Abstract
SO2-depolarized electrolysis (SDE) is considered as one of the most efficient hydrogen production methods. To maximize H2 production in SDE, the phenomena occurring in the cell need to be understood and controlled. In this work, electrochemically driven SO2 carry-over and elemental sulphur formation in cathode space are analysed by various methods: electrochemical, titration and photon correlation spectroscopy (PCS) under different conditions during SDE operation. The results indicate that SO2 carry-over is a fast process in an operating SDE and is difficult to control with only working parameter optimization. The PCS method provides SO2 carry-over information at early stages compared to other methods. Moreover, PCS might be further implemented as an in situ method for SDE system control.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Lewis NS, Nocera DG (2006) Powering the planet: chemical challenges in solar energy utilization. Proc Natl Acad Sci 103:15729–15735
Stolten D, Krieg D (2010) Alkaline electrolysis—introduction and overview. In: Stolten D (ed) Hydrogen and fuel cells fundamentals, technologies and applications. Weinheim, Wiley-VCH, pp. 243–270
Juda W, Moulton DM (1967) Cheap hydrogen for basic chemicals. Chem Enging Prog 63:59–60
Gorensek MB, Staser JA, Stanford TG, Weidner JW (2009) A thermodynamic analysis of the SO2/H2SO4 system in SO2-depolarized electrolysis. Int J Hydrog Energy 34:6089–6095
Lokkiluoto A, Taskinen PA, Gasik M, Kojo IV, Peltola H, Barker MH, Kleifges K-H (2012) Novel process concept for the production of H2 and H2SO4 by SO2-depolarized electrolysis. Environ Dev Sustain 14:529–540
Mauritz KA, Moore RB (2004) State of understanding of Nafion. Chem Rev 104:4535–4585
Zawodzinski TA, Neeman M, Sillerud LO, Gottesfeld S (1991) Determination of water diffusion coefficients in perfluorosulfonate ionomeric membranes. J Phys Chem 95:6040–6044
Colon-Mercado HR, Elvington MC, Hobbs DT (2008) Membrane characterization report for hybrid sulfur electrolyzer. Research report SRNS-STI-2008-00017 28 p.
Junginger R, Struck BD (1982) Separators for the electrolytic cell of the sulphuric acid hybrid cycle. Int J Hydrog Energy 7:331–340
Opeerman H, Kerres J, Krieg H (2012) SO2 crossover flux of Nafion and sFS-PBI membranes using a chronocoulometric (CC) monitoring technique. J Memb Sci 415-416:842–849
Elvington MC, Colon-Mercado H, MaCatty S, Stone SG, Hobbs DT (2010) Evaluation of proton-conducting membranes for use in a sulfur dioxide depolarized electrolyzer. J Power Sources 195:2823–2829
Staser JA, Weidner JW (2009) Sulfur dioxide crossover during the production of hydrogen and sulfuric acid in a PEM electrolyzer. J Electrochem Soc 156:B836–B841
Peach R, Krieg HM, Kruger AJ, van der Westhuizen D, Bessarabov D, Kerres J (2014) Comparison of ionically and ionical-covalently cross-linked polyaromatic membranes for SO2 electrolysis. Int J Hydrog Energy 39:28–40
Xue L, Zhang P, Chen S, Wang L, Wang J (2013) Sensitivity study of process parameters in membrane electrode assembly preparation and SO2 depolarized electrolysis. Int J Hydrog Energy 38:11017–11022
Sivasubramanian P, Ramasamy RP, Freire FJ, Holland CE, Weidner JW (2007) Electrochemical hydrogen production from thermochemical cycles using a proton exchange membrane electrolyzer. Int J Hydrog Energy 32:463–468
Steimke JL, STeeper TJ, Herman DT, Colon-Mercado HR, Elvington MC (2009) Method to prevent sulfur accumulation inside membrane electrode assembly. Research report SRNS-STI-2009-00134, 39 p.
Staser J, Ramasamy RP, Sivasubramanian P, Weidner JW (2007) Effect of water on the electochemical oxidation of gas-phase SO2 in a PEM electrolyzer for H2 production. Electrochem Solid-State Lett 10:E17–E19
Imamura D, Yamaguchi E (2009) Effect of air contaminants on electrolyte degradation in polymer electrolyte membrane fuel cells. ECS Trans 25:813–819
Kaszuba M, McKnight D, Connah MT, McNeil-Watson FK, Nobbmann U (2008) Measuring sub nanometer sizes using dynamic light scattering. J Nanoparticle Res 10:823–829
Choudhury SR, Ghosh M, Mandal A, Chakravorty D, Pal M, Pradhan S, Goswami A (2011) Surface-modified sulfur nanoparticles: an effective antifungal agent against Aspergillus niger and Fusarium oxysporum. Appl Microbiol Biotechnol 90:733–743
Deshpande AS, Khomane RB, Vaidya BK, Joshi RM, Harle AS, Kulkarni BD, (2008) Sulfur nanoparticles synthesis and characterization from H2S gas, using novel biodegradable iron chelates in aqueous surfactant systems. Materials Research Society Symposium Proceedings 1103E.
Santasalo-Aarnio A, Lokkiluoto A, Virtanen J, Gasik MM (2016) Performance of electrocatalytic gold coating on bipolar plates for SO2 depolarized electrolyser. J Power Sources 306:1–7
Mukouyama Y, Kukichi M, Okamoto H (2008) Appearance of new potential oscillation during hydrogen evolution reaction by addition of Na2SO4 and K2SO4. J Electroanal Chem 617:179–184
O’Brian JA, Hinkley JT, Donne SW, Lindquist S-E (2010) The electrochemical oxidation of aqueous sulfur dioxide: a critical review of work with respect to the hybrid sulfur cycle. Electrochim Acta 55:573–591
Quijada C, Morallon E, Vazquez JL, Berlouis LEA (2000) Electrochemical behaviour of aqueous SO2 at polycrystalline gold electrodes in acidic media: a voltammetric and in-situ virbational study. Part II. Oxidation of SO2 on bare and sulphur-modified electrodes. Electrochim Acta 46:651–659
Steimke JL, Steeper TJ, Colon-Mercado HR, Gorensek MB (2015) Development and testing of a PEM SO2-depolarized electrolyzer and an operating method that prevents sulfur accumulation. Int J Hydr Ene 40:13281–13294
Acknowledgments
The research leading to these results has received funding from the European Union’s Seventh Framework Programme (FP7), the Fuel Cell and Hydrogen Joint Undertaking, under grant agreement no. 325320 of the SOL2HY2 project.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Santasalo-Aarnio, A., Virtanen, J. & Gasik, M. SO2 carry-over and sulphur formation in a SO2-depolarized electrolyser. J Solid State Electrochem 20, 1655–1663 (2016). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10008-016-3169-8
Received:
Revised:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10008-016-3169-8