Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Ecology of Compounding Disturbances: The Effects of Prescribed Burning After Clearcutting

  • Published:
Ecosystems Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Disturbance regimes in much of the boreal forest have shifted from wildfire to clearcutting over the last century, resulting in concerns for biodiversity. Because the boreal forest has evolved under a natural fire regimes, we hypothesized that application of prescribed burning (PB) after clearcutting would result in plant communities more similar to wildfire than clearcut only. However, because clearcutting + PB involves multiple disturbances in a short interval, we proposed an alternate hypothesis that clearcutting + PB would result in a species composition and trait assemblage that differ from those that develop after a single wildfire or clearcutting event. We determined species composition, diversity, and trait composition of 17 clearcut, 17 clearcut + PB, and 15 wildfire sites of jack pine (Pinus banksiana) dominated forests in northwestern Ontario, Canada 15–37 years after disturbance. Contrary to our primary hypothesis we found that clearcut + PB formed communities different from wildfire and clearcut, the latter two being similar. Clearcut + PB harbored more early successional species associated with seed banking, wind dispersal, deciduous foliage, and alien origin than wildfire or clearcut sites, which showed no specific trait associations. Taxonomic and trait analysis of clearcut + PB sites exhibited effects of compound disturbances, as observed after short-interval fires, supporting our alternate hypothesis. We concluded that PB after clearcutting formed plant communities significantly different from those developed either after clearcutting or wildfire alone. We attribute this community divergence to the compounding effects associated with the addition of prescribed fire to these previously disturbed forests.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Figure 1
Figure 2
Figure 3

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Abrams MD, Dickman D. 1982. Early revegetation of clear-cut and burned jack pine sites in northern lower Michigan. Can J Bot 60:946–54.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Allen HD. 2008. Fire: plant functional types and patch mosaic burning in fire-prone ecosystems. Prog Phys Geogr 32:421–37.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bell WF, Newmaster SG. 2002. The effects of silvicultural disturbances on the diversity of seed-producing plants in the boreal mixedwood forest. Can J For Res 32:1180–91.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bradshaw CJA, Warkentin IG, Sodhi NS. 2009. Urgent preservation of boreal carbon stocks and biodiversity. Trends Ecol Evol 24:541–8.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Dolédec S, Chessel D, Ter Braak CJF, Champely S. 1996. Matching species traits to environmental variables: a new three-table ordination method. Environ Ecol Stat 3:143–66.

    Google Scholar 

  • Donato DC, Fontaine JB, Robinson WD, Kauffman JB, Law BE. 2009. Vegetation response to a short interval between high-severity wildfires in a mixed-evergreen forest. J Ecol 97:142–57.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dray S, Legendre P. 2008. Testing the species traits–environment relationships: the fourth-corner problem revisited. Ecology 89:3400–12.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Dray S, Dufour AB, Chessel D. 2007. The ade4 package-II: Two-table and K-table methods. R News 7:47–52.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dufrene M, Legendre P. 1997. Species assemblages and indicator species: the need for a flexible asymmetrical approach. Ecol Monogr 67:345–66.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Environment Canada. 2009. Canadian Climate Normals 1971–2000. [Online]. http://www.climate.weatheroffice.ec.gc.ca/climate_normals/index_e.html. Accessed 20 July 2009.

  • Flora of Ontario 2005. Integrated Botanical Information System (FOIBIS), Phase 1. Entire Flora. http://www.uoguelph.ca/foibis/.

  • Fraterrigo JM, Turner MG, Pearson SM. 2006. Interactions between past land use, life-history traits and understorey spatial heterogeneity. Landscape Ecol 21:777–90.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Frelich LE, Reich PB. 1999. Neighborhood effects, disturbance severity, and community stability in forests. Ecosystems 2:151–66.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Halpern CB. 1989. Early successional pathways and the resistance and resilience of forest communities. Ecology 69:1703–15.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Haussler S, Bergeron Y. 2004. Range of variability in boreal aspen plant communities after wildfire and clearcutting. Can J For Res 34:274–88.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Holm S. 1979. A simple sequentially rejective multiple test procedure. Scand J Stat 6:65–70.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ilisson T, Chen YH. 2009. Response of six boreal tree species to stand replacing fire and clearcutting. Ecosystems 12:820–9.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Johnstone JF. 2006. Response of boreal plant communities to variations in previous fire-free interval. Int J Wildland Fire 15:497–508.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kemball KJ, Wang GG, Westwood AR. 2006. Are mineral soils exposed by severe wildfire better seedbeds for conifer regeneration? Can J For Res 36:1943–50.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Laliberté E. 2009. FD: measuring functional diversity from multiple traits. R package version 1.0-0.

  • Lamb EG, Mallik AU, Mackereth R. 2003. Impact of adjacent clearcutting and forest fire in riparian zone vegetation in northwestern Ontario. For Ecol Manage 177:529–38.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lavorel S, Garnier E. 2002. Predicting changes in community composition and ecosystem functioning from plant traits: revisiting the Holy Grail. Funct Ecol 16:545–56.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lavorel S, McIntyre S, Landsberg J, Forbes TDA. 1997. Plant functional classifications: from general groups to specific groups based on response to disturbance. TREE 12:474–8.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Mallik AU, Gimingham CH. 1985. Ecological effects of heather burning II. Effects on seed germination and vegetative regeneration. J Ecol 73:633–44.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • McCune B, Grace JB. 2002. Analysis of ecological communities. Oregon: MjM Software.

    Google Scholar 

  • McCune B, Mefford MJ. 2006. PC-ORD, Multivariate analysis of ecological data. Version 5.10 MjM Software, Oregon, 304 pp.

  • McIntyre S, Lavorel S, Tremont RM. 1995. Plant life-history attributes: their relationship to disturbance response in herbaceous vegetation. J Ecol 83:31–44.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Natural Heritage Information Centre (NHIC). 2008. List of Ontario Species. [Online]. http://nhic.mnr.gov.on.ca/MNR/nhic/species/species_list_old.cfm. Accessed 7 Dec 2009.

  • Nguyen-Xuan T, Bergeron Y, Simard D, Fyles JW, Pare D. 2000. The importance of forest floor disturbance in the early regeneration patterns of the boreal forest of western and central Quebec: a wildfire versus logging comparison. Can J For Res 30:1353–64.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Noble IR, Slatyer RO. 1980. The use of vital attributes to predict successional changes in plant communities subject to recurrent disturbances. Vegetatio 43:5–21.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Paine RT, Tegner MJ, Johnson EA. 1998. Compounded perturbations yield ecological surprises. Ecosystems 1:535–45.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pausas JG, Bradstock RA, Keith DA, Keeley JE, The GCTE (Global Change of Terrestrial Ecosystems) Fire Network. 2004. Plant functional traits in relation to fire in crown-fire ecosystems. Ecology 85:1085–100.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • R Development Core Team. 2009. R: A language and environment for statistical computing. R Foundation for Statistical Computing, Vienna, Austria. ISBN 3-900051-07-0, http://www.R-project.org.

  • Redburn MJ, Strong WL. 2008. Successional development of silviculturally treated and untreated high-latitude Populus tremuloides clearcuts in northern Alberta, Canada. For Ecol Manage 255:2937–49.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rees DC, Juday GP. 2002. Plant species diversity on logged versus burned sites in central Alaska. For Ecol Manage 155:291–302.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Reich PB, Bakken P, Carlson D, Frelich LE, Friedman SK, Grigal DF. 2001. Influence of logging, fire, and forest type on biodiversity and productivity in southern boreal forests. Ecology 82:2731–48.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Roberts MR. 2004. Response of the herbaceous layer to natural disturbance in North American forests. Can J Bot 82:1273–83.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rowe S. 1983. Concepts of fire effects on plant individuals and species. In: Wein RW, MacLean DA, Eds. The role of fire in northern circumpolar boreal ecosystems. Paris: SCOPE 18. p 135–51.

    Google Scholar 

  • Schoennagel T, Waller DM, Turner MG, Romme WH. 2004. The effect of fire interval on post-fire understorey communities in Yellowstone National Park. J Veg Sci 15:797–806.

    Google Scholar 

  • Siegwart-Collier SC, Mallik AU. 2010. Does post-fire abiotic habitat filtering create divergent plant communities in black spruce forests of eastern Canada? Oecologia 164:465–77. doi:10.1007/s00442-010-1642-0.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Smirnova E, Bergeron Y, Brais S. 2008. Influence of fire intensity on structure and composition of jack pine stands in the boreal forest of Quebec: live trees, understorey vegetation and dead wood dynamics. For Ecol Manage 255:2916–27.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sousa WP. 1984. The role of disturbance in natural communities. Ann Rev Ecol Syst 15:353–91.

    Google Scholar 

  • Spectrum Technologies Inc. 2008. IQ 150 pH Meter. Illinois, USA.

  • Thiffault E, Bélanger N, Paré D, Munson A. 2007. How do forest harvesting methods compare with wildfire? A case study of soil chemistry and tree nutrition in the boreal forest. Can J For Res 37:1658–68.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Wang GG, Kemball KJ. 2005. Effects of fire severity on early development of understorey vegetation. Can J For Res 35:254–62.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Weiher E, van der Werf A, Thompson K, Roderick M, Garnier E, Eriksson O. 1999. Challenging Theophrastus: a common core list of plant traits for functional ecology. J Veg Sci 10:609–20.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Whittle CA, Duchesne LC, Needham T. 1997. The impact of broadcast burning and fire severity on species composition and abundance of surface vegetation in a jack pine (Pinus banksiana) clear-cut. For Ecol Manage 94:141–8.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgments

This study was funded by the Forest Ecosystem Science Cooperative and the National Science and Research Council of Canada. Technical Support was provided by the Northwest Science and Technology Branch of the Ontario Ministry of Natural Resources. We thank Dr. Greg Pyle and Dr. Brian McLaren as well as two anonymous reviewers for their valuable comments on the manuscript.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Azim U. Mallik.

Additional information

Author Contributions

Keri Pidgen conceived of and designed the study, performed research, analyzed data and wrote the paper first draft. Azim U. Mallik conceived of and designed the study, contributed methods, guided the research and revised the paper.

Electronic supplementary material

Below is the link to the electronic supplementary material.

Supplementary material 1 (DOCX 60 kb)

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Pidgen, K., Mallik, A.U. Ecology of Compounding Disturbances: The Effects of Prescribed Burning After Clearcutting. Ecosystems 16, 170–181 (2013). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10021-012-9607-2

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10021-012-9607-2

Keywords

Navigation