Skip to main content

Advertisement

SpringerLink
Log in

Adhesion of multimode adhesives to enamel and dentin after one year of water storage

  • Original Article
  • Published:
Clinical Oral Investigations Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Objectives

This study aimed to evaluate the ultramorphological characteristics of tooth–resin interfaces and the bond strength (BS) of multimode adhesive systems to enamel and dentin.

Methods

Multimode adhesives (Scotchbond Universal (SBU) and All-Bond Universal) were tested in both self-etch and etch-and-rinse modes and compared to control groups (Optibond FL and Clearfil SE Bond (CSB)). Adhesives were applied to human molars and composite blocks were incrementally built up. Teeth were sectioned to obtain specimens for microtensile BS and TEM analysis. Specimens were tested after storage for either 24 h or 1 year. SEM analyses were performed to classify the failure pattern of beam specimens after BS testing.

Results

Etching increased the enamel BS of multimode adhesives; however, BS decreased after storage for 1 year. No significant differences in dentin BS were noted between multimode and control in either evaluation period. Storage for 1 year only reduced the dentin BS for SBU in self-etch mode. TEM analysis identified hybridization and interaction zones in dentin and enamel for all adhesives. Silver impregnation was detected on dentin–resin interfaces after storage of specimens for 1 year only with the SBU and CSB.

Conclusions

Storage for 1 year reduced enamel BS when adhesives are applied on etched surface; however, BS of multimode adhesives did not differ from those of the control group. In dentin, no significant difference was noted between the multimode and control group adhesives, regardless of etching mode.

Clinical relevance

In general, multimode adhesives showed similar behavior when compared to traditional adhesive techniques. Multimode adhesives are one-step self-etching adhesives that can also be used after enamel/dentin phosphoric acid etching, but each product may work better in specific conditions.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Guba CJ, Cochran MA, Swartz ML (1994) The effects of varied etching time and etching solution viscosity on bond strength and enamel morphology. Oper Dent 19:146–153

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. Fanchi M, Breschi L (1995) Effects of acid-etching solutions on human enamel and dentin. Quintessence Int 26:431–435

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. EJ S Jr, Perdigão J, Heymann HO (1995) Bonding to enamel and dentin: a brief history and state of the art, 1995. Quintessence Int 26:95–110

    Google Scholar 

  4. Lopes GC, Thys DG, Klaus P, Oliveira GM, Widmer N (2007) Enamel acid etching: a review. Compend Contin Educ Dent 28:18–24

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Pahlavan A, Dennison JB, Charbeneau GT (1976) Penetration of restorative resins into acid-etched human enamel. J Amer Dent Assoc 93:1170–1176

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Low T, Lee KW, von Fraunhofer JA (1978) The adaptation of composite materials to etched enamel surfaces. J Oral Rehabil 5:349–355

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Menezes LF, Chevitarese O (1994) Sealant and resin viscosity and their influence on the formation of resin tags. Angle Orthod 64:383–388

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. Browning WD, Brackett WW, Gilpatrick RO (2000) Two-year clinical comparison of a microfilled and a hybrid resin-based composite in non-carious class V lesions. Oper Dent 25:46–50

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Ozgunaltay G, Onen A (2002) Three-year clinical evaluation of a resin modified glass-ionomer cement and a composite resin in non-carious class V lesions. J Oral Rehabil 29:1037–1041

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. Haller B (2013) Which self-etch bonding systems are suitable for which clinical indications? Quintessence Int 44:645–661

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. Mahn E, Rousson V, Heintze S (2015) Meta-analysis of the influence of bonding parameters on the clinical outcome of tooth-colored cervical restorations. J Adhes Dent 17:391–403

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. Peumans M, De Munck J, Van Landuyt KL, Poitevin A, Lambrechts P, Van Meerbeek B (2010) Eight-year clinical evaluation of a 2-step self-etch adhesive with and without selective enamel etching. Dent Mater 26:1176–1184

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. De Goes MF, Giannini M, Daronch M, Arrais CAG, Di Hipólito V, Rueggeberg FA (2007) Bond strength and monomer conversion of bonding agents mixed with restorative composites prior to light exposure. J Adhes 83:83–113

    Google Scholar 

  14. Sadek FT, Calheiros FC, Cardoso PE, Kawano Y, Tay F, Ferrari M (2008) Early and 24-hour bond strength and degree of conversion of etch-and-rinse and self-etch adhesives. Am J Dent 21:30–44

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  15. Albuquerque M, Pegoraro M, Mattei G, Reis A, Loguercio AD (2008) Effect of double-application or the application of a hydrophobic layer for improved efficacy of one-step self-etch systems in enamel and dentin. Oper Dent 33:564–570

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  16. Andrade e Silva SM, Carrilho MR, Marquezini Junior L, Garcia FC, Manso AP, Alves MC, de Carvalho RM (2009) Effect of an additional hydrophilic versus hydrophobic coat on the quality of dentinal sealing provided by two-step etch-and-rinse adhesives. J Appl Oral Sci 17:184–189.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  17. Tay FR, Carvalho R, Sano H, Pashley DH (2000) Effect of smear layers on the bonding of a self-etching primer to dentin. J Adhes Dent 2:99–116

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  18. Tay FR, Pashley DH (2001) Aggressiveness of contemporary self-etching systems. I: Depth of penetration beyond dentin smear layers. Dent Mater 17:296–308

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  19. Tjäderhane L, Nascimento FD, Breschi L, Mazzoni A, Tersariol IL, Geraldeli S, Tezvergil-Mutluay A, Carrilho M, Carvalho RM, Tay FR, Pashley DH (2013) Strategies to prevent hydrolytic degradation of the hybrid layer—a review. Dent Mater 29:999–1011

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  20. Mazzoni A, Scaffa P, Carrilho M, Tjäderhane L, Di Lenarda R, Polimeni A, Tezvergil-Mutluay A, Tay FR, Pashley DH, Breschi L (2013) Effects of etch-and-rinse and self-etch adhesives on dentin MMP-2 and MMP-9. J Dent Res 92:82–86

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  21. Kalavacharla V, Lawson N, Ramp L, Burgess J (2015) Influence of etching protocol and silane treatment with a universal adhesive on lithium disilicate bond strength. Oper Dent 40:372–378

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  22. Marchesi G, Frassetto A, Mazzoni A, Apolonio F, Diolosa M, Cadenaro M, Di Lenarda R, Pashley DH, Tay F, Breschi L (2014) Adhesive performance of a multimode adhesive system: 1-year in vitro study. J Dent 42:603–612

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  23. Perdigão J, Kose C, Mena-Serrano AP, De Paula EA, Tay LY, Reis A, Loguercio AD (2014) A new universal simplified adhesive: 18-month clinical evaluation. Oper Dent 39:113–127

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  24. Wagner A, Wendler M, Petschelt A, Belli R, Lohbauer U (2014) Bonding performance of universal adhesives in different etching modes. J Dent 42:800–807

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  25. Kim JH, Chae SY, Lee Y, Han GJ, Cho BH (2015) Effects of multipurpose, universal adhesives on resin bonding to zirconia ceramics. Oper Dent 40:55–62

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  26. Kaaden C, Powers JM, Friedl KH, Schmalz G (2002) Bond strength of self-etching adhesives to dental hard tissues. Clinical Oral Investigation 6:155–160

    Article  Google Scholar 

  27. Miyazaki M, Hinoura K, Honjo G, Onose H (2002) Effect of self-etching primer application method on enamel bond strength. Am J Dent 15:412–416

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  28. Kanemura N, Sano H, Tagami J (1999) Tensile bond strength to and SEM evaluation of ground and intact enamel surfaces. J Dent 27:523–530

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  29. Shinohara MS, Oliveira MT, Di Hipólito V, Giannini M, De Goes MF (2006) SEM analysis of the acid-etched enamel patterns promoted by acidic monomers and phosphoric acids. J Appl Oral Sci 14:427–435

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  30. Sadek FT, Monticelli F, Muench A, Ferrari M, Cardoso PE (2006) A novel method to obtain microtensile specimens minimizing cut flaws. J Biomed Mater Res B Appl Biomater 78:7–14

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  31. McLean D, Meyers E, Guillory V, Vandewalle K (2015) Enamel bond strength of new universal adhesive bonding agents. Oper Dent 40:410–417

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  32. Yoshida Y, Nagakane K, Fukuda R, Nakayama Y, Okazaki M, Shintani H, Inoue S, Tagawa Y, Suzuki K, De Munck J, Van Meerbeek B (2004) Comparative study on adhesive performance of functional monomers. J Dent Res 83:454–458

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  33. André CB, Gomes BPFA, Duque TM, Stipp RN, Chan DC, Ambrosano GM, Giannini M (2015) Dentin bond strength and antimicrobial activity evaluation of adhesive systems. J Dent 43:466–475

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  34. Van Landuyt KL, Snauwaert J, De Munck J, Peumans M, Yoshida Y, Poitevin A, Coutinho E, Suzuki K, Lambrechts P, Van Meerbeek B (2007) Systematic review of the chemical composition of contemporary dental adhesives. Biomaterials 28:3757–3785

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  35. Reis AF, Giannini M, Pereira PNR (2007) Long-term TEM analysis of the nanoleakage patterns in resin–dentin interfaces produced by different bonding strategies. Dent Mater 23:1164–1172

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  36. Yoshida Y, Van Meerbeek B, Nakayama Y, Snauwaert J, Hellemans L, Lambrechts P, Vanherle G, Wakasa K (2000) Evidence of chemical bonding at biomaterial-hard tissue interface. J Dent Res 79:709–714

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  37. Osorio R, Ceballos L, Tay F, Cabrerizo-Vilchez MA, Toledano M (2002) Effect of sodium hypochlorite on dentin bonding with a polyalkenoic acid-containing adhesive system. J Biomed Mater Res 60:316–324

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  38. Munoz MA, Luque-Martinez I, Malaquias P, Hass V, Reis A, Campanha NH, Loguercio AD (2015) In vitro longevity of bonding properties of universal adhesives to dentin. Oper Dent 40:282–292

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  39. Reis AF, Giannini M, Pereira PN (2008) Effects of a peripheral enamel bond on the long-term effectiveness of dentin bonding agents exposed to water in vitro. J Biomed Mater Res B Appl Biomater 85:10–17

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  40. De Munck J, Van Meerbeek B, Yoshida Y, Inoue S, Vargas M, Suzuki K, Lambrechts P, Vanherle G (2003) Four-year water degradation of total-etch adhesives bonded to dentin. J Dent Res 82:136–140

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  41. Kasaz AC, Pena CE, de Alexandre RS, Viotti RG, Santana VB, Arrais CA, Giannini M, Reis AF (2012) Effects of a peripheral enamel margin on the long-term bond strength and nanoleakage of composite/dentin interfaces produced by self-adhesive and conventional resin cements. J Adhes Dent 14:251–263

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgments

This study was supported by grants from Capes (#840/2010) and CNPq (#307217-2014-0), Brazil. The authors are indebted to Eliene A. O. N. Romani (FOP-UNICAMP) for technical transmission electron microscopy support and National Center for Research in Energy and Materials (CNPEM, # SEM—16581, Campinas, SP, Brazil) for technical scanning electron microscopy support.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Operative Dentistry Division, Department of Restorative Dentistry, Piracicaba Dental School, State University of Campinas, Av. Limeira, 901, Piracicaba, SP, 13414-903, Brazil

    Paulo Moreira Vermelho & Marcelo Giannini

  2. Department of Operative Dentistry, School of Dentistry, University of Guarulhos, R. Nilo Peçanha 81, Guarrulhos, SP, 07011-040, Brazil

    André Figueiredo Reis

  3. Department of Social Dentistry, Piracicaba Dental School, State University of Campinas, Av. Limeira, 901, Piracicaba, SP, 13414-903, Brazil

    Glaucia Maria Bovi Ambrosano

Authors
  1. Paulo Moreira Vermelho
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. André Figueiredo Reis
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. Glaucia Maria Bovi Ambrosano
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  4. Marcelo Giannini
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Marcelo Giannini.

Ethics declarations

Conflict of interest

Paulo Moreira Vermelho declares that he has no conflict of interest. André Figueiredo Reis declares that he has no conflict of interest. Glaucia Maria Bovi Ambrosano declares that he has no conflict of interest. Marcelo Giannini declares that he has no conflict of interest.

Funding

The work was supported by grants from Capes (#840/2010) and CNPq (#307217-2014-0).

Ethical approval

This study used human teeth and the project was approved by local Institutional Ethics Committee (#037/2013).

Informed consent

For this type of study, formal consent is not required.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Vermelho, P.M., Reis, A.F., Ambrosano, G.M.B. et al. Adhesion of multimode adhesives to enamel and dentin after one year of water storage. Clin Oral Invest 21, 1707–1715 (2017). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00784-016-1966-1

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00784-016-1966-1

Keywords

Search

Navigation