Skip to main content
Log in

Real-world clinical and economic outcomes for daily teriparatide patients in Japan

  • Original Article
  • Published:
Journal of Bone and Mineral Metabolism Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

A large medical and pharmacy claims database was used to evaluate outcomes in daily teriparatide (D-TPD) patients in Japan. 445 patients were identified (April 2008–July 2013) with 6+ months’ pre- and 18+ months’ post-index observation. D-TPD 20 µg subcutaneous injection is indicated for individuals at high risk of fracture. Descriptive analyses were conducted on clinical fractures, health care utilization, and costs. Adherence was measured by medication possession ratio (MPR) (High MPR > 0.8; 0.5 ≤ Medium MPR ≤ 0.8, Low MPR < 0.5). Adjusted analyses of Lower (Low + Medium) MPR vs. High MPR for fracture incidence and hospital admissions were performed using logistic and Poisson regression models; adjusted cost analyses used propensity bin bootstrapping methods. Baseline characteristics were: mean 74.7 years (standard deviation = 8.9); 90 % female; 20 % 1+ fracture. Post-index, 249 and 196 patients had High and Lower MPR, respectively. Mean incident fractures/1000 patient-years for Lower and High MPR patients were 77.4 and 57.7, respectively. Adjusted fracture risk was greater in Lower MPR patients [logistic odds ratio (OR) = 1.67, 95 % confidence interval 0.791–3.541; Poisson incidence rate ratio (IRR) = 1.505, 0.764–2.966]. Hospital admission risk was significantly greater in Lower than High MPR patients (OR = 1.85, 1.169–2.921; IRR = 1.47, 1.137–1.904). High MPR patients had numerically lower inpatient and total unadjusted costs than Lower MPR patients. Adjusted inpatient costs were significantly less in High MPR patients; outpatient and pharmacy costs were greater. Better adherence to D-TPD revealed a trend towards lower fracture risk, and significant reductions in hospital admissions and costs. The small sample size limited the robustness of these results.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Neer RM, Arnaud CD, Zanchetta JR, Prince R, Gaich GA, Reginster J, Hodsman AB, Eriksen EF, Ish-Shalaom S, Genant HK, Wang O, Mitlak BH (2001) Effect of parathyroid hormone (1–34) on fractures and bone mineral density in postmenopausal women with osteoporosis. N Engl J Med 344:1434–1441

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. Eriksen E, Keaveny TM, Gallagher ER, Krege JH (2014) Literature review: the effects of teriparatide at the hip in patients with osteoporosis. Bone 67:246–256

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. Seeman E, Compston J, Adachi J, Brandi ML, Cooper C, Dawson-Hughes B, Jönsson B, Pols H, Cramer JA (2007) Non-compliance: the Achilles’ heel of anti-fracture efficacy. Osteoporos Int 18:711–719

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Siris E, Selby P, Saag KG, Borgström F, Herings R, Silverman SL (2009) Impact of osteoporosis treatment adherence on fracture rates in North America and Europe. Am J Med 122:S3–S13

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Siris ES, Harris ST, Rosen CJ, Barr CE, Arvesen JN, Abbott TA, Silverman S (2006) Adherence to bisphosphonate therapy and fracture rates in osteoporotic women: relationship to vertebral and nonvertebral fractures from 2 US claims databases. Mayo Clin Proc 81:1013–1022

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Penning-van Beest FJ, Erkens JA, Olson M, Herings RM (2008) Loss of treatment benefit due to low compliance with bisphosphonate therapy. Osteoporos Int 19:511–517

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Weycker D, Macarios D, Edelsberg J, Oster G (2007) Compliance with osteoporosis drug therapy and risk of fracture. Osteoporos Int 18:271–277

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. Halpern R, Becker L, Usman Iqbal S, Kazis LE, Macarios D, Badamgarav E (2011) The association of adherence to osteoporosis therapies with fracture, all-cause medical costs, and all-cause hospitalizations: a retrospective claims analysis of female health plan enrollees with osteoporosis. J Manag Care Pharm 17:25–39

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Foster SA, Foley KA, Meadows ES et al (2011) Adherence and persistence with teriparatide among patients with commercial, medicare, and medicaid insurance. Osteoporos Int 22:551–557

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. Yu S, Burge RT, Foster S, Gelwicks S, Meadows E (2012) The impact of teriparatide adherence and persistence on fracture outcomes. Osteoporos Int 23:1102–1113

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Langdahl B, Rajzbaum G, Jacob F, Karras D, Ljunggren O, Lems WF, Fahrleitner-Pammer A, Walsh JB, Barker C, Kutahov A, Marin F (2009) Reduction in fracture rate and back pain and increased quality of life in postmenopausal women treated with teriparatide: 18-month data from the European Forsteo Observational Study (EFOS). Calcif Tissue Int 85:484–493

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  12. Lindsay R, Miller P, Pohl G, Glass E, Chen P, Krege JH (2009) Relationship between duration of teriparatide therapy and clinical outcomes in postmenopausal women with osteoporosis. Osteoporos Int 20:943–948

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. Silverman SL, Miller P, Sebba A, Weitz M, Wan X, Alam J, Masica D, Taylor KA, Ruff VA, Krohn K (2013) The direct assessment of nonvertebral fractures in community experience (DANCE) study: 2-year nonvertebral fragility fracture results. Osteoporos Int 24:2309–2317

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  14. Tanaka I, Sato M, Sugihara T, Faries D, Nojiri S, Graham-Clarke P, Flynn J, Burge R (2013) Adherence and persistence with once-daily teriparatide in Japan: A retrospective, prescription database, cohort study. J Osteoporos. doi:10.1155/2013/654218

  15. Medical Data Vision Co., Ltd. (MDV). 10F Sumitomo Fudosan Kanda Bldg., 7 Kanda, Mitoshiro-cho, Chiyoda-ku, Tokyo 101-0053, Japan

  16. Deyo RA, Cherkin DC, Ciol MA (1992) Adapting a clinical comorbidity index for use with ICD-9-CM administrative databases. J Clin Epidemiol 45:613–619

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  17. Quan H, Sundararajan V, Halfon P, Fong A, Burnand B, Luthi JC, Saunders LD, Beck CA, Feasby TE, Ghali WA (2005) Coding algorithms for defining comorbidities in ICD-9-CM and ICD-10 administrative data. Med Care 43:1130–1139

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  18. Sundararajan V, Henderson T, Perry C, Muggivan A, Quan H, Ghali WA (2004) New ICD-10 version of the Charlson comorbidity index predicted in-hospital mortality. J Clin Epidemiol 57:1288–1294

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  19. Lee RH, Lyles KW, Colon-Emerec C (2010) A review of the effect of anticonvulsant medications on bone mineral density and fracture risk. J Am Ger Soc 8:34–46

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  20. Petty SJ, O’Brien TJ, Wark JD (2007) Anti-epileptic medication and bone health. Osteoporos Int 18:129–142

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  21. Curtis JR, Mudano AS, Solomon DH, Xi J, Melton ME, Saag KG (2009) Identification and validation of vertebral compression fractures using administrative claims data. Med Care 47:69–72

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  22. Bonafede MM, Shi N, Bower AG, Barron RL, Grauer A, Chandler DB (2015) Teriparatide treatment patterns in osteoporosis and subsequent fracture events: a US claims analysis. Osteoporos Int 26:1203–1212

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  23. Leder BZ, Tsai JN, Uihlein AV, Wallace PM, Lee H, Neer RM, Burnett-Bowie SM (2015) Denosumab and teriparatide transitions in postmenopausal osteoporosis (the DATA-Switch study): extension of a randomised controlled trial. Lancet doi:10.1016/S0140-6736(15)61120-5

  24. Ministry of Health, Labor and Welfare [MHLW]. http://www.mhlw.go.jp/bunya/iryouhoken/iryouhoken01/dl/01_eng.pdf

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Masayo Sato.

Ethics declarations

Conflict of interest

RB and MS are full-time employees with Eli Lilly and Company and are shareholders of Eli Lilly and Company stock. TS is a full-time employee of inVentiv Health Clinical that has contract to provide statistical resources to Eli Lilly and Company.

Appendix: ICD-10-CM codes for fractures

Appendix: ICD-10-CM codes for fractures

Fracture site

ICD-10-CM codes

Vertebral, pathologic

M48.50XA, M80.08XA, M84.48XA, M84.68XA

Vertebral

S22.0, S32.0, S32.2, S12.9

Hip, pathologic

M84.459A, M84.359A

Hip

S72.0, S72.1, S72.2

Wrist, pathologic

M84.439A

Wrist/forearm

S52.0, S52.1, S52.2, S52.3, S52.5, S52.6, S52.9

Humerus, pathologic

M84.429A

Humerus

S42.2, S42.3, S42.4

Clavicle/rib

S22.3,S22.4, S22.2, S22.0

Pelvis, pathologic

M84.350A

Pelvis

S32.3, S32.4, S32.5, S32.6, S32.8, S32.9

Lower leg, pathologic

M84.369A, M84.469A

Lower leg

S82.1, S82.2, S82.4, S82.1, S82.8,S82.3, S82.2

Upper leg, pathologic

M84.453A

Upper leg/femur

S72.3, S72.4, S72.9

Other

S42.1, S62, S82.5, S82.6, S82.8, S92, T14.08, T07, M84.4

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Burge, R., Sato, M. & Sugihara, T. Real-world clinical and economic outcomes for daily teriparatide patients in Japan. J Bone Miner Metab 34, 692–702 (2016). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00774-015-0720-0

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00774-015-0720-0

Keywords

Navigation