Skip to main content
Log in

In the insurance business risky investments are dangerous: the case of negative risk sums

  • Published:
Finance and Stochastics Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

We investigate models with negative risk sums when the company invests its reserve into a risky asset whose price follows a geometric Brownian motion. Our main result is an exact asymptotic of the ruin probabilities for the case of exponentially distributed benefits. As in the case of non-life insurance with exponential claims, the ruin probabilities are either decreasing with a rate given by a power function (the case of small volatility) or equal to one identically (the case of large volatility). The result allows us to quantify the share of reserve to invest into such a risky asset to avoid a catastrophic outcome, namely the ruin with probability one. We address also the question of smoothness of the ruin probabilities as a function of the initial reserve for generally distributed jumps.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Albrecher, H., Badescu, A., Landriault, D.: On the dual risk model with taxation. Insur. Math. Econ. 42, 1086–1094 (2008)

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  2. Asmussen, S., Albrecher, H.: Ruin Probabilities. World Scientific, Singapore (2010)

    MATH  Google Scholar 

  3. Avanzi, B., Gerber, H.U., Shiu, E.S.W.: Optimal dividends in the dual model. Insur. Math. Econ. 41, 111–123 (2007)

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  4. Bayraktar, E., Egami, M.: Optimizing venture capital investments in a jump diffusion model. Math. Methods Oper. Res. 67, 21–42 (2008)

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  5. Belkina, T.: Risky investments for insurers and sufficiency theorems for the survival probability. Markov Process. Relat. Fields 20, 505–525 (2014)

    MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  6. Belkina, T.A., Konyukhova, N.B., Kurochkin, S.V.: Singular boundary value problem for the integro-differential equation in an insurance model with stochastic premiums: analysis and numerical solution. Comput. Math. Math. Phys. 52, 1384–1416 (2012)

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  7. Belkina, T., Konyukhova, N., Kurochkin, S.: Singular problems for integro-differential equations in dynamic insurance models. In: Pinelas, S., et al. (eds.) Proc. Intern. Conf. on Differential and Difference Equations and Applications (in Honour of Prof. Ravi P. Agarval). Springer Proceedings in Mathematics & Statistics, vol. 47, pp. 27–44 (2013)

    Google Scholar 

  8. Borodin, A.N., Salminen, P.: Handbook of Brownian Motion—Facts and Formulae. Birkhäuser, Basel (2002)

    Book  MATH  Google Scholar 

  9. Dufresne, D.: The distribution of a perpetuity, with application to risk theory and pension funding. Scand. Actuar. J., 39–79 (1990)

  10. Fedoryuk, M.V.: Asymptotic Analysis: Linear Ordinary Differential Equations. Springer, Berlin (1993)

    Book  MATH  Google Scholar 

  11. Feller, W.: An Introduction to Probability Theory and Its Applications, vol. 2. Wiley, New York (1996)

    MATH  Google Scholar 

  12. Frolova, A.G.: Some mathematical models of risk theory. All-Russian school-colloquium on stochastic methods in geometry and analysis. Abstracts, 117–118 (1994, unpublished)

  13. Frolova, A., Kabanov, Yu., Pergamenshchikov, S.: In the insurance business risky investments are dangerous. Finance Stoch. 6, 227–235 (2002)

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  14. Gaier, J., Grandits, P.: Ruin probabilities and investment under interest force in the presence of regularly varying tails. Scand. Actuar. J., 256–278 (2004)

  15. Goldie, C.M.: Implicit renewal theory and tails of solutions of random equations. Ann. Appl. Probab. 1, 126–166 (1991)

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  16. Grandell, I.: Aspects of Risk Theory. Springer, Berlin (1990)

    MATH  Google Scholar 

  17. Grandits, P.: A Karamata-type theorem and ruin probabilities for an insurer investing proportionally in the stock market. Insur. Math. Econ. 34, 297–305 (2004)

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  18. Harrison, M.: Ruin problems with compounding assets. Stoch. Process. Appl. 5, 67–79 (1977)

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  19. Hult, H., Lindskog, F.: Ruin probabilities under general investments and heavy-tailed claims. Finance Stoch. 15, 243–265 (2011)

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  20. Kalashnikov, V., Norberg, R.: Ruin probability under random interest rate, 2. Preprint, Lab. of Actuarial Math., University of Copenhagen, Copenhagen (1999)

  21. Kalashnikov, V., Norberg, R.: Power tailed ruin probabilities in the presence of risky investments. Stoch. Process. Appl. 98, 211–228 (2002)

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  22. Matsumoto, H., Yor, M.: Exponential functionals of Brownian motion, I: probability laws at fixed time. Probab. Surv. 2, 312–347 (2005)

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  23. Norberg, R.: Ruin problems with assets and liabilities of diffusion type. Stoch. Process. Appl. 81, 255–269 (1999)

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  24. Nyrhinen, H.: On the ruin probabilities in a general economic environment. Stoch. Process. Appl. 83, 319–330 (1999)

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  25. Nyrhinen, H.: Finite and infinite time ruin probabilities in a stochastic economic environment. Stoch. Process. Appl. 92, 265–285 (2001)

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  26. Paulsen, J.: Sharp conditions for certain ruin in a risk process with stochastic return on investments. Stoch. Process. Appl. 75, 135–148 (1998)

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  27. Paulsen, J., Gjessing, H.K.: Ruin theory with stochastic return on investments. Adv. Appl. Probab. 29, 965–985 (1997)

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  28. Pergamenshchikov, S., Zeitouni, O.: Ruin probability in the presence of risky investments. Stoch. Process. Appl. 116, 267–278 (2006)

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  29. Pergamenshchikov, S.: Erratum to: “Ruin probability in the presence of risky investments” [Stoch. Process. Appl. 116, 267–278 (2006)]. Stoch. Process. Appl. 119, 305–306 (2009)

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  30. Revuz, D., Yor, M.: Continuous Martingales and Brownian Motion, 3rd edn. Springer, Berlin (1999)

    Book  MATH  Google Scholar 

  31. Saxén, T.: On the probability of ruin in the collective risk theory for insurance enterprises with only negative risk sums. Scand. Actuar. J., 199–228 (1948)

  32. Wang, G., Wu, R.: Distributions for the risk process with a stochastic return on investments. Stoch. Process. Appl. 95, 329–341 (2001)

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  33. Yor, M.: On some exponential functionals of Brownian motion. Adv. Appl. Probab. 24, 509–531 (1992)

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

The research is funded by the grant of the Government of Russian Federation no. 14.A12.31.0007. The second author is partially supported by International Laboratory of Statistics of Stochastic Processes and Quantitative Finance of National Research Tomsk State University.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Yuri Kabanov.

Additional information

Dedicated to the memory of Marc Yor.

Appendix: Ergodic theorem for an autoregression with random coefficients

Appendix: Ergodic theorem for an autoregression with random coefficients

Let \((a_{n},b_{n})_{n\ge1}\) be an i.i.d. sequence of random variables in \({\mathbb {R}}^{2}\) and \(x_{0}\) an arbitrary constant. Define the sequence \((x_{n})\) recursively by the formula

$$ x_{n}=a_{n}\,x_{n-1}+b_{n}, \quad n\ge1. $$

Proposition A.1

Assume that there exists \(\delta\in(0,1]\) such that

$$ {\mathbf {E}}|a_{1}|^{\delta}< 1, \qquad {\mathbf {E}}|b_{1}|^{\delta}< \infty. $$

Then for any bounded uniformly continuous function \(f\),

$$ {\mathbf {P}}\hbox{-}\lim_{N}\frac{1}{N}\sum^{N}_{n=1}f(x_{n})= {\mathbf {E}}f(\zeta), $$

where

$$ \zeta=\sum^{\infty}_{k=1}\,b_{k}\, \prod^{k-1}_{j=1}\, a_{j} \quad\textit{with}\quad \prod^{0}_{j=1}a_{j}=1. $$

The proof is given in [28].

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Kabanov, Y., Pergamenshchikov, S. In the insurance business risky investments are dangerous: the case of negative risk sums. Finance Stoch 20, 355–379 (2016). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00780-016-0292-4

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00780-016-0292-4

Keywords

Mathematics Subject Classification

JEL Classification

Navigation