Skip to main content
Log in

URANS and DES analysis for a Wigley hull at extreme drift angles

  • Original Article
  • Published:
Journal of Marine Science and Technology Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Vortical structures and associated instabilities for flows around the Wigley hull for a wide range of drift angles (10° ≤ α ≤ 60°) with free surface are identified and analyzed. Quantitative verification and validation are conducted on three systematically refined grids with comparison to the experimental data for α = 10°. Analysis of the flow pattern shows a strong correlation between the vortical structures and free-surface wave elevation. For α = 10° and 30°, the flows remain steady and vortices are generated at the keel and fore and aft perpendiculars of the hull. The strength and complexity of these vortices increase with increasing α. At α = 45°, flow becomes unsteady without any significant change in the main flow pattern. At α = 60°, a complex and unsteady flow field on the leeward side of the hull is formed with a large recirculation region from the aft to the fore end, which prevents the flow coming from below the keel from moving up and generating the keel vortices observed at lower drift angles. Karman-like and helical instabilities are analyzed. The effect of Froude number is more apparent for large than for small drift angles.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5
Fig. 6
Fig. 7
Fig. 8
Fig. 9
Fig. 10
Fig. 11
Fig. 12
Fig. 13
Fig. 14
Fig. 15
Fig. 16
Fig. 17
Fig. 18
Fig. 19
Fig. 20
Fig. 21
Fig. 22
Fig. 23
Fig. 24
Fig. 25
Fig. 26
Fig. 27
Fig. 28
Fig. 29
Fig. 30
Fig. 31
Fig. 32
Fig. 33
Fig. 34

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Mesbahi AP, Clarke D (eds) (2005) Proceedings of the 24th International Towing Tank Conference, 2005, Edinburgh, Scotland, 4–10 September. University of Newcastle upon Tyne, Newcastle upon Tyne

  2. Metcalf B, Longo J, Ghosh G, Stern F (2006) Unsteady free-surface wave-induced boundary layer separation for a surface-piercing NACA 0024 foil: towing tank experiments. J Fluids Struct 22:77–98

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Kandasamy M, Xing T, Stern F (2009) Unsteady free surface wave-induced separation: vortical structures and instabilities. J Fluids Struct 25(2):343–363

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Xing T, Kandasamy M, Stern F (2007) Unsteady free-surface wave-induced separation: analysis of turbulent structures using detached eddy simulation and single-phase level set. J Turbul 8(44):1–35

    Google Scholar 

  5. Xing T, Shao J, Stern F (2007) BKW-RS-DES of unsteady vortical flow for KVLCC2 at large drift angles. In: Proc 9th Int Conf on Numerical Ship Hydrodynamics, Ann Arbor, MI, 5–8 Aug 2007

  6. Carrica PM, Wilson RV, Stern F (2007) An unsteady single-phase level set method for viscous free surface flows. Int J Numer Methods Fluids 53:229–256

    Article  MATH  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  7. Larsson L, Stern F, Bertram V (2003) Benchmarking of computational fluid dynamics for ship flows: the Gothenburg 2000 workshop. J Ship Res 47(1):63–81

    Google Scholar 

  8. Hino T (2005) CFDWS05-Tokyo 2005 a workshop on numerical ship hydrodynamics. National Maritime Research Institute, Tokyo

    Google Scholar 

  9. Travin A, Shur M, Strelets M (2002) Physical and numerical upgrades in the detached-eddy simulation of complex turbulent flows. In: Friedrich R, Rodi W (eds) Advances in LES of complex flows. Kluwer, Dordrecht, pp 239–254

  10. Balay S, Buschelman K, Gropp W, Kaushik D, Knepley M, Curfman L, Smith B, Zang H (2002) PETSc user manual, ANL-95/11-Revision 2.1.5. Argonne National Laboratory, Argonne

  11. Xing T, Carrica P, Stern F (2008) Computational towing tank procedures for singe run curves of resistance and propulsion. ASME J Fluids Eng 130(10):101102

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Tecplot, Inc. (2004) CFD analyzer™ user’s manual. Tecplot, Inc., Bellevue

  13. Hunt JCR, Wray AA, Moin P (1988) Eddies, stream, and convergence zones in turbulent flows (Report CTR-S88). Center for Turbulence Research, Stanford

  14. Stern F, Wilson R, Shao J (2006) Quantitative V&V of CFD simulations and certification of CFD codes. Int J Numer Methods Fluids 50:1335–1355

    Article  MATH  Google Scholar 

  15. Xing T, Stern F (2010) Factors of safety for Richardson extrapolation. ASME J Fluid Eng (in press)

  16. Kashiwagi M (1984) The study of fluid dynamical forces of maneuvering acting on a ship in broaching motion (Ph.D. thesis). University of Osaka, Osaka

  17. Gursul I (1994) Unsteady flow phenomena over delta wings at high angle of attack. AIAA J 32(2):225–231

    Article  Google Scholar 

  18. Gursul I (2005) Review of unsteady vortex flows over slender delta wings. J Aircr 42(2):299–319

    Article  Google Scholar 

  19. Stern F, Bhushan S, Carrica PM, Yang JM (2009) Large scale parallel computing and scalability study for surface combatant static maneuver and straight ahead conditions using CFDShip-Iowa (invited paper). In: Parallel CFD 2009, Moffett Field, CA, 18–22 May 2009

Download references

Acknowledgments

The Office of Naval Research under Grant N00014-01-1-0073, administered by Dr. Patrick Purtell, sponsored this research. In addition, the “Colegio Oficial de Ingenieros Navales y Oceánicos” of Spain helped the author financially during his studies.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding authors

Correspondence to Antonio Pinto-Heredero, Tao Xing or Frederick Stern.

About this article

Cite this article

Pinto-Heredero, A., Xing, T. & Stern, F. URANS and DES analysis for a Wigley hull at extreme drift angles. J Mar Sci Technol 15, 295–315 (2010). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00773-010-0092-z

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00773-010-0092-z

Keywords

Navigation