European Child & Adolescent Psychiatry

, Volume 22, Issue 6, pp 329–340

Diagnostic procedures in autism spectrum disorders: a systematic literature review

Authors

    • School of Occupational Therapy and Social Work, Faculty of Health Sciences, Curtin Health Innovation Research InstituteCurtin University
    • School of Occupational TherapyLa Trobe University
    • School of Health SciencesJönköping University
    • Department of Medicine and Health Sciences (IMH), Faculty of Health Sciences, Rehabilitation MedicinePain and Rehabilitation Centre, Linköping University, UHL
  • Katie Anderson
    • School of Occupational Therapy and Social Work, Faculty of Health Sciences, Curtin Health Innovation Research InstituteCurtin University
  • Marita Falkmer
    • School of Occupational Therapy and Social Work, Faculty of Health Sciences, Curtin Health Innovation Research InstituteCurtin University
    • School of Education and Communication, CHILD Programme, Institute of Disability ResearchJönköping University
  • Chiara Horlin
    • School of Occupational Therapy and Social Work, Faculty of Health Sciences, Curtin Health Innovation Research InstituteCurtin University
Review

DOI: 10.1007/s00787-013-0375-0

Cite this article as:
Falkmer, T., Anderson, K., Falkmer, M. et al. Eur Child Adolesc Psychiatry (2013) 22: 329. doi:10.1007/s00787-013-0375-0

Abstract

At present, ‘gold standard’ diagnosis of autism spectrum disorders (ASD) is a lengthy and time consuming process that requires suitably qualified multi-disciplinary team (MDT) personnel to assess behavioural, historical, and parent-report information to determine a diagnosis. A number of different tools have been developed to assist in determination. To optimise the diagnostic procedures, the best diagnostic instruments need to be identified. This study is a systematic review addressing the accuracy, reliability, validity and utility of reported diagnostic tools and assessments. To be included in this review, studies must have (1) identified an ASD diagnostic tool; (2) investigated either diagnostic procedure or the tools or personnel required; (3) be presented in English; (4) be conducted in the Western world; (5) be one of three types of studies [adapted from Samtani et al. in Cochrane Database Syst Rev 3:1–13, 2011], viz. (a) cohort studies or cross-sectional studies, (b) randomised studies of test accuracy, (c) case–control studies. MEDLINE, PsychINFO, Scopus, EMBASE, and Cochrane Library databases were scrutinised for relevant literature published from 2000 inclusive on 20th January 2012. In total, 68 articles were included. 17 tools were assessed. However, many lacked an evidence base of high quality-independent studies. The Autism Diagnostic Interview-Revised (ADI-R) and Autism Diagnostic Observation Schedule (ADOS) stood out with the largest evidence base and highest sensitivity and specificity. When the ADI-R and ADOS were used in combination they revealed levels of accuracy very similar to the correct classification rates for the current ‘gold standard’ diagnostic procedure viz. 80.8 % for ASD. There is scope for future studies on the use of the ADI-R and ADOS in combination.

Keywords

Autism spectrum disorder Diagnosis Systematic review ADOS ADI-R

Abbreviations

MDT

Multi-disciplinary team

ADOS

Autism diagnostic observation schedule

ADI-R

Autism diagnostic interview-revised

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg 2013