Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

The Role of Surface and Subsurface Processes in Keeping Pace with Sea Level Rise in Intertidal Wetlands of Moreton Bay, Queensland, Australia

  • Published:
Ecosystems Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Increases in the elevation of the soil surfaces of mangroves and salt marshes are key to the maintenance of these habitats with accelerating sea level rise. Understanding the processes that give rise to increases in soil surface elevation provides science for management of landscapes for sustainable coastal wetlands. Here, we tested whether the soil surface elevation of mangroves and salt marshes in Moreton Bay is keeping up with local rates of sea level rise (2.358 mm y−1) and whether accretion on the soil surface was the most important process for keeping up with sea level rise. We found variability in surface elevation gains, with sandy areas in the eastern bay having the highest surface elevation gains in both mangrove and salt marsh (5.9 and 1.9 mm y−1) whereas in the muddier western bay rates of surface elevation gain were lower (1.4 and −0.3 mm y−1 in mangrove and salt marsh, respectively). Both sides of the bay had similar rates of surface accretion (~7–9 mm y−1 in the mangrove and 1–3 mm y−1 in the salt marsh), but mangrove soils in the western bay were subsiding at a rate of approximately 8 mm y−1, possibly due to compaction of organic sediments. Over the study surface elevation increments were sensitive to position in the intertidal zone (higher when lower in the intertidal) and also to variation in mean sea level (higher at high sea level). Although surface accretion was the most important process for keeping up with sea level rise in the eastern bay, subsidence largely negated gains made through surface accretion in the western bay indicating a high vulnerability to sea level rise in these forests.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Figure 1
Figure 2
Figure 3
Figure 4
Figure 5
Figure 6
Figure 7
Figure 8

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Adame MF, Neil D, Wright SF, Lovelock CE. 2010. Sedimentation within and among mangrove forests along a gradient of geomorphological settings. Estuar Coast Shelf Sci 86:21–30.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cahoon DR, Reed DJ, Day JW. 1995. Estimating shallow subsidence in microtidal salt marshes of the southeastern United States: Kaye and Barghoorn revisited. Mar Geol 128:1–9.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cahoon DR, Day JW, Reed DJ. 1999. The influence of surface and shallow subsurface soil processes on wetland elevation: a synthesis. Curr Top Wetl Biogeochem 3:72–88.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cahoon DR, Lynch JC, Hensel P, Boumans R, Perez BC, Segura B, Day JW. 2002a. High-precision measurements of wetland sediment elevation: I recent improvements to the sedimentation-erosion table. J Sediment Res 72:730–3.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cahoon DR, Lynch JC, Perez BC, Segura B, Holland RD, Stelly C, Stephenson G, Hensel P. 2002b. High-precision measurements of wetland sediment elevation: II the rod surface elevation table. J Sed Res 72:730–3.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cahoon DR, Hensel P, Rybczyk J, McKee KL, Proffitt ED, Perez BC. 2003. Mass tree mortality leads to mangrove peat collapse at Bay islands, Honduras after Hurricane Mitch. J Ecol 91:1093–105.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cahoon DR, Hensel P, Spencer T, Reed DJ, McKee KL, Saintilan N. 2006. Coastal wetland vulnerability to relative sea-level rise: wetland elevation trends and process controls. In: Verhoeven JTA, Beltman B, Bobbink R, Whigham DF, Eds. Wetlands and Natural Resource Management, Ecological Studies, Vol. 190. Berlin, Heidelberg: Springer. p 271–92.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Church JA, Gregory JM, Huybrechts P, Kuhn M, Lambeck K, Nhuan MT, Qin D, Woodworth PL. 2001. Changes in sea level. In: Houghton JT et al., Eds. Climate Change 2001: The Scientific Basis. Contribution of Working Group 1 to the Third Assessment Report of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. p 639–94.

    Google Scholar 

  • Costanza R, d’Arge R, de Groot R, Farber S, Grasso M, Hannon B, Naeem S, Limburg K, Paruelo J, O’Neill RV, Raskin R, Sutton P, van den Belt M. 1997. The value of the world’s ecosystem services and natural capital. Nature 387:253–60.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • D’Alpaos A, Lanzoni S, Marani M, Rinaldo A. 2007. Landscape evolution in tidal embayments: modeling the interplay of erosion, sedimentation, and vegetation dynamics. J Geophys Res 112:F01008. doi:10.1029/2006JF000537.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Day JW, Christian RR, Boesch DM, Yáñez-Arancibia A, Morris J, Twilley RR, Naylor L, Schaffner L, Stevenson C. 2008. Consequences of climate change on the ecogeomorphology of coastal wetlands. Estuar Coasts 31:477–91.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dennison WC, Abal EG. 1999. Moreton Bay Study. A scientific basis for the Healthy Waterways Campaign. Brisbane: SE Queensland Regional Water Quality Management Strategy, Brisbane City Council. 245 pp

    Google Scholar 

  • English S, Wilkenson C, Baker V. 1997. Survey manual for tropical marine resources. Townsville: Australian Institute of Marine Science.

    Google Scholar 

  • Eslami-Andargoli L, Dale P, Sipe N, Chaseling J. 2009. Mangrove expansion and rainfall patterns in Moreton Bay, Southeast Queensland Australia. Estuar Coast Shelf Sci 85:292–8.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ewel KC, Twilley RR, Ong JE. 1998. Different kinds of mangrove forests provide different goods and services. Glob Ecol Biogeogr Lett 7:83–94.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Eyre BD, France L. 1997. Importance of marine inputs to the sediment and nutrient load of coastal-plain estuaries: a case study of Pumicestone Passage, south-eastern Queensland, Australia. Mar Freshw Res 48:277–86.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • French JR, Stoddart DR. 1992. Hydrodynamics of salt-marsh creek systems—implications for marsh morphological development and material exchange. Earth Surf Proc Land 17:235–52.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Furukawa K, Wolanski E. 1996. Sedimentation in mangrove forests. Mangroves Salt Marshes 1:3–10.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gilman EL, Ellison J, Duke NC, Field C. 2008. Threats to mangroves from climate change and adaptation options: a review. Aquat Bot 89:237–50.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hughes L. 2003. Climate change and Australia: trends, projections and impacts. Austral Ecol 28:423–43.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kirwan ML, Murray AB. 2007. A coupled geomorphic and ecological model of tidal marsh evolution. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 104:6118–22.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Kirwan ML, Murray AB. 2008. Ecological and morphological response of brackish tidal marshland to the next century of sea-level rise: Western Island, British Columbia. Global Planet Change 60:471–86.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Knight JM, Dale PER, Spencer J, Griffin L. 2009. Exploring LiDAR data for mapping the micro-topography and tidal hydro-dynamics of mangrove systems: an example from southeast Queensland, Australia. Estuar Coast Shelf Sci 85:593–600.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Knott JF, Nuttle WF, Hemond HF. 1987. Hydrological parameters of salt marsh peat. Hydrol Process 1:211–20.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Komiyama A, Ong JE, Poungparn S. 2008. Allometry, biomass, and productivity of mangrove forests: a review. Aquat Bot 89:128–37.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Krauss KW, Allen JA, Cahoon DR. 2003. Differential rates of vertical accretion and elevation change among aerial roots types in Micronesian mangrove forests. Estuar Coast Shelf Sci 56:251–9.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Krauss KW, Doyle TW, Twilley RR, Rivera-Monroy VH, Sullivan JK. 2006. Evaluating the relative contributions of hydroperiod and soil fertility on growth of south Florida mangroves. Hydrobiologia 569:311–24.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Krauss KW, Keeland BD, Allen JA, Ewel KC, Johnson DJ. 2007. Biotropica Effects of season, rainfall, and hydrogeomorphic setting on mangrove tree growth in Micronesia. Biotropica 39:161–70.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Krauss KW, Cahoon DR, Allen JA, Ewel KC, Lynch JC, Cormier N. 2010. Surface elevation change and susceptibility of different mangrove zones to sea-level rise on Pacific high islands of Micronesia. Ecosystems 13:129–43.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lovelock CE, Ellison J. 2007. Vulnerability of mangroves and tidal wetlands of the Great Barrier Reef to climate change. In: Johnson J, Marshall P, Eds. Assessing the vulnerability of the GBR to climate change. Townsville: Great Barrier Reef Marine Park Authority.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lovelock CE, Ball MC, Martin KC, Feller IC. 2009. Nutrient enrichment increases mortality of mangroves. PloS ONE 4(5):e5600. doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0005600.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Lybolt M, Neil D, Zhao JX, Feng YX, Yu KF, Pandolfi J. 2010. Instability in a marginal coral reef: the shift from natural variability to a human-dominated seascape. Front Ecol Environ. doi:10.1890/090176.

  • McKee KL. 1993. Soil physicochemical patterns and mangrove species distribution—reciprocal effects? J Ecol 81:477–87.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • McKee KL. 2010 Biophysical controls on accretion and elevation change in Caribbean mangrove ecosystems. Estuar Coast Shelf Sci. doi:10.1016/j.ecss.2010.05.001.

  • McKee KL, Cahoon DR, Feller IC. 2007. Caribbean mangroves adjust to rising sea level through biotic controls on change in soil elevation. Glob Ecol Biogeogr 16:545–56.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Menezes M, Berger U, Worbes M. 2003. Annual growth rings and long-term growth patterns of mangrove trees from the Braganca Peninsula, North Brazil. Wetl Ecol Manag 11:233–42.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Meynecke O-J, Lee SY, Duke NC. 2008. Linking spatial metrics and fish catch reveals the importance of coastal wetland connectivity to inshore fisheries in Queensland, Australia. Biol Conserv 141:981–96.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Middleton BA, McKee KL. 2001. Degradation of mangrove tissues and implications for peat formation in Belizean island forests. J Ecol 89:818–28.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Reef R, Feller IC, Lovelock CE. 2010. Nutrition of mangroves. Tree Physiol 30:1148–60.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Rogers K, Saintilan N. 2008. Relationships between surface elevation and groundwater in mangrove forests of SE Australia. J Coastal Res 24:63–9.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rogers K, Saintilan N, Cahoon DR. 2005a. Surface elevation dynamics in a regenerating mangrove forest at Homebush Bay, Australia. Wetl Ecol Manag 13:587–98.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rogers K, Saintilan N, Heijnis H. 2005b. Mangrove encroachment of salt marsh in Western Port Bay, Victoria: the role of sedimentation, subsidence, and sea-level rise. Estuaries 28:551–9.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Saintilan N, Williams RJ. 1999. Mangrove transgression into saltmarsh environments in south-east Australia. Glob Ecol Biogeogr 8:124–77.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Spearitt P. 2009. The 200 km city: Brisbane, the Gold Coast and Sunshine Coast. Aust Econ Hist Rev 49:87–106.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Syvitski JPM, Kettner AJ, Overeem I, Hutton EWH, Hannon MT, Brakenridge GR, Day J, Vörösmarty C, Saito Y, Giosan L, Nicholls RJ. 2009. Sinking deltas due to human activities. Nat Geosci 2:681–6.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Van Asselen S, Stouthamer E, Smith ND. 2010. Factors controlling peat compaction in alluvial floodplains: a case study in the cold-temperate Cumberland Marshes, Canada. J Sed Res 80:155–66.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Whelan KRT. 2005. The successional dynamics of lightning initiated canopy gaps in the mangrove forests of Shark River, Everglades National Park, USA. Ph.D. dissertation. Miami (FL): Florida International University.

  • Whelan KRT, Smith TJIII, Cahoon DR, Lynch JC, Anderson GH. 2005. Groundwater control of mangrove surface elevation: Shrink and swell varies with soil depth. Estuaries 28:833–43.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Woodroffe CD. 1995. Response of tide-dominated mangrove shorelines in northern Australia to anticipated sea-level rise. Earth Surf Proc Land 20:65–85.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • You ZJ. 2005. Fine sediment resuspension dynamics in a large semi-enclosed bay. Ocean Eng 32:1982–93.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

This project is part of the South East Queensland Climate Adaptation Research Initiative (SEQ CARI). We thank Aldrie Amir and Jock McKenzie for their assistance with installing the RSETs. We also thank Nadia Santini, Fernanda Adame, Ruth Reef, Karin Perhans, Kim Millers and Helen Penrose for assistance with measurements over the study. We thank the Moreton Bay Research Station staff for their assistance with accessing site on North Stradbroke Island. We thank the Brisbane City Council for permitting use of the Tinchi Tamba Reserve and Boondall Wetlands for the study and for their assistance in obtaining site access. This research was done under permit QS2007/CVL1330 for the Moreton Bay Marine Park.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Catherine E. Lovelock.

Additional information

Author contributions

CEL and DRC designed the study. CEL, DRC, VB and AG performed the research. CEL analysed the data. CEL wrote the paper with assistance from all authors.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Lovelock, C.E., Bennion, V., Grinham, A. et al. The Role of Surface and Subsurface Processes in Keeping Pace with Sea Level Rise in Intertidal Wetlands of Moreton Bay, Queensland, Australia. Ecosystems 14, 745–757 (2011). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10021-011-9443-9

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10021-011-9443-9

Keywords

Navigation