August 2010, Volume 13, Issue 5, pp 712-726,
Open Access This content is freely available online to anyone, anywhere at any time.
Date: 25 Jun 2010
Field Simulation of Global Change: Transplanting Northern Bog Mesocosms Southward
A large proportion of northern peatlands consists of Sphagnum-dominated ombrotrophic bogs. In these bogs, peat mosses (Sphagnum) and vascular plants occur in an apparent stable equilibrium, thereby sustaining the carbon sink function of the bog ecosystem. How global warming and increased nitrogen (N) deposition will affect the species composition in bog vegetation is still unclear. We performed a transplantation experiment in which mesocosms with intact vegetation were transplanted southward from north Sweden to north-east Germany along a transect of four bog sites, in which both temperature and N deposition increased. In addition, we monitored undisturbed vegetation in control plots at the four sites of the latitudinal gradient. Four growing seasons after transplantation, ericaceous dwarf shrubs had become much more abundant when transplanted to the warmest site which also had highest N deposition. As a result ericoid aboveground biomass in the transplanted mesocosms increased most at the southernmost site, this site also had highest ericoid biomass in the undisturbed vegetation. The two dominant Sphagnum species showed opposing responses when transplanted southward; Sphagnum balticum height increment decreased, whereas S. fuscum height increment increased when transplanted southward. Sphagnum production did not differ significantly among the transplanted mesocosms, but was lowest in the southernmost control plots. The dwarf shrub expansion and increased N concentrations in plant tissues we observed, point in the direction of a positive feedback toward vascular plant-dominance suppressing peat-forming Sphagnum in the long term. However, our data also indicate that precipitation and phosphorus availability influence the competitive balance between Sphagnum, dwarf shrubs and graminoids.
Angela Breeuwer designed the study, performed research, analyzed data, and wrote the article. Monique M. P. D. Heijmans designed the study, performed research, analyzed data and wrote the article. Bjorn J. M. Robroek performed research and contributed in the writing stage. Frank Berendse designed the study and contributed new methods.
Backeus II. 1985. Aboveground production and growth dynamics of vascular bog plants in central Sweden. Acta Phytogr Suecica 74:1–98.
Berendse F. 1994. Competition between plant populations at low and high nutrient supplies. Oikos 71:253–60.CrossRef
Berendse F, Breemen Nv, Rydin H, Buttler A, Heijmans MMPD, Hoosbeek MR, Lee JA, Mitchell E, Saarinen T, Vasander H, Wallen B. 2001. Raised atmospheric CO2 levels and increased N deposition cause shifts in plant species composition and production in Sphagnum bogs. Global Change Biol 7:591–8.CrossRef
Bouwman A, Van Vuuren D, Derwent R, Posch M. 2002. A global analysis of acidification and eutrophication of terrestrial ecosystems. Water Air Soil Pollut 141:349–82.CrossRef
Bragazza L. 2008. A climatic threshold triggers the die-off of peat mosses during an extreme heat wave. Global Change Biol 14:2688–95.
Bragazza L, Siffi C, Iacumin P, Gerdol R. 2007. Mass loss and nutrient release during litter decay in peatland: the role of microbial adaptability to litter chemistry. Soil Biol Biochem 39:257–67.CrossRef
Breeuwer A, Heijmans MMPD, Gleichman M, Robroek BJM, Berendse F. 2009a. Response of Sphagnum species mixtures to increased temperature and nitrogen availability. Plant Ecol 204:97–111.CrossRef
Breeuwer A, Heijmans MMPD, Robroek BJM, Limpens J, Berendse F. 2008b. The effect of increased temperature and nitrogen deposition on decomposition in bogs. Oikos 117:1258–68.CrossRef
Breeuwer A, Robroek BJM, Limpens J, Heijmans MMPD, Schouten MGC, Berendse F. 2009b. Decreased summer water table depth affects peatland vegetation. Basic Appl Ecol 10:330–9.CrossRef
Bret-Harte MS, Garci EA, Sacre VM, Whorley JR, Wagner JL, Lipper SC, Chapin FSIII. 2004. Plant and soil responses to neighbour removal and fertilization in Alaskan tussock tundra. J Ecol 92:635–47.CrossRef
Bubier JL, Moore TR, Bledzki LA. 2007. Effects of nutrient addition on vegetation and carbon cycling in an ombrotrophic bog. Global Change Biol 13:1168–86.CrossRef
Chapin FSIII, Shaver GR, Giblin AE, Nadelhoffer KJ, Laundre JA. 1995. Responses of arctic tundra to experimental and observed changes in climate. Ecology 76:694–711.CrossRef
Clymo RS. 1970. The growth of Sphagnum: methods of measurement. J Ecol 58:13–49.CrossRef
Clymo RS, Hayward PM. 1982. The ecology of Sphagnum. In: Smith AJE, Ed. Bryophyte ecology. London: Chapman and Hall. p 229–89.
Coulson JC, Butterfield J. 1978. An investigation of the biotic factors determining the rates of plant decomposition on blanket bog. J Ecol 66:631–50.CrossRef
Daniels RE, Eddy A. 1985. Handbook of European Sphagna. London: HMSO.
Dorrepaal E, Aerts R, Cornelissen JHC, Logtestijn RSPv, Callaghan TV. 2006. Sphagnum modifies climate-change impacts on subarctic vascular bog plants. Funct Ecol 20:31–41.CrossRef
Dorrepaal E, Cornelissen JHC, Aerts R, Wallen B, Logtestijn RSPv. 2005. Are growth forms consistent predictors of leaf litter quality and decomposability across peatlands along a latitudinal gradient? J Ecol 93:817–28.CrossRef
Gerdol R, Petraglia A, Bragazza L, Iacumin P, Brancaleoni L. 2007. Nitrogen deposition interacts with climate in affecting production and decomposition rates in Sphagnum mosses. Global Change Biol 13:1810–21.CrossRef
Gunnarsson U. 2005. Global patterns of Sphagnum productivity. J Bryol 27:269–79.CrossRef
Gunnarsson U, Flodin L-Å. 2007. Vegetation shifts towards wetter site conditions on oceanic ombrotrophic bogs in southwestern Sweden. J Veget Sci 18:595–604.CrossRef
Gunnarsson U, Granberg G, Nilsson M. 2004. Growth, production and interspecific competition in Sphagnum: effects of temperature, nitrogen and sulphur treatments on a boreal mire. New Phytol 163:349–59.CrossRef
Gunnarsson U, Rydin H. 2000. Nitrogen fertilization reduces Sphagnum production in bog communities. New Phytol 147:527–37.CrossRef
Hayward PM, Clymo RS. 1983. The growth of Sphagnum: experiments on, and simulation of, some effects of light flux and water-table depth. J Ecol 71:845–63.CrossRef
Heijmans MMPD, Arp WJ, Berendse F. 2001a. Effects of elevated CO2 and vascular plants on evapotranspiration in bog vegetation. Global Change Biol 7:817–27.CrossRef
Heijmans MMPD, Berendse F, Arp WJ, Masselink AK, Klees H, Visser Wd, Breemen Nv. 2001b. Effects of elevated carbon dioxide and increased nitrogen deposition on bog vegetation in the Netherlands. J Ecol 89:268–79.CrossRef
Heijmans MMPD, Klees H, Berendse F. 2002a. Competition between Sphagnum magellanicum and Eriophorum angustifolium as affected by raised CO2 and increased N deposition. Oikos 97:415–25.CrossRef
Heijmans MMPD, Klees H, Visser Wd, Berendse F. 2002b. Effects of increased nitrogen deposition on the distibution of 15 N-labeled nitrogen between Sphagnum and vascular plants. Ecosystems 5:500–8.
Heijmans MMPD, Mauquoy D, Van Geel B, Berendse F. 2008. Long-term effects of climate change on vegetation and carbon dynamics in peat bogs. J Veget Sci 19:307–20.CrossRef
Hobbie SE. 1996. Temperature and plant species control over litter decomposition in Alaskan tundra. Ecol Monogr 66:503–22.CrossRef
Hobbie SE, Chapin FSIII. 1998. The response of tundra plant biomass, aboveground production, nitrogen and CO2 flux to experimental warming. Ecology 79:1526–44.
Jonasson S. 1988. Evaluation of the point intercept method for the estimation of plant biomass. Oikos 52:101–6.CrossRef
Kivinen E, Pakarinen P. 1980. Peatland areas and the proportion of virgin peatlands in different countries. In: 6th International Peat Congress, Duluth. pp 52–4
Koerselman W, Meuleman AFM. 1996. The vegetation N:P ratio: a new tool to detect the nature of nutrient limitation. J Appl Ecol 33:1441–50.CrossRef
Kool A, Heijmans MMPD. 2009. Dwarf shrubs are stronger competitors than graminoid species at high nutrient supply in peat bogs. Plant Ecol 204:125–34.CrossRef
Limpens J, Berendse F. 2003. How litter quality affects mass loss and N loss from decomposing Sphagnum. Oikos 103:537–47.CrossRef
Limpens J, Berendse F, Klees H. 2004. How phosphorus availability affects the impact of nitrogen deposition on Sphagnum and vascular plants in bogs. Ecosystems 7:793–804.CrossRef
Limpens J, Heijmans MMPD, Berendse F. 2006. The nitrogen cycle in boreal peatlands. In: Wieder RK, Vitt DH, Eds. Boreal peatland ecosystems. Berlin, Heidelberg: Springer-Verlag. p 195–230.CrossRef
Lütke Twenhöven F. 1992. Competition between two Sphagnum species under different deposition levels. J Bryol 17:71–80.
Malmer N, Albinsson C, Svensson BM, Wallen B. 2003. Interferences between Sphagnum and vascular plants: effects on plant community structure and peat formation. Oikos 100:469–82.CrossRef
Malmer N, Svensson BM, Wallen B. 1994. Interactions between Sphagnum mosses and field layer vascular plants in the development of peat-forming systems. Folia Geobot Phytotaxonom 29:483–96.
Robroek BJM, Limpens J, Breeuwer A, Schouten MGC. 2007. Effects of water level and temperature on performance of four Sphagnum mosses. Plant Ecol 190:97–107.CrossRef
Rustad LE, Campbell JL, Marion GM, Norby RJ, Mitchell MJ, Hartley AE, Cornelissen JHC, Gurevitch J. 2001. A meta-analysis of the response of soil respiration, net nitrogen mineralization, and aboveground plant growth to experimental ecosystem warming. Oecologia 126:543–62.CrossRef
Rydin H, Jeglum J. 2006. The biology of peatlands. Oxford: Oxford University Press.CrossRef
Smith AJE. 1978. The moss flora of Britain and Ireland. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Solomon S, Qin D, Manning M, Chen Z, Marquis M, Averyt KB, Tignor M, Miller HL. 2007. IPCC, 2007: Climate change 2007: The physical science basis. Contribution of Working Group I to the fourth assessment report of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge.
Tarrasón L, Fagerli H, Klein H, Simpson D, Benedictow AC, Vestreng V. 2006. Trends of air-concentrations and depositions since 1990 to 2004. EMEP Status Report 1/2006, EMEP.
Turunen J, Roulet NT, Moore TR, Richard PJH. 2004. Nitrogen deposition and increased carbon accumulation in ombrotrophic peatlands in eastern Canada. Global Biogeochem Cycle 18(GB3002):1–12.
Van Breemen N. 1995. How Sphagnum bogs down other plants. Trends Ecol Evol 10:270–5.CrossRef
Vitt DH, Wieder K, Halsey LA, Turetsky M. 2003. Response of Sphagnum fuscum to nitrogen deposition: a case study of ombrogenous peatlands in Alberta, Canada. The Bryologist 106:235–45.CrossRef
Ward SE, Bardgett RD, McNamara NP, Ostle NJ. 2009. Plant functional group identity influences short-term peatland ecosystem carbon flux: evidence from a plant removal experiment. Funct Ecol 23:454–62.CrossRef
Weltzin JF, Bridgham SD, Pastor J, Chen J, Harth C. 2003. Potential effects of warming and drying on peatland plant community composition. Global Change Biol 9:141–51.CrossRef
Wiedermann MM, Gunnarsson U, Nilsson MB, Nordin A, Ericson L. 2009. Can small-scale experiments predict ecosystem responses? An example from peatlands. Oikos 118:449.CrossRef
- Field Simulation of Global Change: Transplanting Northern Bog Mesocosms Southward
- Open Access
- Available under Open Access This content is freely available online to anyone, anywhere at any time.
Volume 13, Issue 5 , pp 712-726
- Cover Date
- Print ISSN
- Online ISSN
- Additional Links
- nitrogen deposition
- aboveground production
- nutrient concentrations
- Author Affiliations
- 1. Nature Conservation and Plant Ecology, Wageningen University, P.O. Box 47, 6700 AA, Wageningen, The Netherlands
- 3. Lange Weide 41, 5397 AG, Lith, The Netherlands
- 2. Ecology and Biodiversity, Utrecht University, Padualaan 8, 3584 CH, Utrecht, The Netherlands