Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Low-cost mesh for inguinal hernia repair in resource-limited settings

  • Review
  • Published:
Hernia Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Introduction

Hernia repair is one of the most frequently performed surgical procedures worldwide, yet more than half of hernias may be untreated in African countries that lack adequate and affordable surgical care. Although this disease burden can be effectively reduced by surgical repair, public health efforts to promote repair have been sparse because of the presumed high cost of surgery.

Objective

To review the epidemiology and treatment of hernias in African countries and to assess the efficacy and safety of using low-cost mesh for repair in resource-limited settings.

Methods

An extensive literature search was performed using PubMed and the Cochrane Library to locate pertinent background information and studies that used low-cost alternatives to commercial mesh.

Results

Most hernia repairs in Africa are performed as high-risk emergency procedures. When treatment is provided, fewer than 5% are repaired using implanted mesh because of its high cost, despite the demonstrated improvement in clinical outcomes with tension-free repair. A total of four studies using low-cost mesh were reviewed. Three of the studies compared postoperative outcomes for repairs using sterile mosquito nets with those using commercial surgical mesh. The fourth study randomized patients to receive either an indigenous bilayer device or the Prolene Hernia System. No significant differences in recurrence or in incidence of wound complications between repairs using low-cost and commercial mesh were observed. The price of low-cost mesh was generally less than 1/1,000 the price of commercial mesh.

Conclusions

There were no significant differences in outcomes between repairs using low-cost and commercial mesh. While the size of the study populations and the limited time for follow-up preclude conclusive measures of effectiveness, recurrence, and long-term complications, these studies demonstrate that providing an improved standard of surgical care need not be prohibitively expensive.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Primatesta P, Goldacre MJ (1996) Inguinal hernia repair: incidence of elective and emergency surgery, readmission and mortality. Intl J Epidemiol 25:835–839

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  2. Rutkow IM (2003) Demographic and socioeconomic aspects of hernia repair in the United States in 2003. Surg Clin N Am 83:1045–1051

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. Rosemar A, Angeräs U, Rosengren A, Nordin P (2010) Effect of body mass index on groin hernia surgery. Ann Surg 252:397–401

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Annual Estimates of the Population for the United States, Regions and Divisions: April 1, 2000 to July 1, 2003. Population Division, US Census Bureau 2004

  5. Population Statistics, Statistics Sweden (2008) http://www.scb.se/Pages/PressRelease223452.aspx. Accessed 15 July 2010

  6. Lavy C, Tindall A, Steinlechner C et al (2007) Surgery in Malawi-a national survey of activity in rural and urban hospitals. Ann R Coll Surg Engl 89:722–724

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Ozgediz D, Galukande M, Mabweijano J et al (2008) The Neglect of the global surgical workforce: experience and evidence from Uganda. World J Surg 32:1208–1215

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. Wilhelm TJ, Anemana S, Kyamanywa P et al (2006) Anaesthesia for elective inguinal hernia repair in rural Ghana-appeal for local anaesthesia in resource-poor countries. Trop Doct 36:147–149

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  9. Kingsnorth AN, Clarke MG, Shillcutt SD et al (2009) Public health and policy issues of hernia surgery in Africa. World J Surg 33:1188–1193

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. The World Bank Group Data Reports (2008) http://ddp-ext.worldbank.org/ext/ddpreports. Accessed 15 July 2010

  11. World Population Data Sheet (2010) Population reference Bureau. http://www.prb.org/pdf10/10wpds_eng.pdf. Accessed 15 July 2010

  12. Shillcutt SD, Clarke MG, Kingsnorth AN (2010) Cost-effectiveness of groin hernia surgery in the western region of Ghana. Arch Surg 145:954–961

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. Debas HT, Gosselin R, McCord C, Thind A (2006) Chapter 67 Surgery. In: Disease control priorities in developing countries, 2nd edition. The World Bank and Oxford University Press, Washington, DC

  14. Weiser TG, Regenbogen SE, Thompson KD et al (2008) An estimation of the global volume of surgery: a modeling strategy based on available data. Lancet 372:139–144

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  15. Mock C, Cherian M, Juillard C et al (2010) Developing priorities for addressing surgical conditions globally: furthering the link between surgery and public health policy. World J Surg 34:381–385

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  16. Sanders DL, Porter CS, Mitchell KCD, Kingsnorth AN (2008) A prospective cohort study comparing the African and European hernia. Hernia 12:527–529

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  17. Ohene-Yeboah M, Abantanga F, Oppong J et al (2009) Some aspects of the epidemiology of external Hernias in Kumasi, Ghana. Hernia 13:529–532

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  18. Hair A, Paterson C, Wright D et al (2001) What effect does the duration of an inguinal hernia have on patient symptoms? J Am Coll Surg 193:125–129

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  19. Ohana G, Manevwitch I, Well R et al (2004) Inguinal hernia: challenging the traditional indication for surgery in asymptomatic patients. Hernia 8:117–120

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  20. O’Dwyer PJ, Norrie J, Alant A et al (2006) Observation or operation for patients with an asymptomatic inguinal hernia. Ann Surg 244:167–173

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  21. Fitzgibbons RJ, Giobbie-Hurder A, Gibbs JO et al (2006) Watchful waiting versus repair of inguinal hernia in minimally symptomatic men. JAMA 295:285–292

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  22. Cameron AEP (1994) Accuracy of clinical diagnosis of direct and indirect inguinal hernia. BJS 81:250

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  23. Leubner KD, Chop WM, Ewigman B, Loven B (2007) What is the risk of bowel strangulation in an adult with an untreated inguinal hernia? Family Phys Inq Net 56:1039–1041

    Google Scholar 

  24. Ohene-Yeboah M (2003) Strangulated external hernias in Kumasi. West Afr J Med 22:310–313

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  25. Odula P (2004) Groin hernia in Mulago Hospital, Kampala. East Central Afr J Surg 9:48–52

    Google Scholar 

  26. Elrashied M, Widatalla AH, Ahmed ME (2007) External strangulated hernia in Khartoum, Sudan. East Afr Med J 84:379–382

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  27. Kulah B, Duzgun AP, Moran M et al (2001) Emergency hernia repairs in elderly patients. Am J Surg 182:455–459

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  28. Kulah B, Kulacoglu IH, Oruc MT et al (2001) Presentation and outcome of incarcerated external hernias in adults. Am J Surg 181:101–104

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  29. Álvarez JA, Baldonedo RF, Bear IG et al (2004) Incarcerated groin hernias in adults: presentation and outcome. Hernia 8:121–126

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  30. Choo S, Perry H, Hesse AA, et al. (2010) Assessment of capacity for surgery, obstetrics and anaesthesia in 17 Ghanaian hospital using a WHO assessment tool. Trop Med Intl Health

  31. Prieto-Díaz-Chávez E et al (2009) A cost-effectiveness analysis of tension-free versus shouldice inguinal hernia repair: a randomized double-blind clinical trial. Hernia 13:233–238

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  32. Amato B, Moja L, Panico S, et al. (2009) Shouldice technique versus other open techniques for inguinal hernia repair. The Cochrane Library

  33. Scott N, Go PM, Graham P, et al. (2002) Open Mesh versus non-mesh for groin hernia repair-review. The Cochrane Library

  34. EU Hernia Trialists Collaboration (2000) Mesh compared with non-mesh methods of open groin hernia repair: systematic review of randomized trials. Br J Surg 87:854–859

    Article  Google Scholar 

  35. Beets GL, Oosterhuis KJ, Go PM et al (1997) Long term followup (12–15 years) of a randomized controlled trial comparing Bassini-Stetten, Shouldice, and high ligation with narrowing of the internal ring for primary inguinal hernia repair. J Am Coll Surg 185:352–357

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  36. Just E, et al. (2010) Reduction of the complication rate in Liechtenstein hernia repair. Intl J Surg 1–4

  37. Nicholson S (1999) Inguinal hernia repair. BJS 86:577–578

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  38. Sanders DL, Kingsnorth AN (2007) Operation hernia: humanitarian hernia repairs in Ghana. Hernia 11:389–391

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  39. Wilhelm TJ, Freudenberg S, Jonas E et al (2007) Sterilized mosquito net versus commercial mesh for hernia repair: an experimental study in goats in Mbarara/Uganda. Eur Surg Res 39:312–317

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  40. World Health Organization (WHO) Statistical information system. http://www.who.int.whosis/en. Accessed 15 July 2010

  41. Freudenberg S, Sano D, Ouangré E et al (2006) Commercial mesh versus nylon mosquito net for hernia repair. A randomized double-blind study in Burkina Faso. World J Surg 30:1784–1789

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  42. Clarke MG, Oppong C, Simmermacher R et al (2009) The use of sterilized polyester mosquito net mesh for inguinal hernia repair in Ghana. Hernia 13:155–159

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  43. Tongaonkar RR, Reddy BV, Mehta VK et al (2003) Preliminary multicentric trial of cheap indigenous mosquito-net cloth for tension-free hernia repair. Indian J Surg 65:89–95

    Google Scholar 

  44. Laxminarayan R, Mills AJ, Breman JG et al (2006) Advancement of global health: key messages from the disease control priorities project. Lancet 367:1193–1208

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  45. Chauhan A, Tiwari S, Gupta A (2007) Study of efficacy of bilayer mesh device versus conventional polypropylene hernia system in inguinal hernia repair: early results. World J Surg 31:1356–1359

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Conflict of interest

None.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to F. Abdullah.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Yang, J., Papandria, D., Rhee, D. et al. Low-cost mesh for inguinal hernia repair in resource-limited settings. Hernia 15, 485–489 (2011). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10029-011-0827-8

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10029-011-0827-8

Keywords

Navigation