Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

Nightingallery: theatrical framing and orchestration in participatory performance

  • Original Article
  • Published:
Personal and Ubiquitous Computing Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

The Nightingallery project encouraged participants to converse, sing, and perform with a musically responsive animatronic bird, playfully interacting with the character while members of the public could look on and observe. We used Nightingallery to frame an HCI investigation into how people would engage with one another when confronted with unfamiliar technologies in conspicuously public, social spaces. Structuring performances as improvisational street theatre, we styled our method of exhibiting the bird character. We cast ourselves in supporting roles as carnival barkers and minders of the bird, presenting him as if he were a fantastical creature in a fairground sideshow display, allowing him the agency to shape and maintain dialogues with participants, and positioning him as the focal character upon which the encounter was centred. We explored how the anthropomorphic nature of the bird itself, along with the cultural connotations associated with the carnival/sideshow tradition helped signpost and entice participants through the trajectory of their encounters with the exhibit. Situating ourselves as secondary characters within the narrative defining the performance/use context, our methods of mediation, observation, and evaluation were integrated into the performance frame. In this paper, we explore recent HCI theories in mixed reality performance to reflect upon how genre-based cultural connotations can be used to frame trajectories of experience, and how manipulation of roles and agency in participatory performance can facilitate HCI investigation of social encounters with playful technologies.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5
Fig. 6
Fig. 7
Fig. 8
Fig. 9
Fig. 10

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Benford S, Crabtree A, Reeves S, Sheridan J, Dix A, Flintham M, Drozd A (2006) The frame of the game: blurring the boundary between fiction and reality in mobile experiences. In Proceedings of the SIGCHI conference on human factors in computing systems, ACM, New York, pp 427–436

  2. Benford S, Fraser M, Reynard G, Koleva B, Drozd A (2002) Staging and evaluating public performances as an approach to CVE research. In Proceedings of the 4th international conference on Collaborative virtual environments, CVE’02, pp 80–87

  3. Benford S, Giannachi G (2011) Performing mixed reality. The MIT Press, Cambridge

    Google Scholar 

  4. Bevilacqua F, Fels S, Jensenius AR, Lyons MJ, Schnell N, Tanaka A (2013) SIG NIME: music, technology, and human–computer interaction. In CHI EA’13

  5. Dalsgaard P, Hansen LK (2008) Performing perception: staging aesthetics of interaction. ToCHi: transactions of computer–human interaction, 15:3–4, 13.11–13.33

  6. England D, Fantauzzacoffin J, Schiphorst T, Latulipe C, Candy L (2013) Digital art: challenging perspectives. In: CHI EA’13

  7. Gaver W (2007) Cultural commentators: non-native interpretations as resources for polyphonic assessment. Int J Hum Comput Stud 65(4):292–305

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  8. Gunning T (1989) An aesthetic of astonishment: early film and the incredulous spectator. Art Text 34:31–45

    Google Scholar 

  9. Höök K, Sengers P, Andersson G (2003) Sense and sensibility: evaluation and interactive art. In:Proc CHI’03, pp 241–248

  10. Jacucci C, Jacucci G, Wagner I, Psik T (2005) A manifesto for the performative development of ubiquitous media. In Proceedings of the 4th decennial conference on Critical computing: between sense and sensibility (CC ‘05), NY, pp 19–28

  11. Jacucci J, Spagnolli A, Chalambalakis A, Morrison A, Liikkanen L, Roveda S, Bertoncini M (2009) Bodily Explorations in space: social experience of a multimodal art installation. In Proceedings of INTERACT ‘09, 62–75

  12. Lightman B (2007) Victorian popularizers of science: designing nature for new audiences. University of Chicago Press, Chicago

    Book  Google Scholar 

  13. McCarthy J, Wright P (2004) Technology as experience. The MIT Press, Cambridge

    Google Scholar 

  14. Munster A (2006) Materializing new media: embodiment in information aesthetics (interfaces: studies in visual culture), Dartmouth College Press, Hanover, New Hampshire

  15. Penny S, Smith J, Sengers P, Bernhardt A, Schulte J (2001) Traces: embodied immersive interaction with semi-autonomous avatars. Convergence 7(2):47

    Google Scholar 

  16. Reeves S (2011) Designing interfaces in public settings: understanding the role of the spectator in human–computer interaction (1st ed.). Springer

  17. Reeves S, Benford S, O’Malley C, Fraser M (2005) Designing the spectator experience. In Proc CHI’05, pp 741–750

  18. Schechner R (1988) Performance theory. Routledge, New York

    Google Scholar 

  19. Schechner R (2002) Performance studies: an introduction. Routledge, New York

    Google Scholar 

  20. Schiphorst T (2011) Self-evidence: applying somatic connoisseurship to experience design. In CHI EA’11, pp 145–160

  21. Schnädelbach H, Egglestone SR, Reeves S, Benford S, Walker B, Wright M (2008) Performing thrill: designing telemetry systems and spectator interfaces for amusement rides. In Proceedings of CHI ‘08, pp 1167–1176

  22. Sengers P, Gaver B (2006) Staying open to interpretation: engaging multiple meanings in design and evaluation. In Proceedings of the 6th conference on designing interactive systems, DIS’06, pp 99–108, New York

  23. Sheridan JG (2006) Digital live art: mediating wittingness in playful arenas. PhD Thesis. Computing Department, Lancaster University, Lancaster

  24. Sheridan JG, Bryan-Kinns N (2008) Designing for performative tangible interaction. Int J Arts Technol 1(3/4):288–308

    Article  Google Scholar 

  25. Sheridan J, Bryan-Kinns N, Reeves S, Marshall J, Lane G (2011) Graffito: crowd-based performative interaction at festivals. In Proc. CHI’11 Extended Abstracts, pp 1129–1134

  26. Sheridan J, Dix A, Lock S, Bayliss A (2004) Understanding interaction in ubiquitous guerrilla performances in playful arenas. In Proc HCI pp 3–18, Springer

  27. Tanenbaum J, Tanenbaum K, Wakkary R (2012) Steampunk as design fiction. In Proc. CHI ‘12, pp 1583–1592

  28. Taylor R, Boulanger P, Olivier P, Wallace J (2009) Exploring participatory performance to inform the design of collaborative public interfaces. CHI Extended Abs 3721–3726

  29. Taylor R, Schofield G, Shearer J, Boulanger P, Wallace J, Wright P, Olivier P (2011) Designing from within: humanaquarium. In Proceedings of the 2011 annual conference on Human factors in computing systems (CHI ‘11). ACM, New York, pp 1855–1864

  30. Taylor R, Schofield G, Shearer J, Boulanger P, Wallace J, Wright P, Olivier P (2011) Composing for the interactive medium. In the Proceedings of the 13th International Conference on Virtual Reality, Laval

  31. Tennent P, Martindale S, Marshall J, Reeves S, Walker B, Harter P (2012) Performing the experiment live, Proceedings of ACM CHI Workshop on Exploring CHI’s Relationship with Liveness, Austin

  32. Wright P, Blythe M, McCarthy J (2006) User experience and the idea of design in HCI. Interactive Systems, 12th (LNCS):1–14

Download references

Acknowledgments

Figures 1, 2 by Cassim Ladha. Figure 3 by Qasim Chaudhry. Figure 6 by Ko-Le Chen.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Culture Lab, School of Computing Science, Newcastle University, Newcastle upon Tyne, UK

    Robyn Taylor, Guy Schofield, John Shearer, Peter Wright & Patrick Olivier

  2. Advanced Man-Machine Interface Laboratory, Department of Computing Science, University of Alberta, Edmonton, Canada

    Pierre Boulanger

Authors
  1. Robyn Taylor
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Guy Schofield
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. John Shearer
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  4. Peter Wright
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  5. Pierre Boulanger
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  6. Patrick Olivier
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Robyn Taylor.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Taylor, R., Schofield, G., Shearer, J. et al. Nightingallery: theatrical framing and orchestration in participatory performance. Pers Ubiquit Comput 18, 1583–1600 (2014). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00779-014-0763-6

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00779-014-0763-6

Keywords

Search

Navigation