Skip to main content
Log in

Effects of low-repetition jump exercise on osteogenic response in rats

  • Original Article
  • Published:
Journal of Bone and Mineral Metabolism Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Jump exercise in rats creates high-impact loading on lower limbs and results in the promotion of osteogenesis. Although we clarifi ed that a few loadings per day could increase bone mass and strength within 8 weeks, we did not observe an osteogenic response at the onset of the training period. The purpose of this study was to clarify whether the bone formation rate measured by the double-label immunofluorescence method increases with a few loadings for a short period. Forty female Wistar rats, 10 weeks old, were divided into a control group and three exercise groups: the 10 jumps/day (10 J) group, 40 jumps/day (40 J) group, and 100 jumps/day (100 J) group. The exercise groups were trained on days 1, 3, and 5, the fluorescent labels were injected on days 5 and 12, and the experiment ended on day 16. The bone formation rates were greater in all exercise groups compared with the control group and were significantly greater in the 40 J and 100 J groups than in the 10 J group. These data show that only 10 repetitions/day loading promotes the osteogenic response within a short period from the onset of the training.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Welch JM, Weaver CM, Turner CH (2004) Adaptations to free-fall impact are different in the shafts and bone ends of rat forelimbs. J Appl Physiol 97:1859–1865

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  2. Hou JC, Salem GJ, Zernicke RF, Barnard RJ (1990) Structural and mechanical adaptations of immature trabecular bone to strenuous exercise. J Appl Physiol 69:1309–1314

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  3. Jarvinen TL, Kannus P, Sievanen H, Jolma P, Heinonen A, Jarvinen M (1998) Randomized controlled study of effects of sudden impact loading on rat femur. J Bone Miner Res 13:1475–1482

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  4. Turner CH, Owan I, Takano Y (1995) Mechanotransduction in bone: role of strain rate. Am J Physiol 269:E438–E442

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  5. Duncan RL, Turner CH (1995) Mechanotransduction and the functional response of bone to mechanical strain. Calcif Tissue Int 57:344–358

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  6. Frost HM, Ferretti JL, Jee WS (1998) Perspectives: some roles of mechanical usage, muscle strength, and the mechanostat in skeletal physiology, disease, and research. Calcif Tissue Int 62:1–7

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  7. Forwood MR, Turner CH (1995) Skeletal adaptations to mechanical usage: results from tibial loading studies in rats. Bone (NY) 17:197S–205S

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  8. Lanyon LE, Rubin CT (1984) Static vs dynamic loads as an influence on bone remodelling. J Biomech 17:897–905

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  9. Mosley JR, March BM, Lynch J, Lanyon LE (1997) Strain magnitude related changes in whole bone architecture in growing rats. Bone (NY) 20:191–198

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  10. Rubin CT, Lanyon LE (1985) Regulation of bone mass by mechanical strain magnitude. Calcif Tissue Int 37:411–417

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  11. Mosley JR, Lanyon LE (1998) Strain rate as a controlling influence on adaptive modeling in response to dynamic loading of the ulna in growing male rats. Bone (NY) 23:313–318

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  12. Rubin CT, Lanyon LE (1984) Regulation of bone formation by applied dynamic loads. J Bone Joint Surg [Am] 66:397–402

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  13. Umemura Y, Ishiko T, Yamauchi T, Kurono M, Mashiko S (1997) Five jumps per day increase bone mass and breaking force in rats. J Bone Miner Res 12:1480–1485

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  14. Turner CH (1998) Three rules for bone adaptation to mechanical stimuli. Bone (NY) 23:399–407

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  15. Cullen DM, Smith RT, Akhter MP (2001) Bone-loading response varies with strain magnitude and cycle number. J Appl Physiol 91:1971–1976

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  16. Forwood MR, Owan I, Takano Y, Turner CH (1996) Increased bone formation in rat tibiae after a single short period of dynamic loading in vivo. Am J Physiol 270:E419–E423

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  17. Umemura Y, Ishiko T, Tsujimoto H, Miura H, Mokushi N, Suzuki H (1995) Effects of jump training on bone hypertrophy in young and old rats. Int J Sports Med 16:364–367

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  18. Honda A, Sogo N, Nagasawa S, Shimizu T, Umemura Y (2003) High-impact exercise strengthens bone in osteopenic ovariectomized rats with the same outcome as Sham rats. J Appl Physiol 95:1032–1037

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  19. Notomi T, Lee SJ, Okimoto N, Okazaki Y, Takamoto T, Nakamura T, Suzuki M (2000) Effects of resistance exercise training on mass, strength, and turnover of bone in growing rats. Eur J Appl Physiol 82:268–274

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  20. Notomi T, Okimoto N, Okazaki Y, Tanaka Y, Nakamura T, Suzuki M (2001) Effects of tower climbing exercise on bone mass, strength, and turnover in growing rats. J Bone Miner Res 16:166–174

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  21. Hart KJ, Shaw JM, Vajda E, Hegsted M, Miller SC (2001) Swim-trained rats have greater bone mass, density, strength, and dynamics. J Appl Physiol 91:1663–1668

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Seigo Nagasawa.

About this article

Cite this article

Nagasawa, S., Honda, A., Sogo, N. et al. Effects of low-repetition jump exercise on osteogenic response in rats. J Bone Miner Metab 26, 226–230 (2008). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00774-007-0812-6

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00774-007-0812-6

Key words

Navigation