Skip to main content
Log in

Quality-based model for Life Sciences research guidelines

  • Practitioner's Report
  • Published:
Accreditation and Quality Assurance Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Nowadays, the requirement to define adequate standards and to identify and validate general guidelines for scientific activity is becoming increasingly apparent also in non-regulated scientific research. Guidelines are fundamental tools to provide valid indications for proper conduct in a research laboratory, the correct use of equipment and procedures, as well as for aligning and standardizing the procedures used in different scientific contexts. The identification, dissemination and application of common guidelines can improve significantly the reproducibility of the scientific results and the exchange of materials and data in the context of scientific consortia, comprising also industrial partners and meta-analysis projects. A Quality and Project Management OpenLab research network was formed in 2012 to develop and apply Total Quality Management models to Life Sciences research laboratories. One of the main tasks of the network has been the definition of a model for the drafting of guidelines, firmly based on quality principles and documentation management. The outcome is an operational flow describing all the phases of the process, which has been validated by four different drafting groups through the production of 13 guidelines ranging from research activity to equipment and facility management. Different institutes of the National Research Council are currently following these guidelines; some of them have also been used to define the procedures included in a certified Quality Management System for a research laboratory. Our experience shows that the model for guidelines we have developed makes drafting guidelines easier and more immediate, and significantly, it is applicable to different scientific contexts and disciplines, including both non-regulated research and technology transfer-oriented research, and also the Quality Management System of a scientific laboratory.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3

Abbreviations

Defra:

Department for Environment, Food and Rural Affairs

DoE:

Design of Experiments

FMEA:

Failure Mode and Effect Analysis

GLP:

Good Laboratory Practice

GRP:

Good Research Practice

JCoPR:

Joint Code of Practice for Research

PDCA:

PLAN-DO-CHECK-ACT

QMS:

Quality Management System

QPBR:

Quality Practices in Basic Biomedical Research

qPMO:

Quality and Project Management OpenLab

TQM:

Total Quality Management

References

  1. AGREE Next Steps Consortium (2009) The AGREE II Instrument (electronic version). http://www.agreetrust.org. Accessed 15 Feb 2013

  2. WHO Library Cataloguing-in-Publication Data (2010) Quality practices in basic biomedical research (QPBR) training manual. ISBN 978 92 4 159921 4 (NLM classification: W 20.5) Copyright© World Health Organization on behalf of the Special Programme for Research and Training in Tropical Diseases

  3. Worth Health Organization. Special Programme for Research and Training in Tropical Diseases (TDR) sponsored by UNICEF, UNDP, World Bank and WHO. Handbook: quality practices in basic biomedical research. Prepared for TDR by the Scientific Working Group on Quality Practices in Basic Biomedical Research. http://www.who.int/tdr/publications/quality_practice/en/

  4. https://www.gov.uk/government/publications/joint-code-of-practice-for-research-jcopr

  5. Bongiovanni A, Colotti G, Liguori GL, Di Carlo M, Digilio FA, Lacerra G, Mascia A, Cirafici AM, Barra A, Lanati A, Kisslinger A (2015) Applying Quality principles and Project Management methodologies in biomedical research: a public research network’s case study. Accred Qual Assur 20:203–213

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. http://quality4lab.cnr.it/en

  7. Ishikawa K (1968) Guide to quality control. JUSE, Tokyo

    Google Scholar 

  8. Deming WE (1986) Out of the crisis. MIT Press, Cambridge

    Google Scholar 

  9. Blanton Juran JM, Godfrey A (1999) Juran’s quality handbook. McGraw Hill, New York

    Google Scholar 

  10. Leigh A. Decisions Decisions! (1986) A practical management guide to problem solving and decision making. Gower Pub Co, Aldershot

    Google Scholar 

  11. Linee guida per la trasparenza, la semplificazione del linguaggio e la pubblicazione delle informazioni sul sito Unifi: un breve “manuale di stile” per facilitare il percorso della trasparenza. A cura di Rosina Zammuto e Paola Zampi Settembre 2010 Università degli Studi di Firenze. http://www.unifi.it/upload/sub/newsletter_unifi/nl109_lineeguida_trasp.pdf

  12. Stamatis DH (2003) Failure mode and effect analysis: FMEA from theory to execution. ASQ Quality Press, Milwaukee

    Google Scholar 

  13. Mancinelli S, Zazzu V, Turcato A, Lacerra G, Digilio FA, Mascia A, Di Carlo M, Cirafici AM, Bongiovanni A, Colotti G, Kisslinger A, Lanati A, Liguori GL (2015) Applying Design of Experiments methodology to PEI toxicity assay on neural progenitor cells. Mathematical models in biology bringing mathematics to life. Springer, Berlin

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgments

The authors wish to thank Sara Mancinelli, Valeria Zazzu and Andrea Turcato for DoE application and validation, Romeo Prezioso for the web platform management, Daniela Cavaliere for helping in the Drosophila facility and Jon Cole for editing the manuscript. The present studies have been supported by the Italian Ministry of Economy and Finance (CNR-Project FaReBio Farmaci e Reti Biotecnologiche di Qualità) and by the Fondazione CON IL SUD (Grant 2011-PDR-13) (to GLL). The funders had no role in the study design, data collection and analysis, decision to publish or preparation of the manuscript.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding authors

Correspondence to F. Anna Digilio or Giovanna L. Liguori.

Additional information

F. Anna Digilio and Antonella Lanati share first co-authorship.

Giuseppina Lacerra and Giovanna L. Liguori share senior co-authorship.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Digilio, F.A., Lanati, A., Bongiovanni, A. et al. Quality-based model for Life Sciences research guidelines. Accred Qual Assur 21, 221–230 (2016). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00769-016-1205-0

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00769-016-1205-0

Keywords

Navigation