Skip to main content
Log in

An uncemented metal-backed glenoid component in total shoulder arthroplasty for osteoarthritis: factors affecting survival and outcome

  • Original Article
  • Published:
Journal of Orthopaedic Science

Abstract

Background

The reported survivorship of total shoulder replacement (TSR) is variable. This is probably related to implant design. We report the outcome and survivorship of the uncemented glenoid in patients with osteoarthritis receiving a TSR with an intact or repairable rotator cuff at surgery.

Methods

Thirty-two consecutive patients were analysed after TSR using a screw-fixed porous coated metal-back glenoid performed by a single surgeon, with a minimum follow-up of five years. Thirty-three TSRs in 32 patients (19 women) with a mean age of 67 years were analysed, two of whom died before five years of follow-up. Thirty patients (31 shoulders) were monitored for a mean of 95 months (60–173 months).

Results

The Constant score improved by 22 points (p < 0.001). The only significant predictor of outcome on logistic regression analysis was the preoperative Constant score, with better scores resulting in a lesser improvement at last follow-up (p < 0.0001). Implant survivorship at ten years was 93 %. Three were revisions: two for polyethylene wear (both at six years) but with a well-fixed glenoid, and another for loosening of the glenoid at 11 years postoperatively. Univariate analysis identified that younger age (56 year vs. 68 years, p = 0.03) and a higher combined preoperative Constant score (35.7 vs. 21.5, p = 0.03) were both predictors of failure.

Conclusion

The uncemented glenoid performs well in the medium term for osteoarthritis of the shoulder in older patients, giving improved and sustained functional outcome. Age and preoperative level of function are predictors of outcome and survival.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5a–c

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Neer CS. Replacement arthroplasty for glenohumeral osteoarthritis. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 1974;56:1–13.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. Lugli T. Artificial shoulder joint by Pean (1893): the facts of an exceptional intervention and the prosthetic method. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 1978;133:215–8.

    Google Scholar 

  3. McElwain JP, English E. The early results of porous-coated total shoulder arthroplasty. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 1987;218:217–24.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Boileau P, Avidor C, Krishnan SG, Walch G, Kempf JF, Mole D. Cemented polyethylene versus uncemented metal-backed glenoid components in total shoulder arthroplasty: a prospective, double-blind, randomized study. J Shoulder Elbow Surg. 2002;11:351–9.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Taunton MJ, McIntosh AL, Sperling JW, Cofield RH. Total shoulder arthroplasty with a metal-backed, bone-ingrowth glenoid component. Medium to long-term results. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2008;90:2180–8.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Castagna A, Randelli M, Garofalo R, Maradei L, Giardella A, Borroni M. Mid-term results of a metal-backed component in total shoulder replacement. J Bone Joint Surg Br. 2010;92:1410–5.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  7. Rosenberg N, Neumann L, Modi A, Mersich IJ, Wallace AW. Improvements in survival of the uncemented Nottingham Total Shoulder prosthesis: a prospective comparative study. BMC Musculoskelet Disord. 2007;8:76.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. Constant CR, Murley AH. A clinical method of functional assessment of the shoulder. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 1987;214:160–4.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Kellgren JH, Lawrence JS. Radiological assessment of osteo-arthrosis. Ann Rheum Dis. 1957;16:494–502.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  10. Norman GR, Sloan JA, Wywich KW. Interpretatation of the changes in health-related quality of life: the remarkable universality of half a standard deviation. Med Care. 2003;41:582–92.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. Schmitt JS, Di Fabio RP. Reliable change and minimum difference (MID) proportions facilitated group responsiveness comparisons using individual threshold criteria. J Clin Epidemiol. 2004;57:1008–19.

    Google Scholar 

  12. Stewart MP, Kelly IG. Total shoulder replacement in rheumatoid disease: 7- to 13-year follow-up of 37 joints. J Bone Joint Surg Br. 1997;79:68–72.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  13. Iannotti JP, Norris TR. Influence of preoperative factors on outcome of shoulder arthroplasty for glenohumeral osteoarthritis. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2003;85:251–8.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  14. Chen AL, Bain EB, Horan MP, Hawkins RJ. Determinants of patient satisfaction with outcome after shoulder arthroplasty. J Shoulder Elbow Surg. 2007;16:25–30.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  15. Martin SD, Zurakowski D, Thornhill TS. Uncemented glenoid component in total shoulder arthroplasty. Survivorship and outcomes. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2005;87:1284–92.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  16. Clement ND, Mathur K, Colling RC, Stirrat AN. The metal-backed glenoid component in rheumatoid disease: eight to fourteen-year follow-up. J Shoulder Elbow Surg. 2010;19:749–56.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  17. Fox TJ, Cil A, Sperling JW, Sanchez-Sotelo J, Schleck CD, Cofield RH. Survival of the glenoid component in shoulder arthroplasty. J Shoulder Elbow Surg. 2009;18:859–63.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  18. Sneppen O, Fruensgaard S, Johannsen HV, Olsen BS, Sojbjerg JO, Andersen NH. Total shoulder replacement in rheumatoid arthritis: proximal migration and loosening. J Shoulder Elbow Surg. 1996;5:47–52.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  19. Bohsali KI, Wirth MA, Rockwood CA Jr. Complications of total shoulder arthroplasty. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2006;88:2279–92.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Conflict of interest

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to N. D. Clement.

About this article

Cite this article

Clement, N.D., Duckworth, A.D., Colling, R.C. et al. An uncemented metal-backed glenoid component in total shoulder arthroplasty for osteoarthritis: factors affecting survival and outcome. J Orthop Sci 18, 22–28 (2013). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00776-012-0308-7

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00776-012-0308-7

Keywords

Navigation