American Association of University Professors: Background facts on contingent faculty. http://www.aaup.org/AAUP/issues/contingent/contingentfacts.htm (2007
Bargozzi R., Davis R. and Warsha P. (1992). Development and test of a theory of technological learning and usage. Hum. Relations
Bates M.S. and Loddington S.P. (2006). Rights and rewards in blended institutional repositories project. ALISS Q.
Bartolo, L., Diekema, A., Khoo, M., McMartin, F.: Survey of Evaluation Projects in the National Science Digital Library, final report. NSDL PI Meeting, Washington D.C., October (2006)
Bayard, J.P., Ehrmann, S., et al.: Learning through technology: LT2
. http://www.wcer.wisc.edu/archive/cl1/ilt/default.asp (2000
Bell, V., Rothery, A.: E-Sharing: Developing Use of E-repositories and E-libraries for Learning and Teaching. West Midlands Share Project: University of Worcester (2006)
Bishop A., Van House N. and Buttenfield B. (2003). Digital Library Use: Social Practices in Design and Evaluation. MIT Press, Cambridge
Borgman, C.L., Leazer, G.H. et al.: How geography professors select materials for classroom lectures: implications for the design of digital libraries. In: Proceedings of the 4th ACM/IEEE-CS Joint Conference on Digital libraries, ACM Press, Tuscon, Arizona (2004)
Perez-Quinones M.A. and Capra R.G. (2005). Using web search engines to find and refind information. Computer
Carson S.: 2005 program evaluation findings report. MITOpenCourseWare. http://ocw.mit.edu/OcwWeb/web/about/stats/index.htm
Chang, A., Matyas, M. et al.: I came, I found it, I used it, and it made a difference. Washington, D.C., American Society for Microbiology: 8 (2004)
Chism N. (2004). Using a framework to engage faculty in instructional technologies. Educause Q.
Cohen J. (1992). A power primer. Psychol. Bull.
Davis F. (1989). Perceived usefulness, perceived ease of use and user acceptance of information technology. MIS Q.
Duval, E.: The technology of open education. Presentation at Open Education 2006: Community, Culture, and Content, Logan Utah (2006)
Gibbs E.J. and Major C.H. (2004). Faculty perception of the costs and benefits of instructional technology: implications for faculty work. J. Faculty Dev.
Giersch, S., Klotz, E.A., et al.: If you build it, will they come? Participant involvement in digital libraries. D-Lib Magazine 10(7/8) (2004)
Gilbert, S.: The Beauty of Low Threshold Applications. Syllabus Magazine. http://campustechnology.com/articles/38981/
Glaser B. and Strauss A. (1967). Discovery of Grounded Theory: Strategies for Qualitative Research. Aldine, Chicago, IL
Green, D.: Using digital images in teaching and learning: perspectives from liberal arts institutions. http://www.academiccommons.org/imagereport
Hagner P. (2000). Faculty engagement and support in the new learning environment. Educause Rev.
Harley D. (2004). The Use of Digital Resources in Humanities and Social Science Undergraduate Education. Center for Studies in Higher Education, Berkeley, CA
Harley, D.: Why understanding the use and users of OERs matters. In: Iiuoshi, T., Kumar, V. (eds.) Opening Up Education: The Collective Advancement of Education Through Open Technology, Open Content and Open Knowledge. MIT Press, Cambridge (2008, Forthcoming)
IES National Center for Education Statistics: Digest of Education Statistics. http://nces.ed.gov/programs/digest/d06/tables/dt06_237.asp
Khoo, M., Donahue, R.: Evaluating digital libraries with Webmetrics. In: Proceedings from the ACM IEEE Joint Conference on Digital Libraries, Vancouver, BC (2007)
Koppi T. and Bogle L. (2004). Institutional use of learning objects: lessons learned and future directions. J Educ Multimed Hypermedia
Lean J. and Moizer J. (2006). Simulations and games: use and barriers in higher education. Active Learn Higher Educ.
Lerman, S., Miyagawa, S., et al.: OpenCourseWare: Building a culture of sharing. In: Iiuoshi, T., Kumar, V. (eds.) Opening Up Education: The Collective Advancement of Education Through Open Technology, Open Content and Open Knowledge. MIT Press, Cambridge (2008, forthcoming)
Lossau, N.: Search engine technology and digital libraries: libraries need to discover the academic internet. D-Lib Magazine 10(6) (2004)
Lynch, C., Garcia-Molina, H.: Interoperability, scaling, and the digital libraries research agenda. http://www.hpcc.gov/reports/reports-nco-iita-dlw/main.html (1995
Macdonald R.H. and Manduca C.A. (2005). Teaching methods in undergraduate geoscience courses: results of the 2004 On the Cutting Edge survey of US faculty. J. Geosci. Educ.
Manduca, C.A., Iverson, E.R., et al.: Influencing user behavior through digital library design: an example from the geosciences. D-Lib 11(5) (2005)
Manduca, C.A., Fox, S., et al.: Digital library as network and community center. D-Lib 12(12) (2006)
Marchioni G. (2006). Exploratory search: from finding to understanding. Communications
Mason B. (2006). Omniture and other evaluation tools for ComPADRE. NSDL 2006 Annual PI Meeting, Washington DC
Matkin G. (2002). Learning Object Repositories: Problems and Promise. The William and Flora Hewlett Foundation Menlo Park, CA
McMartin, F., Iverson, E., et al.: Factors motivating use of digital libraries. Proceedings of the 6th ACM/IEEE-CS joint conference on Digital libraries, ACM Press, Tuscon (2006) NSDL: About NSDL. http://nsdl.org/about/
Russell, D.M.: What are they thinking? Searching for the mind of the searcher. Joint Conference on Digital Libraries, Vancouver, BC (2007)
Smith, M., Barton, M., Bass, M., Branschofsky, M., McClellan, G., Stuve, D., Tansley, R., Walker, J.H.: DSPACE: an open source dynamic digital repository. D-Lib Magazine 9(1) (2003)
Spotts T. and Bowman M. (1995). Faculty use of instructional technologies in higher education. Educ. Technol.
Teevan, J., Alvarado, C., et al.: The Perfect search engine is not enough: a study of orienteering behavior in directed search. In: Proceedings, SIGCHI Conf. Human Factors in Computing Systems, Vienna, Austria, ACM Press, Tuscon (2004)
Thomas, A., Rothery, A.: Online repositories for learning materials. Ariadne 45 (2005)
Thong J.Y.L. and Hong W.Y. (2002). Understanding user acceptance of digital libraries: what are the roles of interface characteristics, organizational context and individual differences?. International J. Hum.-Comput. Stud.
Uijtdehaage S.H.J. and Contini J. (2003). Sharing digital teaching resources: breaking down barriers by addressing the concerns of the faculty members. Acad. Med.
Van House, N.A., Butler, M.H., et al.: User-centered iterative design for digital libraries: the cypress experience. D-Lib Magazine 2(2) (1996)
Wolcott L. and Betts K. (1999). What’s in it for me? incentives for faculty participation in distance education. J. Dist. Educ.