Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Do adolescent child abusers, peer abusers, and non-sex offenders have different personality profiles?

  • Original Contribution
  • Published:
European Child & Adolescent Psychiatry Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

The aim of this study was to identify two sub-populations of sex offenders based on the age of the victims and on the age difference between the abuser and the victim (child sexual abusers vs. peer sexual abusers), and to compare the personality characteristics of these two subgroups with those of juvenile non-sex offenders. The group was composed of 67 adolescent offenders aged 13–18 years who were adjudicated for sexual offenses or non-sexual offenses: 20 non-sex offenders (JNSOs), 26 child sexual abusers (CAs), and 21 peer sexual abusers (PAs). The Millon Adolescent Clinical Inventory (MACI) was administered to all participants. The mean scores and clinical cutoffs on the MACI scales were compared across the three samples. Compared with PAs, CAs were more submissive and conforming, and they experienced more anxious feelings. Peer sexual abusers scored higher on the unruly and forceful personality scales, on social insensitivity, and on delinquent predisposition. Peer sexual abusers also reported higher scores on substance-abuse proneness, impulsive propensities, and antisocial functioning than CAs, but their scores were similar to those of JNSOs. Our results show clear similarities between PAs and JNSOs in terms of personality and clinical characteristics, especially with regard to antisocial personality traits. Child sexual abusers did not display the personality characteristics typical of PAs and JNSOs which predisposed them to delinquent activities. These results raise questions as to whether juvenile sex offenders should be treated within the same institutions as non-sex offenders and whether the same treatment programs should be implemented for all types of juvenile sex offenders.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Awad GA, Saunders EB (1991) Male adolescent sexual assaulters. J Interpers Violence 6:446–460

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Knight RA, Prentky RA (1993) Exploring characteristics for classifying juvenile sex offenders. In: Barbaree HE, Marshall WL, Hudson SM (eds) The Juvenile Sex Offender. The Guildford Press, New York, pp 45–83

    Google Scholar 

  3. Worling R (2001) Personality-Based typology of adolescent male sexual offenders: differences in recidivism rates, victim-selection characteristics, and personal victimization histories. Sex Abuse 13:149–166

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  4. Herkov MJ, Gynther MD, Thomask S, Myers WC (1996) MMPI differences among adolescent inpatients, rapists, sodomists, and sexual abusers. J Pers Assess 66:81–90

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  5. Hunter JA, Figueredo AJ, Malamuth NM, Becker JV (2003) Juvenile sex offenders: toward the development of a typology. Sex abuse 15:27–48

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Freeman KA, Dexter-Mazza ET, Hoffman KC (2005) Comparing personality characteristics of juvenile sex offenders and non-sex offending delinquent peers:a preliminary investigation. Sex Abuse 17:3–12

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Van Wijk A, Mali R, Bullens RA (2007) Juvenile sex only and sex plus offenders. An exploratory study on criminal profiles. Int J Offender Ther Comp Criminol 51:407–419

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. Van Wijk A, Vermeiren R, Loeber R, Hart-Kerkhoffs L, Doreleijers T, Bullens R (2006) Juvenile sex offenders compared to non-sex offenders: a review of the literature 1995–2005. Trauma Violence Abuse 7:227–243

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Hastings T, Anderson SJ, Hemphill P (1997) Comparisons of daily stress, coping, problem behavior, and cognitive distortions in adolescent sexual offenders and conduct-disordered youth. Sex Abuse 9:30–41

    Google Scholar 

  10. Jacobs WL, Kennedy WA, Meyer JB (1997) Juvenile delinquents: a between-group comparison study of sexual and nonsexual offenders. Sex Abuse 9:201–217

    Google Scholar 

  11. Butler SM, Seto MC (2002) Distinguishing two types of adolescent sex offenders. J Am Acad Child Adolesc Psychiatry 41:83–90

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. Ronis S, Borduin CM (2007) Individual, family, peer and academic characteristics of male juvenile sexual offenders. J Abnorm Child Psychol 35:153–163

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. Seto MC, Lalumière ML (2010) What is so special about male adolescent sexual offending ? A review and test of explanations through Meta-Analysis. Psychol Bull 136:526–575

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  14. Connolly M, Woollons R (2008) Childhood sexual experience and adult offending: an exploratory comparison of three criminal groups. Child Abuse Rev 17:119–132

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. Segal LV, Marshall WL (1985) Heterosexual social skills in a population of rapists and child molesters. J Consult Clin Psychol 53:55–63

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  16. Hsu LKG, Starzynski J (1990) Adolescent rapist and adolescent child sexual assaulters. Int J Offender Th Comp Criminol 34:23–30

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. Carpenter DR, Peed SF, Eastman B (1995) Personality characteristics of adolescent sexual offenders: a pilot study. Sex Abuse 7:194–203

    Google Scholar 

  18. Katz RC (1990) Psychological adjustment in adolescent child molester. Child Abuse Negl 14:567–575

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  19. Hendriks J, Bijleveld CCJH (2004) Juvenile sexual offenders: contrasting child abusers with peer abusers. Crim Behav Ment Health 14:238–250

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  20. Gunby C, Woodhams J (2010) Sexually deviant juveniles: comparisons between the offender and offence characteristics of ‘child abusers’ and ‘peer abusers’. Psychol Crime Law 16:47–64

    Article  Google Scholar 

  21. Ford M, Linney J (1995) Comparative analysis of juvenile sexual offenders, violent nonsexual and status offenders. J Interpers Violence 10:56–70

    Article  Google Scholar 

  22. Kemper TS, Kistner JA (2010) An evaluation of classification criteria for juvenile sex offenders. Sex Abuse 22:172–190

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  23. Kemper TS, Kistner JA (2007) Offense history and recidivism in three victim-age-based groups of juvenile sex offenders. Sex Abuse 19:409–424

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  24. Jepersen AF, Lalumière ML, Seto MC (2009) Sexual abuse history among adult sex offenders and non-sex offenders: a meta-analysis. Child Abuse Neglect 33:179–192

    Article  Google Scholar 

  25. Millon T (1993) Millon adolescent clinical inventory. National Computers systems, Minneapolis

    Google Scholar 

  26. APA American Psychiatric Association (1994) Diagnostic and statistical manual of mental disorders, 4th edn. APA, Washington

    Google Scholar 

  27. Salekin RT (2002) Factors-analysis of the millon adolescent clinical inventory in a juvenile offender population: implications for treatment. J of offender Rehabil 34:15–29

    Article  Google Scholar 

  28. Richardson G, Kelly TP, Graham F, Bhate SR (2004) A personality-based taxonomy of sexually abusive adolescents derived from the Millon Adolescent Clinical Inventory (MACI). Br J Clin Psychol 43:285–298

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  29. Oxnam P, Vess J (2008) A typology of adolescent sexual offenders: millon adolescent clinical inventory profiles, developmental factors and offence characteristics. J Forens Psychiatry Psychol 19:228–242

    Article  Google Scholar 

  30. Murrie DC, Cornell DG (2000) The millon adolescent clinical inventory and psychopathy. J Pers Assess 75:110–125

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  31. Stefurak T, Calhoun GB, Glaser BA (2004) Personality typologies of male juvenile offenders using a cluster analysis of the millon adolescent clinical inventory. Int J Offender Ther Comp Criminol 48:96–110

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  32. Pham T, Ducro C, Lemasson AC (2010) Adolescent sex offenders: aetilogical, diagnoses and prognoses characteristics. Ann Med Psychol 168:454–457

    Google Scholar 

  33. Mathys C, Born M (2009) Intervention in juvenile delinquency. danger of iatrogenic effects? Child Youth Serv Rev 31:217–221

    Google Scholar 

  34. Parks GA, Bard DE (2006) Risk factors for adolescent sex offender recidivism: evaluation of predictive factors and comparison of three groups based upon victim type. Sex Abuse 18:319–342

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Conflict of interest

None.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Fabienne Glowacz.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Glowacz, F., Born, M. Do adolescent child abusers, peer abusers, and non-sex offenders have different personality profiles?. Eur Child Adolesc Psychiatry 22, 117–125 (2013). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00787-012-0333-2

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00787-012-0333-2

Keywords

Navigation