Skip to main content
Log in

Neural network-based adaptive control for a supercavitating vehicle in transition phase

  • Original article
  • Published:
Journal of Marine Science and Technology Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

A supercavitation is a modern technology that can reduce the frictional resistance of an underwater vehicle. To reach supercavity, which is when the cavity envelops the entire vehicle body, a vehicle passes through the transition phase from fully wetted to supercavitating operation where unsteady hydrodynamic forces and moments are created by partial cavity. This paper presents analytical and numerical investigations into the dynamics of a supercavitating vehicle in the transition phase as well as a neural network-based adaptive control method that guarantees a stable control performance with modeling uncertainty. The ventilated cavity model is used for the rapid supercavity condition, which is when the cavitation number is relatively high. The cavity profile decides the immersion depths of the fins and body to calculate the hydrodynamical effects on the body. The supercavitating system in the transition phase is replaced by linearized pitch motion dynamics to verify the performance of the design controller. In addition, a numerical simulation shows how the proposed control method can compensate for modeling uncertainty.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5
Fig. 6
Fig. 7
Fig. 8
Fig. 9
Fig. 10
Fig. 11
Fig. 12
Fig. 13
Fig. 14
Fig. 15
Fig. 16
Fig. 17

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Dzielski J, Kurdila A (2003) A benchmark control problem for supercavitating vehicles and an initial investigation of solutions. J Vib Control 9(7):791–804

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Vanek B, Bokor J, Balas GJ, Arndt RE (2007) Longitudinal motion control of a high-speed supercavitation vehicle. J Vib Control 13(2):159–184

    Article  MATH  Google Scholar 

  3. Dzielski JE (2011) Longitudinal stability of a supercavitating vehicle. IEEE J Oceanic Eng 36(4):562–570

    Article  MATH  Google Scholar 

  4. Fan H, Zhang Y, Wang X (2011) Longitudinal dynamics modeling and MPC strategy for high-speed supercavitating vehicles. In: International conference on electric information and control engineering (ICEICE), 2011. IEEE, pp 5947–5950

  5. Calise AJ, Lee S, Sharma M (2001) Development of a reconfigurable flight control law for tailless aircraft. J Guid Control Dyn 24(5):896–902

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Kim N (2003) Improved methods in neural network-based adaptive output feedback control, with applications to flight control. Ph.D. dissertation, Georgia Tech., Atlanta, GA

  7. Calise AJ, Hovakimyan N, Idan M (2001) Adaptive output feedback control of nonlinear systems using neural networks. Automatica 37(8):1201–1211

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  8. Egardt B (1979) Stability of adaptive controllers. Lecture notes in control and information sciences 20. Springer, Berlin

  9. Peterson B, Narendra KS (1982) Bounded error adaptive control. IEEE Trans Autom Control 27(6):1161–1168

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Ioannou PA (1983) Adaptive systems with reduced models. Lecture notes in control and information sciences

  11. Ioannou PA, Kokotovic PV (1984) Instability analysis and improvement of robustness of adaptive control. Automatica 20(5):583–594

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  12. Narendra KS, Annaswamy AM (1987) A new adaptive law for robust adaptation without persistent excitation. IEEE Trans Autom Control 32(2):134–145

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  13. Narendra KS, Annaswamy AM (1989) Stable adaptive control, Chapter 8. Prentice Hall, Upper Saddle River

    Google Scholar 

  14. Naik SM, Kumar P, Ydstie BE (1992) Robust continuous-time adaptive control by parameter projection. IEEE Trans Autom Control 37(2):182–197

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  15. Pomet J-B, Praly L (1992) Adaptive nonlinear regulation: estimation from the Lyapunov equation. IEEE Trans Autom Control 37(6):729–740

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  16. Kim K et al (2013) Flight test of a flying-wing type UAV with partial wing loss using neural network controller. In: AIAA guidance, navigation, and control conference and exhibit, August 19–22, Boston, MA

  17. Corban JE, Calise AJ, Prasad J, Hur J, Kim N (2002) Flight evaluation of adaptive high-bandwidth control methods for unmanned helicopters. In: AIAA guidance, navigation, and control conference and exhibit

  18. Fujii T, Ura T (1991) SONCS: self-organizing neural-net-controller system for autonomous underwater robots. IEEE international joint conference on neural networks, 1991. IEEE, pp 1973–1982

  19. Ishii K, Fujii T, Ura T (1995) An on-line adaptation method in a neural network based control system for AUVs. IEEE J Oceanic Eng 20(3):221–228

    Article  MATH  Google Scholar 

  20. Ishii K, Ura T, Fujii T (1994) A feedforward neural network for identification and adaptive control of autonomous underwater vehicles. In: IEEE international conference on neural networks, 1994. IEEE world congress on computational intelligence. IEEE, pp 3216–3221

  21. Fujii T et al (1993) Development of a versatile test-bed “Twin-Burger” toward realization of intelligent behaviors of autonomous underwater vehicles. OCEANS’93. In: Proceedings of the engineering in harmony with ocean, vol 181. IEEE, pp I186–I191

  22. Varghese AN, Uhlman JS, Kirschner IN (2005) Numerical analysis of high-speed bodies in partially cavitating axisymmetric flow. J Fluids Eng 127(1):41–54

    Article  MATH  Google Scholar 

  23. Ahn B-K, Lee T-K, Kim H-T, Lee C-S (2012) Experimental investigation of supercavitating flows. Int J Nav Archit Ocean Eng 4(2):123–131

    Article  Google Scholar 

  24. Zou W, Yu K-P, Wan X-H (2010) Research on the gas-leakage rate of unsteady ventilated supercavity. J Hydrodyn Ser B 22(5):778–783

    Article  Google Scholar 

  25. Xiang M, Cheung S, Tu J, Zhang W (2011) Numerical research on drag reduction by ventilated partial cavity based on two-fluid model. Ocean Eng 38(17):2023–2032

    Article  Google Scholar 

  26. Elbing BR et al (2008) Bubble-induced skin-friction drag reduction and the abrupt transition to air-layer drag reduction. J Fluid Mech 612:201–236

    Article  Google Scholar 

  27. Savchenko YN (1998) Investigation of high-speed supercavitating underwater motion of bodies. NASA (19980020552)

  28. Logvinovich GV (1972) Hydrodynamics of free-boundary flows. Israel Program for Scientific Translations (IPST), Jerusalem, p 104

    Google Scholar 

  29. Garabedian P (1956) Calculation of axially symmetric cavities and jets. Pac J Math 6(4):611–684

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  30. May A (1975) Water entry and the cavity-running behavior of missiles. DTIC document

  31. Kirschner IN, Kring DC, Stokes AW, Fine NE, Uhlman JS (2002) Control strategies for supercavitating vehicles. J Vib Control 8(2):219–242

    Article  Google Scholar 

  32. Fine NE, Uhlman JS, Kring DC (2001) Calculation of the added mass and damping forces on supercavitating bodies. http://resolver.caltech.edu/cav2001:sessionB3.006

  33. Waid RN (1957) Cavity shapes for circular disk at angle of attack. CIT hydrodynamics report E-73.4. California Institute of Technology, CA (as summarized in May, 1975)

  34. Newman JN (1977) Marine hydrodynamics. MIT press, Cambridge

    Google Scholar 

  35. Logvinovich G, Serebryakov V (1975) On methods of calculating a shape of slender axisymmetric cavities. Gidromehanika 32:47–54

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Nakwan Kim.

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Kim, S., Kim, N. Neural network-based adaptive control for a supercavitating vehicle in transition phase. J Mar Sci Technol 20, 454–466 (2015). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00773-014-0298-6

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00773-014-0298-6

Keywords

Navigation