Skip to main content
Log in

A study of simulated normal probability functions using Microsoft Excel

  • General Paper
  • Published:
Accreditation and Quality Assurance Aims and scope Submit manuscript

An Erratum to this article was published on 23 June 2016

Abstract

Simulations are used in many calculations and forecasting procedures, from market analysis to estimation of measurement uncertainty. Microsoft Excel offers an innate procedure to simulate a Gaussian distribution and a pseudorandom number generator (PRNG). Using the latter, five additional simulations models with a potential to simulate the normal probability distribution function (PDF) were explored and compared with the theoretical Gaussian PDF based on a defined average (location) and standard deviation (width). The simulated distributions appeared “displaced” from the Gaussian function. Simulations of the distributions by a large number of observations confirmed different properties of the six simulation procedures. The range of the distributions differed, i.e. the difference between the maximum and minimum simulated values. The innate procedure yielded an unsymmetrical distribution that was shifted to the right (higher values). A miniscule divergence from expected values was demonstrated. A systematic difference between the simulated distributions and the theoretical Gauss distribution may not be of any practical importance in applied metrology, whereas it may be devastating in other applications, e.g. encoding and market simulations. There were differences between the models which may influence their use. It is suggested that a root cause may be found in the PRNG.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Kallner A (2015) Microsoft EXCEL 2010 offers an improved random number generator allowing efficient simulation in chemical laboratory studies. Clin Chim Acta 438:210–211

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  2. Farrance I, Frenkel R (2014) Uncertainty in measurement, a review of Monte Carlo simulation using Microsoft EXCEL for the calculation of uncertainties through functional relationship, including uncertainties in empirically derived constants. Clin Biochem Rev 35:37–49

    Google Scholar 

  3. Evaluation of measurement data—supplement 1 to the “Guide to the expression of uncertainty in measurement”—propagation of distributions using a Monte Carlo method. JCGM 101:2008. Downloadable from www.bipm.org. Accessed Feb 2016

  4. Yalta AT (2008) The accuracy of statistical distributions in Microsoft® in Excel 2007. Comput Stat Data Anal 52:4579–4586

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Monti KL (1995) Folded empirical distribution function curves—mountain plots. Am Stat 49:342–346

    Google Scholar 

  6. Krouwer JS, Monti KL (1995) A simple, graphical method to evaluate laboratory assays. Eur J Clin Chem Clin Biochem 33:525–529

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  7. Kallner A (2014) Comprehensive method comparisons, getting more from the data. Accred Qual Assur 19:451–457. doi:10.1007/s00769-014-1089-9

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Rukhin A, Soto J, Nechvatal J, Smid M, Barker E, Leigh S, Levenson M, Vangel M, Banks D, Heckert A, Dray J, Vo S (2001) A statistical test suite for random and pseudorandom number generators for cryptographic applications. NIST special publication 800-22 (with revisions dated 15 May 2001)

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Anders Kallner.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Kallner, A. A study of simulated normal probability functions using Microsoft Excel. Accred Qual Assur 21, 271–276 (2016). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00769-016-1200-5

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00769-016-1200-5

Keywords

Navigation