deficiencies in memory ring deployment during small ventral hernia repair. World J Surg 34:1710–1715

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  25. Bernard C, Polliand C, Mutelica L, Champault G (2007) Repair of giant incisional abdominal wall hernias using open intraperitoneal mesh. Hernia 11:315–320

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  26. Timmers MS, Graafland N, Bernards AT, Nelissen RG, van Dissel JT, Jukema GN (2009) Negative pressure wound treatment with polyvinyl alcohol foam and polyhexanide antiseptic solution instillation in posttraumatic osteomyelitis. Wound Repair Regen 17:278–286

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  27. Klinge U, Klosterhalfen B, Birkenhauer V, Junge K, Conze J, Schumpelick V (2002) Impact of polymer pore size on the interface scar formation in a rat model. J Surg Res 103:208–214

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  28. Klinge U, Junge K, Spellerberg B, Piroth C, Klosterhalfen B, Schumpelick V (2002) Do multifilament alloplastic meshes increase the infection rate? Analysis of the polymeric surface, the bacteria adherence, and the in vivo consequences in a rat model. J Biomed Mater Res 63:765–771

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  29. Leber GE, Garb JL, Alexander AI, Reed WP (1998) Long-term complications associated with prosthetic repair of incisional hernias. Arch Surg 133:378–382

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  30. Rosen MJ (2009) Polyester-based mesh for ventral hernia repair: is it safe? Am J Surg 197:353–359

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  31. Carbonell AM, Kercher KW, Sing RF, Heniford BT (2005) Susceptibility of prosthetic biomaterials to infection. Surg Endosc 19:1670

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  32. Stevens P (2009) Vacuum-assisted closure of laparostomy wounds: a critical review of the literature. Int Wound J 6:259–266

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgments

The authors would like to thank Chantal Tielemans for her dedication in treating these patients by NDT and for the daily practical assistance in times of trouble.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to F. Berrevoet.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Berrevoet, F., Vanlander, A., Sainz-Barriga, M. et al. Infected large pore meshes may be salvaged by topical negative pressure therapy. Hernia 17, 67–73 (2013). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10029-012-0969-3

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10029-012-0969-3

Keywords

Navigation