Skip to main content
Log in

Fire Severity in the Sierra Nevada Revisited: Conclusions Robust to Further Analysis

  • Published:
Ecosystems Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

In our previous article (Odion and Hanson, Ecosystems 9:1177–89, 2006), we reported that fire severity in the conifer forests of the Sierra Nevada mountains of California, contrary to prevailing assumptions, did not burn with predominately stand-replacing, high severity fire. The reply by Safford and others (Ecosystems, this issue) using a new mapping approach also found this pattern. Their methods identify more high severity fire; however, as we illustrate here, this may be attributed to the different mapping approaches used. We previously also found that condition class based upon fire return interval departure (FRID) was not an effective predictor of fire severity. Safford and others (this issue) concluded that there was a strong correlation between FRID-based condition class and fire severity based upon data from the McNally fire of 2002. The difference between these findings about McNally fire reflects the fact that they combined FRID categories whereas we kept the categories separate. Here, using their fire severity data to evaluate all three fires, we found that severity was not predicted by FRID. Developing a consensus definition of fire severity within the scientific community might help alleviate future contradictions regarding fire effects.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Figure 1.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Alexander JD, Seavy NE, Ralph CJ, Hogoboom B. 2006. Vegetation and topographical correlates of fire severity from two fires in the Klamath-Siskiyou region of Oregon and California. Int J Wildl Fire 15:237–45

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Azuma DL, Donnegan J, Gedney D. 2004. Southwest Oregon Biscuit fire: an analysis of forest resources and fire severity. USDA Forest Service Research Paper PNW-RP-560. Portland (OR): Pacific Northwest Research Station

  • Collins BM, Kelly M, van Wagtendonk JW, Stephens SL. 2007. Spatial patterns of large natural fires in Sierra Nevada. Landsc Ecol 22:545–57

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Key CH, Benson NC. 2005. Landscape assessment (LA). Sampling and analysis methods. In: Lutes DC, Keane RE, Caratt JF et al., Eds. FIREMON: fire effects monitoring and inventory system. General Technical Report, RMRS-GTR—164. Ogden (UT): USDA Forest Service, Rocky Mountain Research Station. p 55

  • Kokaly RF, Rockwell BW, Haire SL, King TVV. 2007. Characterization of post-fire surface cover, soils, and burn severity at the Cerro Grande Fire, New Mexico, using hyperspectral and multipsectral remote sensing. Rem Sens Environ 106:305–25

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Miller JD, Yool SR. 2002. Mapping forest post-fire canopy consumption in several overstory types using multi-temporal Landsat TM and ETM data. Rem Sens Environ 82:481–96

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Miller JD, Thode AE. 2007. Quantifying burn severity in a heterogeneous landscape with a relative version of the delta Normalized burn ratio (dNBR). Rem Sens Environ 109:66–80

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Noss RF, Franklin JF, Baker WL, Schoennagel T, Moyle PB. 2006. Managing fire-prone forests in the western United States. Front Ecol Environ 4:481–87

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Odion DC, Hanson CT. 2006. Fire severity in conifer forests of the Sierra Nevada, California. Ecosystems 9:1177–89

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Parsons A. 2003. Draft burned area emergency rehabilitaton (BAER) soil burn severity definitions and mapping guidelines. Salt Lake City (UT): USDA-Forest Service, Remote Sensing Application Center

    Google Scholar 

  • Parsons A, Orlemann A. 2002. BAER burn severity mapping methods and definitions. McNally Fire, Sequoia National Forest, July-August 2002. 3 page report on file with the Sequoia National Forest, Porterville, CA, USA

  • Safford HD, Miller J, Schmidt D, Roath B, Parsons A. 2008. BAER soil burn severity maps do not measure fire effects to vegetation. A comment on Odion and Hanson (2006). Ecosystems 11

  • Skinner CN, Chang C. 1996. Fire regimes, past and present. Sierra Nevada Ecosystem Project, Final Report to Congress, Volume II. Davis (CA): University of California, Centers for Water and Wildland Resources. pp 1041–1069

  • Stephens SL, Finney MA. 2002. Prescribed fire mortality of Sierra Nevada mixed conifer tree species: effects of crown damage and forest floor combustion. For Ecol Manage 162:261–71

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Thode AE. 2005. Quantifying the fire regime attributes of severity and spatial complexity using field and imagery data. PhD Dissertation. Davis (CA): University of California

  • United States Department of Agriculture (USDA). 2004. Sierra Nevada forest plan amendment, final supplemental environmental impact statement. Vallejo (CA): USDA Forest Service

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Dennis C. Odion.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Odion, D.C., Hanson, C.T. Fire Severity in the Sierra Nevada Revisited: Conclusions Robust to Further Analysis. Ecosystems 11, 12–15 (2008). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10021-007-9113-0

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10021-007-9113-0

Keywords

Navigation