Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

A comparison of sulfur loading method on the electrochemical performance of porous carbon/sulfur cathode material for lithium–sulfur battery

  • Original Paper
  • Published:
Journal of Solid State Electrochemistry Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

To get a high sulfur loaded porous carbon/sulfur cathode material with an excellent performance, we investigated four different sulfur loading treatments. The samples were analyzed by the Brunauer–Emmett–Teller (BET), X-ray diffraction (XRD) patterns, thermal gravimetric analysis (TGA), and scanning electron microscopy (SEM). We proved that it is more effective to introduce the sulfur into the pores of porous carbon at 300 °C than at 155 °C. Especially, the porous carbon/sulfur composite heated in a sealed reactor at 300 °C for 8 h presents a fine sulfur load with sulfur content of 78 wt.% and exhibits an excellent electrochemical performance. The discharge capacity is 760, 727, 744, 713, and 575 mAh g−1 of sulfur at a current density of 80, 160, 320, 800, and 1,600 mA g−1 based on the sulfur/carbon composite, respectively. What is more, there is almost no decay at the current density of 800 mA g−1 for 50 cycles and coulombic efficiency remains over 95 %.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5
Fig. 6
Fig. 7
Fig. 8

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Aricò AS, Bruce PG, Scrosati B, Tarascon J, Schalkwijk W (2005) Nanostructured materials for advanced energy conversion and storage devices. Nat Mater 4:366–377

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Guo YG, Hu JS, Wan LJ (2008) Nanostructured materials for electrochemical energy conversion and storage devices. Adv Mater 20:2878–2887

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  3. Yamin H, Penciner J, Gorenshtain A, Elam M, Peled E (1985) The electrochemical behavior of polysulfides in tetrahydrofuran. J Power Sources 14:129–134

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  4. Yang Y, McDowell MT, Jackson A, Cha JJ, Hong SS, Cui Y (2010) New nanostructured Li2S/silicon rechargeable battery with high specific energy. Nano Lett 10:1486–1491

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  5. Whittingham MS (2004) Lithium batteries and cathode materials. Chem Rev 10:4271–4302

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Armand M, Tarascon JM (2008) Building better batteries. Nature 451:652–657

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  7. Tarascon JM, Armand M (2001) Issues and challenges facing rechargeable lithium batteries. Nature 414:359–367

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  8. Ji XL, Lee KT, Nazar LF (2009) A highly ordered nanostructured carbon–sulphur cathode for lithium–sulphur batteries. Nat Mater 8:500–506

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  9. Cheon SE, Ko KS, Cho JH, Kim SW, Chin EY, Kim HT (2003) Rechargeable lithium sulfur battery I. Structural change of sulfur cathode during discharge and charge. J Electrochem Soc 150:A796–A799

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  10. He XM, Pu WH, Ren JG, Wang L, Wang JL, Jiang CY, Wan CR (2007) Charge/discharge characteristics of sulfur composite cathode materials in rechargeable lithium batteries. Electrochim Acta 52:7372–7376

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  11. Dean JA (1985) Lange's handbook of chemistry [J]. McGrawHill, New York

    Google Scholar 

  12. Mikhaylik YV, Akridge JR (2004) Polysulfide shuttle study in the Li/S battery system. J Electrochem Soc 151:A1969–A1976

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  13. Ji X, Evers S, Black R, Nazar LF (2011) Stabilizing lithium–sulphur cathodes using polysulphide reservoirs. Nat Commun 2:325

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. Schuster J, He G, Mandlmeier B, Yim T, Lee KT, Bein T, Nazar LF (2012) Spherical ordered mesoporous carbon nanoparticles with high porosity for lithium–sulfur batteries. Angew Chem 51:3591–3595

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  15. Wang HL, Yang Y, Liang YY, Robinson JT, Li YG, Jackson A, Cui Y, Dai HJ (2011) Graphene-wrapped sulfur particles as a rechargeable lithium sulfur battery cathode material with high capacity and cycling stability. Nano Lett 11:2644–2647

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  16. Ji LW, Rao MM, Zheng HM, Zhang L, Li YC, Duan WH, Guo JH, Cairns EJ, Zhang YG (2011) Graphene oxide as a sulfur immobilizer in high performance lithium/sulfur cells. J Am Chem Soc 133:18522–18525

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  17. Xiao LF, Cao YL, Xiao J, Schwenzer B, Engelhard MH, Saraf LV, Nie Z, Exarhos GJ, Liu J (2012) A soft approach to encapsulate sulfur: polyaniline nanotubes for lithium–sulfur batteries with long cycle life. Adv Mater 24:1176–1181

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  18. Fu YZ, Manthiram A (2012) Core-shell structured sulfur-polypyrrole composite cathodes for lithium–sulfur batteries. R Soc Chem Adv 2:5927–5929

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  19. Seh ZW, Li WY, Cha JJ, Zheng GY, Yang Y, McDowell MT, Hsu PC, Cui Y (2013) Sulphur–TiO2 yolk–shell nanoarchitecture with internal void space for long-cycle lithium–sulphur batteries. Nat Commun 4:1331–1336

    Article  Google Scholar 

  20. Guo JC, Xu YH, Wang CS (2011) Sulfur-impregnated disordered carbon nanotubes cathode for lithium–sulfur batteries. Nano Lett 11:4288–4294

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  21. Zhang B, Lai C, Zhou Z, Gao XP (2009) Preparation and electrochemical properties of sulfur–acetylene black composites as cathode materials. Electrochim Acta 54:3708–3713

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  22. SenGupta AK (2002) Environmental separation of heavy metals. Engineering processes [M]. Lewis Publishers, Boca Raton

    Google Scholar 

  23. Zhang WH, Qiao D, Pan JX, Cao YL, Yang HX, Ai XP (2013) A Li+-conductive microporous carbon–sulfur composite for Li–S batteries. Electrochim Acta 87:497–502

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. College of Materials Science and Engineering, Sichuan University, Chengdu, 610064, People’s Republic of China

    Lei-lei Peng, Guo-biao Liu, Zhen-li Xu & Heng Liu

  2. College of Computer Science and Technology, Southwest University for Nationalities, Chengdu, 610041, People’s Republic of China

    Yan Wang

Authors
  1. Lei-lei Peng
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Guo-biao Liu
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. Yan Wang
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  4. Zhen-li Xu
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  5. Heng Liu
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Heng Liu.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Peng, Ll., Liu, Gb., Wang, Y. et al. A comparison of sulfur loading method on the electrochemical performance of porous carbon/sulfur cathode material for lithium–sulfur battery. J Solid State Electrochem 18, 935–940 (2014). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10008-013-2337-3

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10008-013-2337-3

Keywords

Search

Navigation