Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Comparison between two thermoplastic root canal obturation techniques regarding extrusion of root canal filling—a retrospective in vivo study

  • Original Article
  • Published:
Clinical Oral Investigations Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Objectives

The aim of this study was to compare two different thermoplastic techniques—a core-carrier technique (Thermafil) and warm vertical compaction—in terms of overextension of root canal filling in vivo.

Materials and methods

Flaring of 88 teeth was conducted using Pro Files .04 as finishing files, and the teeth were obturated using Thermafil. Flaring of 74 teeth was performed using Pro Files .06 as finishing files, and the teeth were obturated using warm vertical compaction.

Results

Seventy (80 %) of the teeth obturated using Thermafil and 31 (42 %) teeth obturated using warm vertical compaction show extruded root canal filling. In contrast to Thermafil, there is a higher rate of extruded root canal filling of teeth with more than one root canal using warm vertical compaction.

Conclusion

Thermafil demonstrated a higher rate of extruded root canal filling compared to warm vertical compaction. Warm vertical compaction is a more predictable method of filling compared to Thermafil.

Clinical relevance

Root canal filling extrusion will cause irritation of the surrounding tissue and impair repair processes. In the present in vivo study, there was a higher rate of root canal filling extrusion using Thermafil compared to warm vertical compaction.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Hulsmann M, Peters OA, Dummer PMH (2005) Mechanical preparation of root canals: shaping goals, techniques and means. Endod Top 10:30–76

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Peng L, Ye L, Tan H, Zhou X (2007) Outcome of root canal obturation by warm gutta-percha versus cold lateral condensation: a meta-analysis. J Endod 33:106–109

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. Michanowicz AE, Michanowicz JP, Michanowicz AM, Czonstkowsky M, Zullo TP (1989) Clinical evaluation of low-temperature thermoplasticized injectable gutta-percha: a preliminary report. J Endod 15:602–607

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Leduc J, Fishelberg G (2003) Endodontic obturation: a review. Gen Dent 51:232–233

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Wu MK, Fan B, Wesselink PR (2000) Diminished leakage along root canals filled with gutta-percha without sealer over time: a laboratory study. Int Endod J 33:121–125

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Gilhooly RM, Hayes SJ, Bryant ST, Dummer PM (2000) Comparison of cold lateral condensation and a warm multiphase gutta-percha technique for obturating curved root canals. Int Endod J 33:415–420

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Gilhooly RM, Hayes SJ, Bryant ST, Dummer PM (2001) Comparison of lateral condensation and thermomechanically compacted warm alpha-phase gutta-percha with a single cone for obturating curved root canals. Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod 91:89–94

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. Schafer E, Olthoff G (2002) Effect of three different sealers on the sealing ability of both thermafil obturators and cold laterally compacted gutta-percha. J Endod 28:638–642

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Silver GK, Love RM, Purton DG (1999) Comparison of two vertical condensation obturation techniques: touch ‘n heat modified and system b. Int Endod J 32:287–295

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. Johnson WB (1978) A new gutta-percha technique. J Endod 4:184–188

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. Gencoglu N, Orucoglu H, Helvacioglu D (2007) Apical leakage of different gutta-percha techniques: thermafil, js quick-fill, soft core, microseal, system b and lateral condensation with a computerized fluid filtration meter. Eur J Dent 1:97–103

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. Schilder H (1967) Filling root canals in three dimensions. Dent Clin North Am 723–44

  13. Venturi M, Breschi L (2004) Evaluation of apical filling after warm vertical gutta-percha compaction using different procedures. J Endod 30:436–440

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  14. Gencoglu N, Garip Y, Bas M, Samani S (2002) Comparison of different gutta-percha root filling techniques: thermafil, quick-fill, system b, and lateral condensation. Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod 93:333–336

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  15. Clinton K, Van Himel T (2001) Comparison of a warm gutta-percha obturation technique and lateral condensation. J Endod 27:692–695

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  16. Da Silva D, Endal U, Reynaud A, Portenier I, Orstavik D, Haapasalo M (2002) A comparative study of lateral condensation, heat-softened gutta-percha, and a modified master cone heat-softened backfilling technique. Int Endod J 35:1005–1011

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  17. Kececi AD, Unal GC, Sen BH (2005) Comparison of cold lateral compaction and continuous wave of obturation techniques following manual or rotary instrumentation. Int Endod J 38:381–388

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  18. Robinson MJ, McDonald NJ, Mullally PJ (2004) Apical extrusion of thermoplasticized obturating material in canals instrumented with Profile 0.06 or Profile GT. J Endod 30:418–421

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  19. Schaeffer MA, White RR, Walton RE (2005) Determining the optimal obturation length: a meta-analysis of literature. J Endod 31:271–274

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  20. Kojima K, Inamoto K, Nagamatsu K, Hara A, Nakata K, Morita I, Nakagaki H, Nakamura H (2004) Success rate of endodontic treatment of teeth with vital and nonvital pulps. A meta-analysis. Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod 97:95–99

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  21. Vieyra JP, Acosta J (2011) Comparison of working length determination with radiographs and four electronic apex locators. Int Endod J 44:510–518

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  22. Ruddle CJ (2010) Filling root canal systems: the Calamus 3-D obturation technique. Dent Today 29(76):78–81

    Google Scholar 

  23. Wu MK, van der Sluis LW, Wesselink PR (2002) A preliminary study of the percentage of gutta-percha-filled area in the apical canal filled with vertically compacted warm gutta-percha. Int Endod J 35:527–535

    Article  Google Scholar 

  24. Sari S, Duruturk L (2007) Radiographic evaluation of periapical healing of permanent teeth with periapical lesions after extrusion of AH plus sealer. Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod 104:e54–e59

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  25. Guess GM, Edwards KR, Yang ML, Iqbal MK, Kim S (2003) Analysis of continuous-wave obturation using a single-cone and hybrid technique. J Endod 29:509–512

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  26. Liang YH, Li G, Wesselink PR, Wu MK (2011) Endodontic outcome predictors identified with periapical radiographs and cone-beam computed tomography scans. J Endod 37:326–331

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  27. Sjogren U, Hagglund B, Sundqvist G, Wing K (1990) Factors affecting the long-term results of endodontic treatment. J Endod 16:498–504

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  28. Bergenholtz G, Lekholm U, Milthon R, Engstrom B (1979) Influence of apical overinstrumentation and overfilling on re-treated root canals. J Endod 5:310–314

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Conflict of interest

The authors deny any conflicts of interest related to this study.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Christian Tennert.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Tennert, C., Jungbäck, I.L. & Wrbas, KT. Comparison between two thermoplastic root canal obturation techniques regarding extrusion of root canal filling—a retrospective in vivo study. Clin Oral Invest 17, 449–454 (2013). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00784-012-0726-0

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00784-012-0726-0

Keywords

Navigation