Abstract
Background
Arthroplasty surgeons are increasingly using personal protection systems with helmets. It is theoretically possible for the fans in these helmets to blow squames, sweat droplets and orobronchial fomites onto the surgical site. A controlled experiment was set up to investigate the effect of different surgical gowns on counts of airborne particles measuring ≥0.3 μm, using a hand-held particle counter.
Methods
The clothing that was sequentially tested included the following:
-
1.
Barrier® surgical gown (single use) made from nonwoven polypropylene (Mölnlycke Health Care Ltd, Dunstable, UK)
-
2.
Stryker® T5 Helmet (reusable) covered with a disposable Stryker® T4/T5 urethane hood worn separate to and enclosed by the Barrier® surgical gown both at the front and back
-
3.
Stryker® T5 Helmet (reusable) worn within a disposable Stryker® T4/T5 urethane zippered toga (Stryker Corporation, Kalamazoo, MI, USA)
Six readings were taken for each of the following three setups in a randomised order:
-
1.
Gown: surgeon with surgical gown and face mask
-
2.
Hood: surgeon with surgical gown and hood, maximum fan speed
-
3.
Toga: surgeon with toga, maximum fan speed
Wilcoxon rank sum tests were applied to assess equality of means between the three occlusive measures (gown, hood, toga). P values were computed based upon one-sided tests and adjusted for multiple comparisons using the Bonferroni correction.
Results
The mean particle counts (over more than 5 L of air) for the three set-ups were: gown: 1178 (least protective), hood: 328, toga: 42 (most protective). There was a significant reduction in particle counts for the toga versus gown (p = 0.007) and toga versus hood (p = 0.037); differences in particle counts were not significant between the hood and gown (p = 0.140).
Conclusions
The fans in the helmets do not increase contaminants by blowing particles from the head area. A significant reduction in surgeon-originated contaminants was seen with the toga compared to both the hood/gown separate ensemble and gowns alone.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Edmiston CE Jr, Sinski S, Seabrook GR, Simons D, Goheen MP. Airborne particulates in the OR environment. AORN J. 1999;69:1169–79.
Ritter MA. Operating room environment. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 1999;369:1039.
Friberg B. Ultraclean laminar airflow ORs. AORN J. 1998;67:841–2, 845–51.
Department of Health (Gateway Review Estates and Facilities Division). Health Technical Memorandum 03-01: specialised ventilation for healthcare premises. Part A: design and validation. 1st ed. London: The Stationery Office; 2007, p. 54–6.
Kearns KA, Witmer D, Makda J, Parvizi J, Jungkind D. Sterility of the personal protection system in total joint arthroplasty. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2011;469:3065–9.
Charnley J. Postoperative infection after total hip replacement with special reference to air contamination in the operating room. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 1972;87:167–87.
Franco JA, Baer H, Enneking WF. Airborne contamination in orthopedic surgery. Evaluation of laminar airflow system and aspiration suit. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 1977;122:231–43.
Anon. Surgical helmet systems. Health Devices. 1996;25:116–45.
Friberg B, Friberg S, Ostensson R, Burman LG. Surgical area contamination—comparable bacterial counts using disposable head and mask and helmet aspirator system, but dramatic increase upon omission of head-gear: an experimental study in horizontal laminar air-flow. J Hosp Infect. 2001;47:110–5.
Johnson GR, Morawska L, Ristovski ZD, Hargreaves M, Mengersen K, Chao CYH, Wan MP, Li Y, Xie X, Katoshevski D, Corbette S. Modality of human expired aerosol size distributions. J Aerosol Sci. 2011;42:839–51.
Reed MR. Re: Does the use of laminar flow and space suits reduce early deep infection? eLetter. J Bone Jt Surg Br. 2011;93:85–90.
Universal Hospital Supplies. Product references UN48100 and UN91220, respectively. http://www.uhs.co.uk/prodfiles/Uhs_PPE_Brochure.pdf. Accessed 17 September 2012.
Particle Measuring Systems. Handheld Particle Counter: Handilaz® Mini. http://www.pmeasuring.com/particleCounter/air/mobile/handilazmini. Accessed 17 September 2012.
Michla Y, Holliday M, Gould K, Weir DJ, McCaskie AW. The impact on bacterial contamination of hip arthroplasty wounds of personal protection helmet systems. J Bone Jt Surg Br. 2006;88–B:412.
Stocks GW, Self SD, Thompson B, Adam XA, O’Connor DP. Predicting bacterial populations based on airborne particulates: a study performed in nonlaminar flow operating rooms during joint arthroplasty surgery. Am J Infect Control. 2010;38:199–204.
McGovern PD, Albrecht M, Belani KG, Nachtsheim C, Partington PF, Carluke I, Reed MR. Forced-air warming and ultra-clean ventilation do not mix: an investigation of theatre ventilation, patient warming and joint replacement infection in orthopaedics. J Bone Jt Surg Br. 2011;93:1537–44.
Acknowledgments
We would like to thank Dr Christoper Coldwell, GP trainee at Royal Lancaster Infirmary, for his help with setting up the experiment. This experiment did not incur any running costs. The particle counter was bought by the orthopaedic department. No external funding was received.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
About this article
Cite this article
McGovern, P.D., Albrecht, M., Khan, S.K. et al. The influence of surgical hoods and togas on airborne particle concentration at the surgical site: an experimental study. J Orthop Sci 18, 1027–1030 (2013). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00776-013-0445-7
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00776-013-0445-7